← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Imipenem and Cilastatin side effects: what 1,694 FDA adverse event reports show

Imipenem And Cilastatin · 70 reaction terms · 1,110 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Penem Antibacterial

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Who reports

1,694 reports · 96% serious · 396 with death outcome · 42% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Imipenem and Cilastatin for Injection, USP for intravenous use is a combination of imipenem, a penem antibacterial, and cilastatin, a renal dehydropeptidase inhibitor, indicated for the treatment of the following serious infections caused by designated susceptible bacteria: • Lower respiratory tract infections. ( 1.1 ) • Urinary tract infections. ( 1.2 ) • Intra-abdominal infections.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Imipenem and Cilastatin for Injection, USP is a sterile formulation of imipenem, a penem antibacterial, and cilastatin, a renal dehydropeptidase inhibitor with sodium bicarbonate added as a buffer. Imipenem and Cilastatin for Injection, USP is an antibacterial drug for intravenous administration.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 6Labeled (related wording) 5Likely indication confounding 4Reporting / coding artifact 4Lab value / disease marker 4Not in label — unassessed 17
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 30 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Toxic skin eruption2227.0
17.8–40.9ROR 27.3 · χ² 524 / p 2e-116
26.4 EB05 18.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.1no trial data cached
Electrocardiogram qt prolonged6422.0
17.3–28.0ROR 22.9 · χ² 1,265 / p 2e-277
21.9 EB05 17.7 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 13.4no trial data cached
Drug resistance4119.8
14.6–26.8ROR 20.3 · χ² 712 / p 3e-157
19.6 EB05 15.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.0 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Neutrophil count increased1518.1
10.9–29.9ROR 18.2 · χ² 225 / p 3e-51
17.4 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 11.9no trial data cached
Epilepsy4217.1
12.7–23.0ROR 17.5 · χ² 619 / p 6e-137
16.9 EB05 12.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.2 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Rash maculo-papular3016.8
11.8–23.9ROR 17.1 · χ² 429 / p 1e-95
16.5 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.1 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Nephropathy toxic1516.7
10.1–27.6ROR 16.8 · χ² 206 / p 6e-47
15.9 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.5no trial data cached
Septic shock5315.2
11.7–19.8ROR 15.7 · χ² 689 / p 3e-152
15.0 EB05 11.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 9.1 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome3415.1
10.8–21.1ROR 15.4 · χ² 434 / p 1e-96
14.8 EB05 10.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.0 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms2914.1
9.8–20.2ROR 14.3 · χ² 339 / p 5e-76
13.7 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.4 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Tuberculosis1413.5
8.0–22.7ROR 13.6 · χ² 150 / p 1e-34
12.3 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.2no trial data cached
Eosinophilia1913.5
8.6–21.1ROR 13.6 · χ² 207 / p 3e-47
12.7 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.4no trial data cached
Lymphocyte count decreased1913.3
8.5–20.8ROR 13.4 · χ² 204 / p 1e-46
12.5 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 9.2no trial data cached
Toxic epidermal necrolysis (severe skin peeling reaction)1613.1
8.1–21.4ROR 13.3 · χ² 168 / p 1e-38
12.1 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Blood urea increased1712.5
7.8–20.1ROR 12.6 · χ² 169 / p 7e-39
11.5 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 7.8no trial data cached
Acute respiratory distress syndrome1611.2
6.9–18.2ROR 11.3 · χ² 139 / p 3e-32
10.0 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.7no trial data cached
Cytomegalovirus infection1410.4
6.2–17.6ROR 10.5 · χ² 110 / p 5e-26
8.9 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Myoclonus1010.4
5.6–19.3ROR 10.4 · χ² 76 / p 2e-18
8.3 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.6no trial data cached
Drug-induced liver injury2510.0
6.8–14.8ROR 10.2 · χ² 195 / p 2e-44
9.2 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Agranulocytosis (severe loss of white cells)149.4
5.6–15.8ROR 9.4 · χ² 97 / p 4e-23
7.9 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.6no trial data cached
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure129.1
5.2–16.0ROR 9.1 · χ² 78 / p 4e-19
7.4 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Device related infection118.8
4.9–15.9ROR 8.9 · χ² 69 / p 6e-17
