← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Lecanemab side effects: what 3,522 FDA adverse event reports show

Lecanemab · Lecanemab Autoinjector, Leqembi · 34 reaction terms · 2,013 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Amyloid Beta-directed Antibody

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Brand names

Lecanemab Autoinjector, Leqembi

openFDA label

Who reports

3,522 reports · 43% serious · 154 with death outcome · 59% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

LEQEMBI is indicated for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Treatment with LEQEMBI should be initiated in patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia stage of disease, the population in which treatment was initiated in clinical trials. LEQEMBI is an amyloid beta-directed antibody indicated for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Lecanemab-irmb is a recombinant humanized immunoglobulin gamma 1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody directed against aggregated soluble and insoluble forms of amyloid beta, and is expressed in a Chinese hamster ovary cell line. Lecanemab-irmb has an approximate molecular weight of 150 kDa.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

AMYLOID RELATED IMAGING ABNORMALITIES Monoclonal antibodies directed against aggregated forms of beta amyloid, including LEQEMBI, can cause amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), characterized as ARIA with edema (ARIA-E) and ARIA with hemosiderin deposition (ARIA-H). Incidence and timing of ARIA vary among treatments.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 25 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 2Labeled adverse reaction 5Labeled (related wording) 3Likely indication confounding 1Not in label — unassessed 14
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 9 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Cerebral haemorrhage12119.9
16.7–23.7ROR 20.6 · χ² 2,150 / p <1e-300
19.8 EB05 17.0 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 22.2no trial data cached
Cerebral infarction7818.8
15.1–23.4ROR 19.2 · χ² 1,291 / p 5e-283
18.6 EB05 15.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 25.5 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Brain oedema3014.0
9.8–19.9ROR 14.1 · χ² 348 / p 7e-78
13.6 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 11.5no trial data cached
Chills24112.1
10.7–13.6ROR 12.9 · χ² 2,442 / p <1e-300
12.0 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Subdural haematoma2811.4
7.9–16.6ROR 11.5 · χ² 256 / p 5e-58
10.8 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.8 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Feeling cold428.8
6.5–11.9ROR 8.9 · χ² 284 / p 5e-64
8.3 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.4no trial data cached
Subarachnoid haemorrhage116.3
3.5–11.4ROR 6.3 · χ² 44 / p 2e-11
5.1 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Status epilepticus126.2
3.5–11.0ROR 6.2 · χ² 47 / p 3e-12
5.1 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.5no trial data cached
Influenza like illness (flu-like illness)745.3
4.2–6.6ROR 5.3 · χ² 251 / p 6e-57
5.1 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.3no trial data cached
Ischaemic stroke154.9
3.0–8.2ROR 4.9 · χ² 43 / p 3e-11
4.3 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 6.7no trial data cached
Head discomfort144.7
2.8–7.9ROR 4.7 · χ² 37 / p 7e-10
4.1 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.6no trial data cached
Headache4774.5
4.1–4.9ROR 5.0 · χ² 1,320 / p 3e-289
4.4 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.2no trial data cached
Aphasia (loss of speech)234.5
3.0–6.7ROR 4.5 · χ² 58 / p 1e-14
4.1 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.8no trial data cached
Disorientation304.4
3.1–6.3ROR 4.5 · χ² 76 / p 1e-18
4.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.7no trial data cached
Cognitive disorder344.3
3.1–6.0ROR 4.3 · χ² 83 / p 5e-20
4.1 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 3.1no trial data cached
Tremor (shaking)893.1
2.6–3.9ROR 3.2 · χ² 129 / p 4e-30
3.1 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.0no trial data cached
Fracture103.1
1.7–5.8ROR 3.1 · χ² 12 / p 2e-4
2.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached
Lethargy293.0
2.1–4.3ROR 3.0 · χ² 36 / p 1e-9
2.9 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.9no trial data cached
Seizure552.8
2.2–3.7ROR 2.8 · χ² 63 / p 1e-15
2.8 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Hypersomnia132.7
1.5–4.6ROR 2.7 · χ² 12 / p 3e-4
2.5 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.0no trial data cached
Hallucination (hallucinations)302.3
1.6–3.4ROR 2.4 · χ² 22 / p 1e-6
2.3 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.1no trial data cached
Pancreatic carcinoma102.0
1.1–3.7ROR 2.0 · χ² 4 / p 0.021
1.9 EB05 1.1 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.8no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Headache4774.5
4.1–4.9ROR 5.0 · χ² 1,320 / p 3e-289
4.4 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.2no trial data cached
Chills24112.1
10.7–13.6ROR 12.9 · χ² 2,442 / p <1e-300
12.0 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Cerebral haemorrhage12119.9
16.7–23.7ROR 20.6 · χ² 2,150 / p <1e-300
19.8 EB05 17.0 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 22.2no trial data cached
Tremor (shaking)893.1
2.6–3.9ROR 3.2 · χ² 129 / p 4e-30
3.1 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.0no trial data cached
Cerebral infarction7818.8
15.1–23.4ROR 19.2 · χ² 1,291 / p 5e-283
18.6 EB05 15.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 25.5 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Influenza like illness (flu-like illness)745.3
4.2–6.6ROR 5.3 · χ² 251 / p 6e-57
5.1 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.3no trial data cached
Seizure552.8
2.2–3.7ROR 2.8 · χ² 63 / p 1e-15
2.8 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Feeling cold428.8
6.5–11.9ROR 8.9 · χ² 284 / p 5e-64
8.3 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.4no trial data cached
Cognitive disorder344.3
3.1–6.0ROR 4.3 · χ² 83 / p 5e-20
4.1 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 3.1no trial data cached
Hallucination (hallucinations)302.3
1.6–3.4ROR 2.4 · χ² 22 / p 1e-6
2.3 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.1no trial data cached
Disorientation304.4
3.1–6.3ROR 4.5 · χ² 76 / p 1e-18
4.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.7no trial data cached
Brain oedema3014.0
9.8–19.9ROR 14.1 · χ² 348 / p 7e-78
13.6 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 11.5no trial data cached
Lethargy293.0
2.1–4.3ROR 3.0 · χ² 36 / p 1e-9
2.9 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.9no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Lecanemab?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Lecanemab are headache, infusion related reaction, chills, confusional state, cerebral haemorrhage, tremor. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Lecanemab have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: AMYLOID RELATED IMAGING ABNORMALITIES Monoclonal antibodies directed against aggregated forms of beta amyloid, including LEQEMBI, can cause amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), characterized as ARIA with edema (ARIA-E) and ARIA with hemosiderin deposition (ARIA-H). Incidence and timing of ARIA vary among treatments.

Do FAERS signals prove that Lecanemab causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.