← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

In Water For side effects: what 12,699 FDA adverse event reports show

Magnesium Sulfate In Water For · 1,147 reaction terms · 61,426 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

No validated FDA label found

Who reports

12,699 reports · 90% serious · 2,078 with death outcome · 60% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

—

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 5No label text to screen 34
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,107 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Normal labour1075,446.5
3,670.9–8,080.9ROR 5,492.8 · χ² 132,864 / p <1e-300
1,023.0 EB05 870.4 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=107 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Vaginal flatulence1531,672.6
1,335.7–2,094.4ROR 1,693.0 · χ² 125,285 / p <1e-300
747.9 EB05 653.6 · IC025 +7.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=153 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Mitochondrial dna mutation30888.5
569.6–1,385.8ROR 890.6 · χ² 16,638 / p <1e-300
420.4 EB05 308.7 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=30 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Neonatal intestinal perforation12814.4
407.4–1,628.2ROR 815.2 · χ² 5,968 / p <1e-300
291.2 EB05 177.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Vascular resistance systemic increased10397.3
199.1–792.9ROR 397.6 · χ² 2,867 / p <1e-300
198.9 EB05 115.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Csf oligoclonal band present20322.5
199.7–520.9ROR 323.1 · χ² 5,086 / p <1e-300
214.4 EB05 146.6 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=20 · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Delivery108322.2
262.3–395.8ROR 324.9 · χ² 28,604 / p <1e-300
256.9 EB05 218.8 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=107 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Hypermagnesaemia81239.0
189.4–301.6ROR 240.5 · χ² 16,535 / p <1e-300
198.8 EB05 165.1 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=77 · ♀ 89% (drug 60%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Negative pressure pulmonary oedema11221.2
117.9–415.2ROR 221.4 · χ² 1,933 / p <1e-300
146.1 EB05 87.0 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Female genital tract fistula162171.7
146.2–201.7ROR 173.9 · χ² 24,716 / p <1e-300
152.6 EB05 133.9 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=162 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Airway peak pressure increased13154.6
87.5–272.9ROR 154.7 · χ² 1,674 / p <1e-300
117.4 EB05 73.0 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Pco2 increased49121.1
90.7–161.8ROR 121.6 · χ² 5,322 / p <1e-300
108.1 EB05 85.0 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=49 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Neuromuscular blockade15116.3
68.9–196.4ROR 116.5 · χ² 1,495 / p <1e-300
95.8 EB05 61.6 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Radiculopathy164109.5
93.6–128.2ROR 110.9 · χ² 16,425 / p <1e-300
101.5 EB05 89.1 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=164 · ♀ 97% (drug 60%)NCT00170950: 2/5,757 (0.0%) on In Water For (serious AE)
Renal ischaemia32103.4
72.4–147.8ROR 103.7 · χ² 2,956 / p <1e-300
92.1 EB05 68.3 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=32 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Po2 increased30102.9
71.2–148.7ROR 103.1 · χ² 2,752 / p <1e-300
91.3 EB05 67.1 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=30 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Tachycardia foetal2898.9
67.6–144.8ROR 99.1 · χ² 2,467 / p <1e-300
87.9 EB05 63.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=27 · ♀ 0% (drug 60%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Chronic sinusitis20495.1
82.7–109.4ROR 96.6 · χ² 17,861 / p <1e-300
89.2 EB05 79.4 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=205 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)NCT00170950: 1/5,740 (0.0%) on In Water For (serious AE)
Proctitis15294.6
80.4–111.4ROR 95.8 · χ² 13,223 / p <1e-300
88.5 EB05 77.3 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=152 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Propofol infusion syndrome3893.9
67.8–130.2ROR 94.2 · χ² 3,216 / p <1e-300
85.2 EB05 64.8 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=38 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Adrenal suppression4593.0
68.9–125.5ROR 93.3 · χ² 3,789 / p <1e-300
