← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

I.V. Fat Emulsion side effects: what 721 FDA adverse event reports show

I.V. Fat Emulsion · Intralipid · 21 reaction terms · 294 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Lipid Emulsion

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Intralipid

openFDA label

Who reports

721 reports · 86% serious · 85 with death outcome · 58% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Intralipid ® is indicated as a source of calories and essential fatty acids for adult and pediatric patients requiring parenteral nutrition (PN) and as a source of essential fatty acids for prevention of essential fatty acid deficiency (EFAD). Intralip.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Intralipid is a sterile, non-pyrogenic, white, homogenous lipid emulsion for intravenous infusion as a source of calories and essential fatty acids. The lipid content of Intralipid is 0.2 g/mL and comprises soybean oil. The phosphate content is 15 mmol/L.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 19 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 1Reporting / coding artifact 4Not in label — unassessed 11
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 2 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Temperature intolerance1645.6
28.1–74.1ROR 46.7 · χ² 654 / p 2e-144
43.4 EB05 28.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Tachypnoea1940.8
26.2–63.7ROR 41.9 · χ² 699 / p 3e-154
39.3 EB05 26.6 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.1no trial data cached
Toxic epidermal necrolysis (severe skin peeling reaction)1936.7
23.5–57.2ROR 37.7 · χ² 624 / p 5e-138
35.5 EB05 24.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.6no trial data cached
Bacteraemia1127.2
15.1–48.9ROR 27.6 · χ² 252 / p 5e-57
26.0 EB05 15.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.4no trial data cached
Drug dispensing error1426.3
15.7–44.2ROR 26.8 · χ² 316 / p 6e-71
25.4 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Chills7518.6
15.0–23.0ROR 20.6 · χ² 1,237 / p 3e-271
18.5 EB05 15.2 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 19.3 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Product preparation error1318.3
10.7–31.3ROR 18.6 · χ² 195 / p 1e-44
17.4 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=13no trial data cached
Fistula718.1
8.6–37.8ROR 18.2 · χ² 96 / p 4e-23
15.5 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.8no trial data cached
Cholestasis (bile flow blockage)1116.8
9.3–30.1ROR 17.0 · χ² 148 / p 3e-34
15.5 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 9.3no trial data cached
Shock1316.6
9.7–28.4ROR 16.9 · χ² 175 / p 3e-40
15.6 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.1no trial data cached
Metabolic acidosis1614.7
9.1–23.9ROR 15.0 · χ² 191 / p 9e-44
13.9 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 9.3no trial data cached
Hyperbilirubinaemia514.1
5.9–33.8ROR 14.2 · χ² 49 / p 2e-12
9.7 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.7no trial data cached
Insurance issue713.7
6.6–28.7ROR 13.8 · χ² 70 / p 3e-17
10.7 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.0no trial data cached
Anaphylactic shock1213.6
7.8–23.9ROR 13.8 · χ² 128 / p 5e-30
12.2 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.2no trial data cached
Status epilepticus512.9
5.4–30.8ROR 12.9 · χ² 43 / p 2e-11
8.5 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.6no trial data cached
Intentional overdose198.7
5.6–13.5ROR 8.9 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28
7.6 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Exposure during pregnancy157.0
4.3–11.6ROR 7.1 · χ² 72 / p 1e-17
5.9 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.1no trial data cached
Needle issue55.1
2.1–12.2ROR 5.1 · χ² 13 / p 2e-4
3.7 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.3Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Chills7518.6
15.0–23.0ROR 20.6 · χ² 1,237 / p 3e-271
18.5 EB05 15.2 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 19.3 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Intentional overdose198.7
5.6–13.5ROR 8.9 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28
7.6 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Toxic epidermal necrolysis (severe skin peeling reaction)1936.7
23.5–57.2ROR 37.7 · χ² 624 / p 5e-138
35.5 EB05 24.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.6no trial data cached
Tachypnoea1940.8
26.2–63.7ROR 41.9 · χ² 699 / p 3e-154
39.3 EB05 26.6 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.1no trial data cached
Metabolic acidosis1614.7
9.1–23.9ROR 15.0 · χ² 191 / p 9e-44
13.9 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 9.3no trial data cached
Temperature intolerance1645.6
28.1–74.1ROR 46.7 · χ² 654 / p 2e-144
43.4 EB05 28.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Exposure during pregnancy157.0
4.3–11.6ROR 7.1 · χ² 72 / p 1e-17
5.9 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.1no trial data cached
Drug dispensing error1426.3
15.7–44.2ROR 26.8 · χ² 316 / p 6e-71
25.4 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Shock1316.6
9.7–28.4ROR 16.9 · χ² 175 / p 3e-40
15.6 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.1no trial data cached
Product preparation error1318.3
10.7–31.3ROR 18.6 · χ² 195 / p 1e-44
17.4 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=13no trial data cached
Anaphylactic shock1213.6
7.8–23.9ROR 13.8 · χ² 128 / p 5e-30
12.2 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.2no trial data cached
Cholestasis (bile flow blockage)1116.8
9.3–30.1ROR 17.0 · χ² 148 / p 3e-34
15.5 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 9.3no trial data cached
Bacteraemia1127.2
15.1–48.9ROR 27.6 · χ² 252 / p 5e-57
26.0 EB05 15.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.4no trial data cached
Insurance issue713.7
6.6–28.7ROR 13.8 · χ² 70 / p 3e-17
10.7 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.0no trial data cached
Fistula718.1
8.6–37.8ROR 18.2 · χ² 96 / p 4e-23
15.5 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.8no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of I.V. Fat Emulsion?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for I.V. Fat Emulsion are chills, toxic epidermal necrolysis, tachypnoea, metabolic acidosis, temperature intolerance, shock. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does I.V. Fat Emulsion have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for I.V. Fat Emulsion has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that I.V. Fat Emulsion causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.