← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Loteprednol Etabonate side effects: what 5,307 FDA adverse event reports show

Loteprednol Etabonate · 293 reaction terms · 10,457 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Corticosteroid

FDA label, Indications wording

Who reports

5,307 reports · 34% serious · 134 with death outcome · 75% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel is a corticosteroid indicated for the treatment of post-operative inflammation and pain following ocular surgery. Loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel is a corticosteroid indicated for the treatment of postoperative inflammation and pain following ocular surgery. ( 1 )

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Loteprednol etabonate is a corticosteroid.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 2Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 6Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 27
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 253 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Ocular discomfort14551.3
43.7–60.3ROR 52.7 · χ² 7,013 / p <1e-300
50.3 EB05 43.8 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Eye pain73050.8
47.5–54.4ROR 58.4 · χ² 35,215 / p <1e-300
50.1 EB05 47.1 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 23.2 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Eye irritation62643.1
40.0–46.4ROR 48.5 · χ² 25,463 / p <1e-300
42.5 EB05 39.8 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 36.7 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Intraocular pressure increased (raised eye pressure)13841.2
34.9–48.6ROR 42.2 · χ² 5,319 / p <1e-300
40.6 EB05 35.2 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 52.6no trial data cached
Eye discharge10840.5
33.6–48.9ROR 41.3 · χ² 4,082 / p <1e-300
39.8 EB05 33.9 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Eye inflammation8735.3
28.6–43.5ROR 35.9 · χ² 2,840 / p <1e-300
34.7 EB05 29.0 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=28 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Photophobia (light sensitivity)17034.9
30.0–40.4ROR 35.9 · χ² 5,510 / p <1e-300
34.4 EB05 30.3 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.5 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Ocular hyperaemia36129.5
26.7–32.6ROR 31.5 · χ² 9,869 / p <1e-300
29.3 EB05 26.8 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.2 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Lacrimation increased18824.0
20.9–27.7ROR 24.8 · χ² 4,104 / p <1e-300
23.8 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.7 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Eye pruritus16919.5
16.8–22.7ROR 20.1 · χ² 2,944 / p <1e-300
19.4 EB05 17.1 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.6 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Dry eye23218.2
16.1–20.7ROR 19.0 · χ² 3,756 / p <1e-300
18.1 EB05 16.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 29.0 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Eye swelling17317.8
15.4–20.7ROR 18.4 · χ² 2,724 / p <1e-300
17.7 EB05 15.6 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.4 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Glaucoma6613.0
10.3–16.6ROR 13.2 · χ² 720 / p 8e-159
12.8 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 22.6no trial data cached
Vitreous floaters3011.7
8.2–16.8ROR 11.8 · χ² 283 / p 9e-64
11.1 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Product packaging quantity issue3211.2
7.9–15.8ROR 11.2 · χ² 285 / p 3e-64
10.6 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact79% consumerno trial data cached
Eyelid oedema3210.4
7.4–14.7ROR 10.5 · χ² 262 / p 3e-59
9.8 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.5 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Eye disorder8610.0
8.1–12.3ROR 10.1 · χ² 685 / p 3e-151
9.7 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.0 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Product administration error499.3
7.1–12.3ROR 9.4 · χ² 356 / p 1e-79
8.9 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.2 · 95% consumerno trial data cached
Product use complaint379.1
6.6–12.5ROR 9.1 · χ² 257 / p 3e-58
8.5 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=3 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Conjunctivitis428.7
6.4–11.7ROR 8.7 · χ² 278 / p 1e-62
8.2 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.7no trial data cached
Product prescribing issue458.4
6.3–11.2ROR 8.5 · χ² 286 / p 2e-64
7.9 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.4no trial data cached
Visual acuity reduced738.3
6.6–10.4ROR 8.4 · χ² 460 / p 2e-102
8.0 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.6no trial data cached
Uveitis287.9
5.4–11.4ROR 7.9 · χ² 161 / p 3e-37
7.2 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.0no trial data cached
Eyelid ptosis207.5
4.8–11.6ROR 7.5 · χ² 106 / p 5e-25
