Idarucizumab side effects: what 1,428 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Fragment
Brand names
Praxbind
Who reports
1,428 reports · 97% serious · 894 with death outcome · 44% female
Used for
PRAXBIND is indicated in patients treated with Pradaxa when reversal of the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran is needed: For emergency surgery/urgent procedures In life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding PRAXBIND is a humanized monoclonal antibody .
What it is
Idarucizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody fragment (Fab) derived from an IgG1 isotype molecule, whose target is the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. Using recombinant expression tec.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 24 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 4 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haemorrhage intracranial | 67 | 65.9 52.1–83.2ROR 69.1 · χ² 4,199 / p <1e-300 | 64.4 EB05 52.5 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 38.8 · 97% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Ischaemic stroke | 45 | 37.1 27.8–49.4ROR 38.2 · χ² 1,541 / p <1e-300 | 36.5 EB05 28.4 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 21.8 · 98% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome | 62 | 32.7 25.6–41.7ROR 34.1 · χ² 1,872 / p <1e-300 | 32.3 EB05 26.1 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 19.2 · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Cerebral haemorrhage | 79 | 32.5 26.2–40.3ROR 34.4 · χ² 2,380 / p <1e-300 | 32.2 EB05 26.7 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 19.2 · 97% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Coagulopathy | 31 | 27.4 19.4–38.9ROR 28.0 · χ² 763 / p 3e-168 | 27.0 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 16.9 · 94% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Cardiogenic shock | 22 | 22.7 15.0–34.3ROR 23.0 · χ² 434 / p 1e-96 | 22.2 EB05 15.4 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 13.4 | no trial data cached |
| Post procedural haemorrhage | 17 | 21.4 13.3–34.4ROR 21.7 · χ² 310 / p 9e-70 | 20.9 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 14.1 | no trial data cached |
| Rebound effect | 15 | 19.4 11.7–32.2ROR 19.6 · χ² 244 / p 2e-55 | 18.8 EB05 11.7 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious PRR 18.4 | no trial data cached |
| Brain oedema | 15 | 17.5 10.6–28.9ROR 17.6 · χ² 216 / p 3e-49 | 16.8 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.4 | no trial data cached |
| Cerebral infarction | 29 | 17.4 12.2–25.0ROR 17.8 · χ² 433 / p 2e-96 | 17.2 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.3 · 93% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Subarachnoid haemorrhage | 12 | 17.3 9.8–30.3ROR 17.4 · χ² 168 / p 1e-38 | 16.2 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.2 | no trial data cached |
| Haemorrhage | 119 | 16.7 14.1–19.9ROR 18.2 · χ² 1,751 / p <1e-300 | 16.7 EB05 14.3 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 12.0 · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Melaena (black stool) | 25 | 16.7 11.3–24.6ROR 16.9 · χ² 352 / p 6e-79 | 16.3 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.0 · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Shock | 24 | 15.5 10.4–23.0ROR 15.7 · χ² 310 / p 9e-70 | 15.0 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.2 · ♀ 22% (drug 44%) · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Subdural haematoma | 14 | 14.3 8.5–24.1ROR 14.5 · χ² 160 / p 5e-37 | 13.2 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 8.5 | no trial data cached |
| Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | 81 | 14.2 11.5–17.5ROR 14.9 · χ² 980 / p 2e-215 | 14.0 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 8.4 · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Hemiparesis | 16 | 13.8 8.5–22.5ROR 13.9 · χ² 177 / p 1e-40 | 12.8 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 8.8 | no trial data cached |
| Haematoma | 21 | 11.9 7.8–18.1ROR 12.0 · χ² 198 / p 3e-45 | 11.0 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 7.3 · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage | 13 | 11.3 6.6–19.4ROR 11.4 · χ² 112 / p 2e-26 | 9.8 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 6.7 | no trial data cached |
| Septic shock | 33 | 11.2 8.0–15.7ROR 11.5 · χ² 297 / p 6e-67 | 10.7 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 6.6 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Aphasia (loss of speech) | 20 | 9.7 6.3–15.0ROR 9.8 · χ² 148 / p 3e-34 | 8.7 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 6.8 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Circulatory collapse | 10 | 8.6 4.6–15.9ROR 8.6 · χ² 60 / p 6e-15 | 6.7 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 5.1 | no trial data cached |
