← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Lidocaine and 0.5% side effects: what 432 FDA adverse event reports show

Lidocaine, 0.5% · 9 reaction terms · 50 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Amide Local Anesthetic, Antiarrhythmic

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) of the closest related product

Label matched

Lidocaine (Lidocaine)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

432 reports · 71% serious · 30 with death outcome · 54% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Lidocaine Ointment 5% is indicated for production of anesthesia of accessible mucous membranes of the oropharynx. It is also useful as an anesthetic lubricant for intubation and for the temporary relief of pain associated with minor burns, including sunburn, abrasions of the skin, and insect bites.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Lidocaine Ointment 5% contains a local anesthetic agent and is administered topically. See INDICATIONS AND USAGE for specific uses. Lidocaine Ointment 5% contains lidocaine, which .

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 4 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 2
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 5 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Post procedural complication922.7
11.9–43.4ROR 23.2 · χ² 166 / p 3e-38
21.3 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 15.6no trial data cached
Pharmaceutical product complaint1018.4
10.0–34.0ROR 18.8 · χ² 148 / p 2e-34
17.1 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 12.1no trial data cached
Incorrect route of drug administration68.0
3.6–17.8ROR 8.1 · χ² 30 / p 2e-8
5.5 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 32.6no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Pharmaceutical product complaint1018.4
10.0–34.0ROR 18.8 · χ² 148 / p 2e-34
17.1 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 12.1no trial data cached
Post procedural complication922.7
11.9–43.4ROR 23.2 · χ² 166 / p 3e-38
21.3 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 15.6no trial data cached
Incorrect route of drug administration68.0
3.6–17.8ROR 8.1 · χ² 30 / p 2e-8
5.5 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 32.6no trial data cached
Muscle spasticity415.7
5.9–41.5ROR 15.8 · χ² 41 / p 7e-11
9.9 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.6no trial data cached
Eyelid oedema416.6
6.3–44.0ROR 16.7 · χ² 44 / p 2e-11
10.7 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.7no trial data cached
Product adhesion issue34.1
1.3–12.7ROR 4.1 · χ² 4 / p 0.019
2.8 EB05 1.1 · IC025 -0.6
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Application site erythema35.5
1.8–17.1ROR 5.6 · χ² 7 / p 0.004
3.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached
Application site pruritus36.4
2.1–19.8ROR 6.5 · χ² 9 / p 0.001
3.7 EB05 1.4 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Lidocaine and 0.5%?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Lidocaine and 0.5% are pharmaceutical product complaint, drug toxicity, muscle spasticity, eyelid oedema, application site erythema, application site pruritus. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Lidocaine and 0.5% have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Lidocaine and 0.5% has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Lidocaine and 0.5% causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.