← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Ibuprofen and Liquid-Filled side effects: what 3,917 FDA adverse event reports show

Ibuprofen Capsule, Liquid-Filled · 149 reaction terms · 3,816 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) of the closest related product

Label matched

Ibuprofen (Ibuprofen)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

3,917 reports · 35% serious · 54 with death outcome · 70% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Carefully consider the potential benefits and risks of ibuprofen tablets and other treatment options before deciding to use ibuprofen. Use the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration consistent with individual patient treatment goals (see WARNINGS ). Ibuprofen tablets are indicated for relief of the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Ibuprofen tablets USP contain the active ingredient ibuprofen, which is (±) - 2 - ( p - isobutylphenyl) propionic acid. Ibuprofen is a white to off-white, crystalline powder with a.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

Cardiovascular Thrombotic Events Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) cause an increased risk of serious cardiovascular thrombotic events, including myocardial infarction and stroke, which can be fatal. This risk may occur early in treatment and may increase with duration of use [see Warnings and Precautions ].

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 1Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 8Reporting / coding artifact 9Not in label — unassessed 21
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 109 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Oral discomfort7127.4
21.8–34.6ROR 27.9 · χ² 1,775 / p <1e-300
27.1 EB05 22.2 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=3 · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Coeliac disease4725.7
19.4–34.2ROR 26.0 · χ² 1,089 / p 5e-239
25.4 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.4 · 98% consumerno trial data cached
Poor quality product administered4121.6
15.9–29.2ROR 21.8 · χ² 780 / p 5e-172
21.3 EB05 16.3 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=3 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Product complaint8217.6
14.2–21.9ROR 18.0 · χ² 1,268 / p 5e-278
17.5 EB05 14.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=7 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Drug effect less than expected3714.1
10.2–19.4ROR 14.2 · χ² 436 / p 4e-97
13.8 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumerno trial data cached
Gallbladder disorder4413.2
9.8–17.7ROR 13.3 · χ² 483 / p 3e-107
12.9 EB05 9.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.4 · ♀ 95% (drug 70%)no trial data cached
Cholelithiasis7912.9
10.4–16.1ROR 13.2 · χ² 856 / p 2e-188
12.8 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.6 · ♀ 99% (drug 70%)no trial data cached
Hypoaesthesia oral3612.8
9.3–17.8ROR 12.9 · χ² 380 / p 6e-85
12.4 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.4 · 89% consumerno trial data cached
Cholecystitis2812.6
8.7–18.3ROR 12.7 · χ² 288 / p 6e-65
12.1 EB05 8.5 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.0 · ♀ 97% (drug 70%)no trial data cached
Product taste abnormal239.2
6.1–13.8ROR 9.2 · χ² 159 / p 9e-37
8.2 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumerno trial data cached
Product physical issue349.1
6.5–12.8ROR 9.2 · χ² 238 / p 4e-54
8.5 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=4 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Product use complaint258.6
5.8–12.8ROR 8.7 · χ² 161 / p 3e-37
7.8 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=9 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication3056.7
6.0–7.5ROR 7.2 · χ² 1,486 / p <1e-300
6.6 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.2 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Injection site haematoma165.8
3.6–9.5ROR 5.9 · χ² 60 / p 6e-15
5.1 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Throat irritation465.5
4.1–7.3ROR 5.6 · χ² 166 / p 3e-38
5.2 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7 · 96% consumerno trial data cached
Fear275.3
3.7–7.8ROR 5.4 · χ² 91 / p 8e-22
4.9 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.7no trial data cached
Retching215.3
3.5–8.1ROR 5.3 · χ² 69 / p 5e-17
4.8 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.1 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Deep vein thrombosis (leg blood clot)645.2
4.1–6.7ROR 5.3 · χ² 216 / p 3e-49
5.1 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.9 · ♀ 98% (drug 70%)no trial data cached
Cholecystectomy115.2
2.9–9.4ROR 5.2 · χ² 33 / p 4e-9
4.3 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.7no trial data cached
Ulcer144.7
2.8–7.9ROR 4.7 · χ² 37 / p 5e-10
4.1 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 3.5no trial data cached
Faeces discoloured194.7
3.0–7.4ROR 4.7 · χ² 52 / p 3e-13
4.2 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.2no trial data cached