6.5 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Product prescribing error457.2
5.4–9.7ROR 7.3 · χ² 235 / p 3e-53
6.8 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.7 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Cataract1117.1
5.9–8.6ROR 7.2 · χ² 577 / p 7e-128
6.9 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 12.2no trial data cached
Ear discomfort197.1
4.5–11.1ROR 7.1 · χ² 93 / p 3e-22
6.2 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=6no trial data cached
Dermatitis contact196.4
4.1–10.0ROR 6.4 · χ² 80 / p 2e-19
5.6 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=9no trial data cached
Visual impairment1875.8
5.0–6.6ROR 5.9 · χ² 737 / p 2e-162
5.7 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Rotator cuff syndrome195.6
3.6–8.8ROR 5.6 · χ² 67 / p 1e-16
5.0 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.3no trial data cached
Blindness unilateral205.4
3.5–8.4ROR 5.4 · χ² 67 / p 1e-16
4.8 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.7no trial data cached
Retinal detachment135.4
3.1–9.2ROR 5.4 · χ² 42 / p 5e-11
4.6 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.5no trial data cached
Economic problem215.2
3.4–7.9ROR 5.2 · χ² 67 / p 2e-16
4.7 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.8no trial data cached
Eye haemorrhage185.1
3.2–8.1ROR 5.1 · χ² 55 / p 5e-14
4.6 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Inability to afford medication135.0
2.9–8.6ROR 5.0 · χ² 38 / p 4e-10
4.3 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4no trial data cached
Skin laceration144.9
2.9–8.3ROR 4.9 · χ² 40 / p 1e-10
4.3 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.6no trial data cached
Intervertebral disc degeneration124.9
2.8–8.6ROR 4.9 · χ² 33 / p 4e-9
4.2 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.0no trial data cached
Seasonal allergy184.8
3.1–7.7ROR 4.9 · χ² 51 / p 4e-13
4.3 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=7no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Eye pain73050.8
47.5–54.4ROR 58.4 · χ² 35,215 / p <1e-300
50.1 EB05 47.1 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 23.2 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Eye irritation62643.1
40.0–46.4ROR 48.5 · χ² 25,463 / p <1e-300
42.5 EB05 39.8 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 36.7 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)4672.0
1.9–2.2ROR 2.1 · χ² 258 / p 2e-58
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Ocular hyperaemia36129.5
26.7–32.6ROR 31.5 · χ² 9,869 / p <1e-300
29.3 EB05 26.8 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.2 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Headache2841.7
1.5–1.9ROR 1.8 · χ² 88 / p 4e-21
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.2 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Dry eye23218.2
16.1–20.7ROR 19.0 · χ² 3,756 / p <1e-300
18.1 EB05 16.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 29.0 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Product dose omission issue2002.7
2.3–3.1ROR 2.7 · χ² 209 / p 1e-47
2.7 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.6 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication1903.0
2.6–3.4ROR 3.0 · χ² 246 / p 1e-55
2.9 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.1 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Lacrimation increased18824.0
20.9–27.7ROR 24.8 · χ² 4,104 / p <1e-300
23.8 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.7 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Visual impairment1875.8
5.0–6.6ROR 5.9 · χ² 737 / p 2e-162
5.7 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Eye swelling17317.8
15.4–20.7ROR 18.4 · χ² 2,724 / p <1e-300
17.7 EB05 15.6 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.4 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Photophobia (light sensitivity)17034.9
30.0–40.4ROR 35.9 · χ² 5,510 / p <1e-300
34.4 EB05 30.3 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.5 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Eye pruritus16919.5
16.8–22.7ROR 20.1 · χ² 2,944 / p <1e-300
19.4 EB05 17.1 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.6 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Condition aggravated1682.1
1.8–2.5ROR 2.1 · χ² 99 / p 2e-23
2.1 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.8Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.2no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Loteprednol Etabonate?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Loteprednol Etabonate are eye pain, eye irritation, vision blurred, ocular hyperaemia, headache, dry eye. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Loteprednol Etabonate have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Loteprednol Etabonate has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Loteprednol Etabonate causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.