← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Idarucizumab side effects: what 1,428 FDA adverse event reports show

Idarucizumab · Praxbind · 28 reaction terms · 818 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Fragment

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Brand names

Praxbind

openFDA label

Who reports

1,428 reports · 97% serious · 894 with death outcome · 44% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

PRAXBIND is indicated in patients treated with Pradaxa when reversal of the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran is needed: For emergency surgery/urgent procedures In life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding PRAXBIND is a humanized monoclonal antibody .

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Idarucizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody fragment (Fab) derived from an IgG1 isotype molecule, whose target is the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. Using recombinant expression tec.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 24 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 1Not in label — unassessed 21
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 4 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Haemorrhage intracranial6765.9
52.1–83.2ROR 69.1 · χ² 4,199 / p <1e-300
64.4 EB05 52.5 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 38.8 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Ischaemic stroke4537.1
27.8–49.4ROR 38.2 · χ² 1,541 / p <1e-300
36.5 EB05 28.4 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 21.8 · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome6232.7
25.6–41.7ROR 34.1 · χ² 1,872 / p <1e-300
32.3 EB05 26.1 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.2 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Cerebral haemorrhage7932.5
26.2–40.3ROR 34.4 · χ² 2,380 / p <1e-300
32.2 EB05 26.7 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.2 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Coagulopathy3127.4
19.4–38.9ROR 28.0 · χ² 763 / p 3e-168
27.0 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.9 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Cardiogenic shock2222.7
15.0–34.3ROR 23.0 · χ² 434 / p 1e-96
22.2 EB05 15.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.4no trial data cached
Post procedural haemorrhage1721.4
13.3–34.4ROR 21.7 · χ² 310 / p 9e-70
20.9 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 14.1no trial data cached
Rebound effect1519.4
11.7–32.2ROR 19.6 · χ² 244 / p 2e-55
18.8 EB05 11.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 18.4no trial data cached
Brain oedema1517.5
10.6–28.9ROR 17.6 · χ² 216 / p 3e-49
16.8 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.4no trial data cached
Cerebral infarction2917.4
12.2–25.0ROR 17.8 · χ² 433 / p 2e-96
17.2 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.3 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Subarachnoid haemorrhage1217.3
9.8–30.3ROR 17.4 · χ² 168 / p 1e-38
16.2 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.2no trial data cached
Melaena (black stool)2516.7
11.3–24.6ROR 16.9 · χ² 352 / p 6e-79
16.3 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.0 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Shock2415.5
10.4–23.0ROR 15.7 · χ² 310 / p 9e-70
15.0 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.2 · ♀ 22% (drug 44%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Subdural haematoma1414.3
8.5–24.1ROR 14.5 · χ² 160 / p 5e-37
13.2 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.5no trial data cached
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage8114.2
11.5–17.5ROR 14.9 · χ² 980 / p 2e-215
14.0 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.4 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Hemiparesis1613.8
8.5–22.5ROR 13.9 · χ² 177 / p 1e-40
12.8 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.8no trial data cached
Haematoma2111.9
7.8–18.1ROR 12.0 · χ² 198 / p 3e-45
11.0 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.3 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage1311.3
6.6–19.4ROR 11.4 · χ² 112 / p 2e-26
9.8 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.7no trial data cached
Septic shock3311.2
8.0–15.7ROR 11.5 · χ² 297 / p 6e-67
10.7 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.6 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Aphasia (loss of speech)209.7
6.3–15.0ROR 9.8 · χ² 148 / p 3e-34
8.7 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.8 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Circulatory collapse108.6
4.6–15.9ROR 8.6 · χ² 60 / p 6e-15
6.7 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.1no trial data cached
Haematemesis (vomiting blood)148.1
4.8–13.6ROR 8.2 · χ² 80 / p 2e-19
6.7 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.9no trial data cached
Peritonitis117.8
4.3–14.1ROR 7.9 · χ² 59 / p 9e-15
6.2 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage8114.2
11.5–17.5ROR 14.9 · χ² 980 / p 2e-215
14.0 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.4 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Cerebral haemorrhage7932.5
26.2–40.3ROR 34.4 · χ² 2,380 / p <1e-300
32.2 EB05 26.7 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.2 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Haemorrhage intracranial6765.9
52.1–83.2ROR 69.1 · χ² 4,199 / p <1e-300
64.4 EB05 52.5 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 38.8 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome6232.7
25.6–41.7ROR 34.1 · χ² 1,872 / p <1e-300
32.3 EB05 26.1 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.2 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Ischaemic stroke4537.1
27.8–49.4ROR 38.2 · χ² 1,541 / p <1e-300
36.5 EB05 28.4 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 21.8 · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Septic shock3311.2
8.0–15.7ROR 11.5 · χ² 297 / p 6e-67
10.7 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.6 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Coagulopathy3127.4
19.4–38.9ROR 28.0 · χ² 763 / p 3e-168
27.0 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.9 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Cerebral infarction2917.4
12.2–25.0ROR 17.8 · χ² 433 / p 2e-96
17.2 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.3 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Melaena (black stool)2516.7
11.3–24.6ROR 16.9 · χ² 352 / p 6e-79
16.3 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.0 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Shock2415.5
10.4–23.0ROR 15.7 · χ² 310 / p 9e-70
15.0 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.2 · ♀ 22% (drug 44%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Cardiogenic shock2222.7
15.0–34.3ROR 23.0 · χ² 434 / p 1e-96
22.2 EB05 15.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.4no trial data cached
Haematoma2111.9
7.8–18.1ROR 12.0 · χ² 198 / p 3e-45
11.0 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.3 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Aphasia (loss of speech)209.7
6.3–15.0ROR 9.8 · χ² 148 / p 3e-34
8.7 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.8 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Post procedural haemorrhage1721.4
13.3–34.4ROR 21.7 · χ² 310 / p 9e-70
20.9 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 14.1no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Idarucizumab?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Idarucizumab are haemorrhage, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, cerebral haemorrhage, haemorrhage intracranial, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, ischaemic stroke. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Idarucizumab have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Idarucizumab has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Idarucizumab causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.