I.V. Fat Emulsion side effects: what 721 FDA adverse event reports show
Brand names
Intralipid
Who reports
721 reports · 86% serious · 85 with death outcome · 58% female
Used for
Intralipid ® is indicated as a source of calories and essential fatty acids for adult and pediatric patients requiring parenteral nutrition (PN) and as a source of essential fatty acids for prevention of essential fatty acid deficiency (EFAD). Intralip.
What it is
Intralipid is a sterile, non-pyrogenic, white, homogenous lipid emulsion for intravenous infusion as a source of calories and essential fatty acids. The lipid content of Intralipid is 0.2 g/mL and comprises soybean oil. The phosphate content is 15 mmol/L.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 19 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 2 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature intolerance | 16 | 45.6 28.1–74.1ROR 46.7 · χ² 654 / p 2e-144 | 43.4 EB05 28.3 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=16 | no trial data cached |
| Tachypnoea | 19 | 40.8 26.2–63.7ROR 41.9 · χ² 699 / p 3e-154 | 39.3 EB05 26.6 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 28.1 | no trial data cached |
| Toxic epidermal necrolysis (severe skin peeling reaction) | 19 | 36.7 23.5–57.2ROR 37.7 · χ² 624 / p 5e-138 | 35.5 EB05 24.0 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 24.6 | no trial data cached |
| Bacteraemia | 11 | 27.2 15.1–48.9ROR 27.6 · χ² 252 / p 5e-57 | 26.0 EB05 15.3 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 18.4 | no trial data cached |
| Drug dispensing error | 14 | 26.3 15.7–44.2ROR 26.8 · χ² 316 / p 6e-71 | 25.4 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | – | no trial data cached |
| Chills | 75 | 18.6 15.0–23.0ROR 20.6 · χ² 1,237 / p 3e-271 | 18.5 EB05 15.2 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 19.3 · 97% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Product preparation error | 13 | 18.3 10.7–31.3ROR 18.6 · χ² 195 / p 1e-44 | 17.4 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=13 | no trial data cached |
| Fistula | 7 | 18.1 8.6–37.8ROR 18.2 · χ² 96 / p 4e-23 | 15.5 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 12.8 | no trial data cached |
| Cholestasis (bile flow blockage) | 11 | 16.8 9.3–30.1ROR 17.0 · χ² 148 / p 3e-34 | 15.5 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 9.3 | no trial data cached |
| Shock | 13 | 16.6 9.7–28.4ROR 16.9 · χ² 175 / p 3e-40 | 15.6 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 11.1 | no trial data cached |
| Metabolic acidosis | 16 | 14.7 9.1–23.9ROR 15.0 · χ² 191 / p 9e-44 | 13.9 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 9.3 | no trial data cached |
| Hyperbilirubinaemia | 5 | 14.1 5.9–33.8ROR 14.2 · χ² 49 / p 2e-12 | 9.7 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 7.7 | no trial data cached |
| Insurance issue | 7 | 13.7 6.6–28.7ROR 13.8 · χ² 70 / p 3e-17 | 10.7 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 19.0 | no trial data cached |
| Anaphylactic shock | 12 | 13.6 7.8–23.9ROR 13.8 · χ² 128 / p 5e-30 | 12.2 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.2 | no trial data cached |
| Status epilepticus | 5 | 12.9 5.4–30.8ROR 12.9 · χ² 43 / p 2e-11 | 8.5 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 8.6 | no trial data cached |
| Complication associated with device | 5 | 11.0 4.6–26.4ROR 11.1 · χ² 36 / p 1e-9 | 7.1 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 9.6 | no trial data cached |
| Intentional overdose | 19 | 8.7 5.6–13.5ROR 8.9 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28 | 7.6 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 6.0 | no trial data cached |
| Exposure during pregnancy | 15 | 7.0 4.3–11.6ROR 7.1 · χ² 72 / p 1e-17 | 5.9 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 7.1 | no trial data cached |
| Needle issue | 5 | 5.1 2.1–12.2ROR 5.1 · χ² 13 / p 2e-4 | 3.7 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.3 | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=5 | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chills | 75 | 18.6 15.0–23.0ROR 20.6 · χ² 1,237 / p 3e-271 | 18.5 EB05 15.2 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 19.3 · 97% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Intentional overdose | 19 | 8.7 5.6–13.5ROR 8.9 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28 | 7.6 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 6.0 | no trial data cached |
| Toxic epidermal necrolysis (severe skin peeling reaction) | 19 | 36.7 23.5–57.2ROR 37.7 · χ² 624 / p 5e-138 | 35.5 EB05 24.0 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 24.6 | no trial data cached |
| Tachypnoea | 19 | 40.8 26.2–63.7ROR 41.9 · χ² 699 / p 3e-154 | 39.3 EB05 26.6 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 28.1 | no trial data cached |
| Metabolic acidosis | 16 | 14.7 9.1–23.9ROR 15.0 · χ² 191 / p 9e-44 | 13.9 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 9.3 | no trial data cached |
| Temperature intolerance | 16 | 45.6 28.1–74.1ROR 46.7 · χ² 654 / p 2e-144 | 43.4 EB05 28.3 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=16 | no trial data cached |
| Exposure during pregnancy | 15 | 7.0 4.3–11.6ROR 7.1 · χ² 72 / p 1e-17 | 5.9 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 7.1 | no trial data cached |
| Drug dispensing error | 14 | 26.3 15.7–44.2ROR 26.8 · χ² 316 / p 6e-71 | 25.4 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | – | no trial data cached |
| Shock | 13 | 16.6 9.7–28.4ROR 16.9 · χ² 175 / p 3e-40 | 15.6 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 11.1 | no trial data cached |
| Product preparation error | 13 | 18.3 10.7–31.3ROR 18.6 · χ² 195 / p 1e-44 | 17.4 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=13 | no trial data cached |
| Anaphylactic shock | 12 | 13.6 7.8–23.9ROR 13.8 · χ² 128 / p 5e-30 | 12.2 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.2 | no trial data cached |
| Cholestasis (bile flow blockage) | 11 | 16.8 9.3–30.1ROR 17.0 · χ² 148 / p 3e-34 | 15.5 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 9.3 | no trial data cached |
| Bacteraemia | 11 | 27.2 15.1–48.9ROR 27.6 · χ² 252 / p 5e-57 | 26.0 EB05 15.3 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 18.4 | no trial data cached |
| Insurance issue | 7 | 13.7 6.6–28.7ROR 13.8 · χ² 70 / p 3e-17 | 10.7 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 19.0 | no trial data cached |
| Fistula | 7 | 18.1 8.6–37.8ROR 18.2 · χ² 96 / p 4e-23 | 15.5 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 12.8 | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of I.V. Fat Emulsion?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for I.V. Fat Emulsion are chills, toxic epidermal necrolysis, tachypnoea, metabolic acidosis, temperature intolerance, shock. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does I.V. Fat Emulsion have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for I.V. Fat Emulsion has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that I.V. Fat Emulsion causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 61e025f1-a38e-4af2-9e18-13ea12977cf5, effective 20251119; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"I.V. FAT EMULSION") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 21 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.