← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Imipramine side effects: what 560 FDA adverse event reports show

Imipramine Hydrochloride · 14 reaction terms · 195 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Imipramine Hydrochloride (Imipramine Hydrochloride)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

560 reports · 71% serious · 30 with death outcome · 69% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Depression - For the relief of symptoms of depression. Endogenous depression is more likely to be alleviated than other depressive states. One to three weeks of treatment may be needed before optimal therapeutic effects are evident. Childhood Enuresis .

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Imipramine hydrochloride tablets USP are supplied in tablet form for oral administration. Imipramine hydrochloride USP, the original tricyclic antidepressant, are a member of the dibenzazepine group of compounds.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

Suicidality and Antidepressant Drugs Antidepressants increased the risk compared to placebo of suicidal thinking and behavior (suicidality) in children, adolescents , and young adults in short-term studies of major depressive disorder (MDD) and other psychiatric disorders.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 12 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 1Not in label — unassessed 10
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 2 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hallucination, auditory2866.0
46.0–94.7ROR 69.4 · χ² 1,726 / p <1e-300
63.2 EB05 45.9 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 61.5 · ♀ 96% (drug 69%)no trial data cached
Decreased activity1656.0
34.5–90.8ROR 57.6 · χ² 809 / p 3e-178
52.6 EB05 34.3 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 68.0no trial data cached
Paranoia2554.1
36.9–79.4ROR 56.6 · χ² 1,250 / p 4e-274
52.0 EB05 37.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 54.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 69%)no trial data cached
Psychotic disorder2835.5
24.8–51.0ROR 37.3 · χ² 906 / p 3e-199
34.7 EB05 25.2 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 31.2 · ♀ 96% (drug 69%)no trial data cached
Sleep apnoea syndrome1325.5
14.9–43.6ROR 26.0 · χ² 282 / p 2e-63
24.6 EB05 15.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.7no trial data cached
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome825.2
12.7–50.2ROR 25.6 · χ² 163 / p 2e-37
23.4 EB05 11.9 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.3no trial data cached
Frequent bowel movements1622.3
13.7–36.1ROR 22.9 · χ² 304 / p 2e-68
21.7 EB05 14.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 27.8no trial data cached
Colitis1918.9
12.1–29.4ROR 19.5 · χ² 305 / p 1e-68
18.4 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.4no trial data cached
Carpal tunnel syndrome616.0
7.2–35.5ROR 16.2 · χ² 70 / p 3e-17
12.5 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.0no trial data cached
Colitis ulcerative1916.0
10.3–24.8ROR 16.5 · χ² 252 / p 5e-57
15.4 EB05 10.0 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.9no trial data cached
Tendon rupture (torn tendon)515.1
6.3–36.2ROR 15.3 · χ² 53 / p 2e-13
10.7 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.4no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Psychotic disorder2835.5
24.8–51.0ROR 37.3 · χ² 906 / p 3e-199
34.7 EB05 25.2 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 31.2 · ♀ 96% (drug 69%)no trial data cached
Hallucination, auditory2866.0
46.0–94.7ROR 69.4 · χ² 1,726 / p <1e-300
63.2 EB05 45.9 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 61.5 · ♀ 96% (drug 69%)no trial data cached
Paranoia2554.1
36.9–79.4ROR 56.6 · χ² 1,250 / p 4e-274
52.0 EB05 37.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 54.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 69%)no trial data cached
Colitis ulcerative1916.0
10.3–24.8ROR 16.5 · χ² 252 / p 5e-57
15.4 EB05 10.0 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.9no trial data cached
Colitis1918.9
12.1–29.4ROR 19.5 · χ² 305 / p 1e-68
18.4 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.4no trial data cached
Frequent bowel movements1622.3
13.7–36.1ROR 22.9 · χ² 304 / p 2e-68
21.7 EB05 14.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 27.8no trial data cached
Decreased activity1656.0
34.5–90.8ROR 57.6 · χ² 809 / p 3e-178
52.6 EB05 34.3 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 68.0no trial data cached
Sleep apnoea syndrome1325.5
14.9–43.6ROR 26.0 · χ² 282 / p 2e-63
24.6 EB05 15.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.7no trial data cached
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome825.2
12.7–50.2ROR 25.6 · χ² 163 / p 2e-37
23.4 EB05 11.9 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.3no trial data cached
Carpal tunnel syndrome616.0
7.2–35.5ROR 16.2 · χ² 70 / p 3e-17
12.5 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.0no trial data cached
Tendon rupture (torn tendon)515.1
6.3–36.2ROR 15.3 · χ² 53 / p 2e-13
10.7 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.4no trial data cached
Parkinsonism415.4
5.8–40.8ROR 15.5 · χ² 40 / p 1e-10
9.6 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.8no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Imipramine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Imipramine are psychotic disorder, hallucination, auditory, paranoia, colitis ulcerative, colitis, frequent bowel movements. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Imipramine have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: Suicidality and Antidepressant Drugs Antidepressants increased the risk compared to placebo of suicidal thinking and behavior (suicidality) in children, adolescents , and young adults in short-term studies of major depressive disorder (MDD) and other psychiatric disorders.

Do FAERS signals prove that Imipramine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.