7.0 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.4no trial data cached
Neurotoxicity128.6
4.9–15.0ROR 8.6 · χ² 73 / p 8e-18
6.9 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.2no trial data cached
Encephalopathy168.1
5.0–13.2ROR 8.2 · χ² 92 / p 3e-22
6.9 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.9no trial data cached
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)707.8
6.2–9.8ROR 8.1 · χ² 408 / p 4e-91
7.5 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.8 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
White blood cell count increased247.7
5.2–11.5ROR 7.8 · χ² 134 / p 3e-31
6.9 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 5.3no trial data cached
Altered state of consciousness137.5
4.3–12.8ROR 7.5 · χ² 67 / p 2e-16
6.1 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.5no trial data cached
Candida infection (yeast infection)107.4
4.0–13.8ROR 7.5 · χ² 49 / p 1e-12
5.8 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Hypocalcaemia (low calcium)117.2
4.0–13.0ROR 7.3 · χ² 53 / p 2e-13
5.8 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached
Incorrect product administration duration116.7
3.7–12.1ROR 6.7 · χ² 48 / p 2e-12
5.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=10no trial data cached
Hepatic function abnormal206.7
4.3–10.3ROR 6.7 · χ² 91 / p 7e-22
5.9 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 4.1 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Cholestasis (bile flow blockage)106.5
3.5–12.0ROR 6.5 · χ² 41 / p 7e-11
5.2 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.9no trial data cached
Leukopenia (low white blood cells)256.2
4.2–9.2ROR 6.3 · χ² 104 / p 9e-25
5.6 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.8no trial data cached
Treatment failure385.7
4.2–7.9ROR 5.8 · χ² 144 / p 2e-33
5.4 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.2 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Pancreatitis acute105.5
3.0–10.3ROR 5.6 · χ² 33 / p 5e-9
4.5 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.3no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)707.8
6.2–9.8ROR 8.1 · χ² 408 / p 4e-91
7.5 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.8 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Electrocardiogram qt prolonged6422.0
17.3–28.0ROR 22.9 · χ² 1,265 / p 2e-277
21.9 EB05 17.7 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 13.4no trial data cached
Septic shock5315.2
11.7–19.8ROR 15.7 · χ² 689 / p 3e-152
15.0 EB05 11.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 9.1 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Epilepsy4217.1
12.7–23.0ROR 17.5 · χ² 619 / p 6e-137
16.9 EB05 12.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.2 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug resistance4119.8
14.6–26.8ROR 20.3 · χ² 712 / p 3e-157
19.6 EB05 15.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.0 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Treatment failure385.7
4.2–7.9ROR 5.8 · χ² 144 / p 2e-33
5.4 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.2 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome3415.1
10.8–21.1ROR 15.4 · χ² 434 / p 1e-96
14.8 EB05 10.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.0 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Rash maculo-papular3016.8
11.8–23.9ROR 17.1 · χ² 429 / p 1e-95
16.5 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.1 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms2914.1
9.8–20.2ROR 14.3 · χ² 339 / p 5e-76
13.7 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.4 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Leukopenia (low white blood cells)256.2
4.2–9.2ROR 6.3 · χ² 104 / p 9e-25
5.6 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.8no trial data cached
Drug-induced liver injury2510.0
6.8–14.8ROR 10.2 · χ² 195 / p 2e-44
9.2 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
White blood cell count increased247.7
5.2–11.5ROR 7.8 · χ² 134 / p 3e-31
6.9 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 5.3no trial data cached
Toxic skin eruption2227.0
17.8–40.9ROR 27.3 · χ² 524 / p 2e-116
26.4 EB05 18.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.1no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Imipenem and Cilastatin?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Imipenem and Cilastatin are thrombocytopenia, electrocardiogram qt prolonged, septic shock, respiratory failure, epilepsy, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Imipenem and Cilastatin have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Imipenem and Cilastatin has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Imipenem and Cilastatin causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.