← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Garadacimab side effects: what 507 FDA adverse event reports show

Garadacimab · Andembry · 15 reaction terms · 544 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Activated factor xii (fxiia) inhibitor (monoclonal antibody)

FDA label, Indications wording

Brand names

Andembry

openFDA label

Who reports

507 reports · 81% serious · 3 with death outcome · 78% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

ANDEMBRY is indicated for prophylaxis to prevent attacks of hereditary angioedema (HAE) in adult and pediatric patients aged 12 years and older. ANDEMBRY is an activated Factor XII (FXIIa) inhibitor (monoclonal antibody) indicated for prophylaxis to prevent attacks of hereditary angioedema (HAE) in adult and pediatric patients aged 12 years and older. ( 1 )

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Garadacimab-gxii, an activated Factor XII (FXIIa) inhibitor, is a recombinant, fully human, monoclonal antibody (IgG4/ λ -light chain) produced in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells. Based on the amino acid sequence, the molecular weight of garadacimab-gxii is approximately 148 kDa.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 13 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 2Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 4Not in label — unassessed 5
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 2 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hereditary angioedema3441,401.2
1,315.6–1,492.3ROR 4,356.1 · χ² 464,217 / p <1e-300
1,258.9 EB05 1,151.1 · IC025 +8.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 1,095.7no trial data cached
Insurance issue3186.5
61.5–121.7ROR 92.0 · χ² 2,531 / p <1e-300
82.1 EB05 60.6 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 118.5no trial data cached
Pharyngeal swelling834.6
17.4–68.8ROR 35.1 · χ² 228 / p 7e-52
32.0 EB05 17.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=7no trial data cached
Poor venous access728.1
13.4–58.6ROR 28.4 · χ² 157 / p 3e-36
25.7 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=7no trial data cached
Stress4626.5
20.1–34.9ROR 29.0 · χ² 1,105 / p 1e-242
26.2 EB05 20.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.4no trial data cached
Therapy change625.7
11.6–57.1ROR 26.0 · χ² 119 / p 5e-28
22.8 EB05 9.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=6no trial data cached
Product dose omission in error1624.7
15.2–39.9ROR 25.4 · χ² 340 / p 3e-76
24.0 EB05 15.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 60.4no trial data cached
Bladder disorder520.8
8.7–49.7ROR 21.0 · χ² 75 / p 2e-18
16.5 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached
Therapy interrupted3319.8
14.2–27.5ROR 21.1 · χ² 572 / p 1e-126
19.6 EB05 14.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 31.1no trial data cached
Product availability issue611.1
5.0–24.5ROR 11.2 · χ² 45 / p 8e-12
7.6 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.6no trial data cached
Injection site erythema (redness where injected)155.0
3.1–8.3ROR 5.1 · χ² 45 / p 1e-11
4.4 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 17.5no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hereditary angioedema3441,401.2
1,315.6–1,492.3ROR 4,356.1 · χ² 464,217 / p <1e-300
1,258.9 EB05 1,151.1 · IC025 +8.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 1,095.7no trial data cached
Stress4626.5
20.1–34.9ROR 29.0 · χ² 1,105 / p 1e-242
26.2 EB05 20.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.4no trial data cached
Therapy interrupted3319.8
14.2–27.5ROR 21.1 · χ² 572 / p 1e-126
19.6 EB05 14.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 31.1no trial data cached
Insurance issue3186.5
61.5–121.7ROR 92.0 · χ² 2,531 / p <1e-300
82.1 EB05 60.6 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 118.5no trial data cached
Product dose omission in error1624.7
15.2–39.9ROR 25.4 · χ² 340 / p 3e-76
24.0 EB05 15.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 60.4no trial data cached
Injection site erythema (redness where injected)155.0
3.1–8.3ROR 5.1 · χ² 45 / p 1e-11
4.4 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 17.5no trial data cached
Pharyngeal swelling834.6
17.4–68.8ROR 35.1 · χ² 228 / p 7e-52
32.0 EB05 17.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=7no trial data cached
Poor venous access728.1
13.4–58.6ROR 28.4 · χ² 157 / p 3e-36
25.7 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=7no trial data cached
Product availability issue611.1
5.0–24.5ROR 11.2 · χ² 45 / p 8e-12
7.6 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.6no trial data cached
Therapy change625.7
11.6–57.1ROR 26.0 · χ² 119 / p 5e-28
22.8 EB05 9.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=6no trial data cached
Bladder disorder520.8
8.7–49.7ROR 21.0 · χ² 75 / p 2e-18
16.5 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached
Syringe issue37.1
2.3–21.9ROR 7.1 · χ² 10 / p 7e-4
3.9 EB05 1.5 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Not in label — unassessedserious n=3no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Garadacimab?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Garadacimab are hereditary angioedema, stress, insurance issue, injection site erythema, injection site swelling, pharyngeal swelling. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Garadacimab have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Garadacimab has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Garadacimab causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.