← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Granules For side effects: what 593 FDA adverse event reports show

Granules For Oral Solution · 15 reaction terms · 113 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Granules For Oral Solution (Fosfomycin Tromethamine)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

593 reports · 91% serious · 29 with death outcome · 83% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Fosfomycin Tromethamine is indicated only for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (acute cystitis) in women due to susceptible strains of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis . Fosfomycin Tromethamine is not indicated for the treatment of pyelonephritis or perinephric abscess.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Fosfomycin Tromethamine Granules for Oral Solution contains fosfomycin tromethamine, a synthetic, broad spectrum, bactericidal antibiotic for oral administration. It is available a.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 10 strongest signals

Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 1Not in label — unassessed 8
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 5 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Coordination abnormal1025.1
13.6–46.5ROR 25.6 · χ² 208 / p 2e-47
23.9 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.2no trial data cached
Agranulocytosis (severe loss of white cells)1324.8
14.5–42.5ROR 25.4 · χ² 274 / p 7e-62
24.0 EB05 14.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.8no trial data cached
Cystitis2224.3
16.1–36.6ROR 25.2 · χ² 469 / p 2e-104
23.8 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 21.1no trial data cached
Sputum discoloured622.4
10.1–49.7ROR 22.6 · χ² 102 / p 2e-24
19.4 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.6no trial data cached
Polyneuropathy720.8
9.9–43.4ROR 21.0 · χ² 113 / p 1e-26
18.5 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.4no trial data cached
Pharyngeal swelling518.4
7.7–44.2ROR 18.6 · χ² 66 / p 2e-16
14.1 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached
Serotonin syndrome916.6
8.7–31.8ROR 16.9 · χ² 117 / p 1e-27
14.8 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.6no trial data cached
Tooth fracture516.0
6.7–38.3ROR 16.1 · χ² 56 / p 3e-14
11.5 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.4no trial data cached
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms68.3
3.7–18.4ROR 8.4 · χ² 32 / p 1e-8
5.6 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.3no trial data cached
Foetal exposure during pregnancy125.2
3.0–9.1ROR 5.3 · χ² 37 / p 6e-10
4.4 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.4no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Cystitis2224.3
16.1–36.6ROR 25.2 · χ² 469 / p 2e-104
23.8 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 21.1no trial data cached
Agranulocytosis (severe loss of white cells)1324.8
14.5–42.5ROR 25.4 · χ² 274 / p 7e-62
24.0 EB05 14.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.8no trial data cached
Foetal exposure during pregnancy125.2
3.0–9.1ROR 5.3 · χ² 37 / p 6e-10
4.4 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.4no trial data cached
Coordination abnormal1025.1
13.6–46.5ROR 25.6 · χ² 208 / p 2e-47
23.9 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.2no trial data cached
Serotonin syndrome916.6
8.7–31.8ROR 16.9 · χ² 117 / p 1e-27
14.8 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.6no trial data cached
Polyneuropathy720.8
9.9–43.4ROR 21.0 · χ² 113 / p 1e-26
18.5 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.4no trial data cached
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms68.3
3.7–18.4ROR 8.4 · χ² 32 / p 1e-8
5.6 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.3no trial data cached
Sputum discoloured622.4
10.1–49.7ROR 22.6 · χ² 102 / p 2e-24
19.4 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.6no trial data cached
Tooth fracture516.0
6.7–38.3ROR 16.1 · χ² 56 / p 3e-14
11.5 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.4no trial data cached
Pharyngeal swelling518.4
7.7–44.2ROR 18.6 · χ² 66 / p 2e-16
14.1 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached
Drug exposure during pregnancy44.1
1.5–10.9ROR 4.1 · χ² 7 / p 0.005
3.0 EB05 1.4 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.2no trial data cached
Pulmonary arterial hypertension49.7
3.7–25.8ROR 9.8 · χ² 23 / p 8e-7
5.6 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Pulmonary thrombosis412.9
4.9–34.3ROR 13.0 · χ² 33 / p 5e-9
7.7 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +0.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.3no trial data cached
Thyroid cancer38.7
2.8–27.0ROR 8.8 · χ² 14 / p 1e-4
4.6 EB05 1.7 · IC025 -0.0
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.6no trial data cached
Caesarean section39.0
2.9–27.8ROR 9.0 · χ² 14 / p 9e-5
4.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.0Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 5.9no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Minoxidil (oral) ↔ Pericardial effusion.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Granules For?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Granules For are cystitis, agranulocytosis, coordination abnormal, serotonin syndrome, polyneuropathy, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Granules For have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Granules For has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Granules For causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.