Drug administration error264.5
3.1–6.6ROR 4.5 · χ² 67 / p 2e-16
4.2 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.7 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Expired product administered264.2
2.9–6.2ROR 4.2 · χ² 60 / p 4e-15
3.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=3 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Choking154.1
2.5–6.9ROR 4.1 · χ² 33 / p 6e-9
3.7 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.5no trial data cached
Hiatus hernia104.1
2.2–7.7ROR 4.1 · χ² 21 / p 3e-6
3.5 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.0no trial data cached
Pulmonary embolism (lung blood clot)714.0
3.2–5.0ROR 4.0 · χ² 156 / p 4e-36
3.9 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.7 · ♀ 96% (drug 70%)no trial data cached
Injury523.9
3.0–5.2ROR 4.0 · χ² 112 / p 2e-26
3.8 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.1no trial data cached
Abnormal dreams203.9
2.5–6.0ROR 3.9 · χ² 39 / p 2e-10
3.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached
Drug effect decreased393.8
2.8–5.2ROR 3.9 · χ² 79 / p 4e-19
3.7 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.8 · 95% consumerno trial data cached
Pharyngeal oedema113.8
2.1–6.8ROR 3.8 · χ² 20 / p 4e-6
3.3 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Irritable bowel syndrome153.8
2.3–6.2ROR 3.8 · χ² 28 / p 7e-8
3.4 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Multi-organ failure123.7
2.1–6.4ROR 3.7 · χ² 21 / p 3e-6
3.3 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.1no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Product use in unapproved indication3056.7
6.0–7.5ROR 7.2 · χ² 1,486 / p <1e-300
6.6 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.2 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Abdominal discomfort943.0
2.5–3.7ROR 3.1 · χ² 125 / p 2e-29
3.0 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.8 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Incorrect dose administered932.2
1.8–2.7ROR 2.2 · χ² 61 / p 2e-15
2.2 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.8Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.0 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Overdose822.0
1.6–2.5ROR 2.0 · χ² 42 / p 4e-11
2.0 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.6Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.7 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Product complaint8217.6
14.2–21.9ROR 18.0 · χ² 1,268 / p 5e-278
17.5 EB05 14.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=7 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Cholelithiasis7912.9
10.4–16.1ROR 13.2 · χ² 856 / p 2e-188
12.8 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.6 · ♀ 99% (drug 70%)no trial data cached
Urticaria (hives)722.3
1.8–2.9ROR 2.3 · χ² 53 / p 2e-13
2.3 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.8Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.2 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Pulmonary embolism (lung blood clot)714.0
3.2–5.0ROR 4.0 · χ² 156 / p 4e-36
3.9 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.7 · ♀ 96% (drug 70%)no trial data cached
Oral discomfort7127.4
21.8–34.6ROR 27.9 · χ² 1,775 / p <1e-300
27.1 EB05 22.2 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=3 · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Paraesthesia (tingling/numbness)682.3
1.8–2.9ROR 2.3 · χ² 50 / p 1e-12
2.3 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.8Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.5no trial data cached
Deep vein thrombosis (leg blood clot)645.2
4.1–6.7ROR 5.3 · χ² 216 / p 3e-49
5.1 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.9 · ♀ 98% (drug 70%)no trial data cached
Dyspepsia (indigestion)583.2
2.5–4.1ROR 3.2 · χ² 84 / p 2e-20
3.1 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.8 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Flushing552.9
2.2–3.7ROR 2.9 · χ² 66 / p 2e-16
2.8 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.6 · ♀ 46% (drug 70%) · 93% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Ibuprofen (NSAIDs) ↔ Gastrointestinal bleeding.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Ibuprofen and Liquid-Filled?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Ibuprofen and Liquid-Filled are drug effective for unapproved indication, abdominal pain upper, abdominal discomfort, cholelithiasis, urticaria, pulmonary embolism. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Ibuprofen and Liquid-Filled have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: Cardiovascular Thrombotic Events Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) cause an increased risk of serious cardiovascular thrombotic events, including myocardial infarction and stroke, which can be fatal. This risk may occur early in treatment and may increase with duration of use [see Warnings and Precautions ].

Do FAERS signals prove that Ibuprofen and Liquid-Filled causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.