| Haematemesis (vomiting blood) | 14 | 8.1 4.8–13.6ROR 8.2 · χ² 80 / p 2e-19 | 6.7 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 4.9 | no trial data cached |
| Peritonitis | 11 | 7.8 4.3–14.1ROR 7.9 · χ² 59 / p 9e-15 | 6.2 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 4.6 | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haemorrhage | 119 | 16.7 14.1–19.9ROR 18.2 · χ² 1,751 / p <1e-300 | 16.7 EB05 14.3 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 12.0 · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | 81 | 14.2 11.5–17.5ROR 14.9 · χ² 980 / p 2e-215 | 14.0 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 8.4 · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Cerebral haemorrhage | 79 | 32.5 26.2–40.3ROR 34.4 · χ² 2,380 / p <1e-300 | 32.2 EB05 26.7 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 19.2 · 97% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Haemorrhage intracranial | 67 | 65.9 52.1–83.2ROR 69.1 · χ² 4,199 / p <1e-300 | 64.4 EB05 52.5 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 38.8 · 97% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome | 62 | 32.7 25.6–41.7ROR 34.1 · χ² 1,872 / p <1e-300 | 32.3 EB05 26.1 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 19.2 · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Ischaemic stroke | 45 | 37.1 27.8–49.4ROR 38.2 · χ² 1,541 / p <1e-300 | 36.5 EB05 28.4 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 21.8 · 98% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Septic shock | 33 | 11.2 8.0–15.7ROR 11.5 · χ² 297 / p 6e-67 | 10.7 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 6.6 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Coagulopathy | 31 | 27.4 19.4–38.9ROR 28.0 · χ² 763 / p 3e-168 | 27.0 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 16.9 · 94% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Cerebral infarction | 29 | 17.4 12.2–25.0ROR 17.8 · χ² 433 / p 2e-96 | 17.2 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.3 · 93% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Melaena (black stool) | 25 | 16.7 11.3–24.6ROR 16.9 · χ² 352 / p 6e-79 | 16.3 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.0 · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Shock | 24 | 15.5 10.4–23.0ROR 15.7 · χ² 310 / p 9e-70 | 15.0 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.2 · ♀ 22% (drug 44%) · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Cardiogenic shock | 22 | 22.7 15.0–34.3ROR 23.0 · χ² 434 / p 1e-96 | 22.2 EB05 15.4 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 13.4 | no trial data cached |
| Haematoma | 21 | 11.9 7.8–18.1ROR 12.0 · χ² 198 / p 3e-45 | 11.0 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 7.3 · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Aphasia (loss of speech) | 20 | 9.7 6.3–15.0ROR 9.8 · χ² 148 / p 3e-34 | 8.7 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 6.8 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Post procedural haemorrhage | 17 | 21.4 13.3–34.4ROR 21.7 · χ² 310 / p 9e-70 | 20.9 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 14.1 | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Haemorrhage intracranial — n=67, PRR 65.9
- Ischaemic stroke — n=45, PRR 37.1
- Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome — n=62, PRR 32.7
- Cerebral haemorrhage — n=79, PRR 32.5
- Coagulopathy — n=31, PRR 27.4
- Cardiogenic shock — n=22, PRR 22.7
- Cerebral infarction — n=29, PRR 17.4
- Melaena — n=25, PRR 16.7
- Shock — n=24, PRR 15.5
- Gastrointestinal haemorrhage — n=81, PRR 14.2
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Idarucizumab?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Idarucizumab are haemorrhage, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, cerebral haemorrhage, haemorrhage intracranial, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, ischaemic stroke. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Idarucizumab have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Idarucizumab has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Idarucizumab causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID c7400f8a-dcf4-a6df-6d07-983081b1bf34, effective 20240123; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"IDARUCIZUMAB") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 28 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.