85.0 EB05 66.1 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=45 · ♀ 0% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Blood magnesium increased4688.6
65.9–119.1ROR 88.9 · χ² 3,695 / p <1e-300
81.3 EB05 63.4 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=28 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 100% clinicianNCT03914326: 1/4,825 (0.0%) on In Water For (serious AE)
Blood gases abnormal2684.4
56.9–125.1ROR 84.5 · χ² 1,958 / p <1e-300
75.9 EB05 54.5 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=26 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Apgar score low5674.7
57.2–97.6ROR 75.0 · χ² 3,824 / p <1e-300
69.8 EB05 55.8 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=54 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Neuromuscular block prolonged1569.4
41.4–116.3ROR 69.5 · χ² 906 / p 3e-199
61.6 EB05 39.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Status asthmaticus1968.3
43.2–108.1ROR 68.4 · χ² 1,146 / p 2e-251
61.7 EB05 41.8 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=19not reported in cached trials
Macular degeneration46366.8
60.9–73.1ROR 69.2 · χ² 28,760 / p <1e-300
64.0 EB05 59.3 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 43.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)NCT03914326: 1/4,825 (0.0%) on In Water For (serious AE)
Respiratory tract infection bacterial1965.2
41.2–103.0ROR 65.3 · χ² 1,093 / p 5e-240
59.2 EB05 40.0 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=19NCT03914326: 1/4,825 (0.0%) control (serious AE)
Hellp syndrome2363.8
42.1–96.8ROR 63.9 · χ² 1,309 / p 7e-287
58.6 EB05 41.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=23 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pleocytosis2059.0
37.8–92.2ROR 59.1 · χ² 1,046 / p 1e-229
54.2 EB05 37.1 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=20not reported in cached trials
Bradycardia foetal2756.3
38.4–82.6ROR 56.4 · χ² 1,365 / p 4e-299
52.6 EB05 37.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=27 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Intraventricular haemorrhage neonatal1655.9
34.0–92.0ROR 56.0 · χ² 782 / p 2e-172
51.0 EB05 33.3 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Diabetes insipidus7955.7
44.5–69.6ROR 56.0 · χ² 4,050 / p <1e-300
53.2 EB05 44.1 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=79not reported in cached trials
Blood ph decreased5655.6
42.6–72.5ROR 55.8 · χ² 2,849 / p <1e-300
52.8 EB05 42.2 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=56 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Neonatal infection1154.1
29.7–98.7ROR 54.2 · χ² 505 / p 4e-112
48.3 EB05 28.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Low birth weight baby24953.4
47.1–60.5ROR 54.4 · χ² 12,351 / p <1e-300
51.5 EB05 46.4 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 33.2 · 98% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Maternal exposure during delivery3052.6
36.6–75.6ROR 52.7 · χ² 1,422 / p <1e-300
49.5 EB05 36.3 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=25 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Eclampsia1151.5
28.3–93.8ROR 51.5 · χ² 480 / p 1e-106
46.2 EB05 27.5 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Postpartum haemorrhage3849.2
35.7–68.0ROR 49.4 · χ² 1,697 / p <1e-300
46.8 EB05 35.6 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=38 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Foetal heart rate deceleration abnormality2048.3
31.0–75.4ROR 48.4 · χ² 855 / p 3e-188
45.1 EB05 30.8 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=20not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list In Water For as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (5 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,1941.5
1.4–1.6ROR 1.5 · χ² 210 / p 6e-48
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.5not reported in cached trials
Nausea8351.7
1.6–1.9ROR 1.8 · χ² 277 / p 2e-62
1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7No label text to screenserious PRR 2.0NCT00170950: 9/5,740 (0.2%) on In Water For (serious AE)
Off label use (used outside approved label)8291.6
1.5–1.7ROR 1.6 · χ² 182 / p 7e-42
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.7not reported in cached trials
Pyrexia (fever)7873.8
3.5–4.0ROR 3.9 · χ² 1,615 / p <1e-300
3.7 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 2.9NCT00170950: 7/5,740 (0.1%) on In Water For (serious AE)
Maternal exposure during pregnancy74914.1
13.2–15.2ROR 15.0 · χ² 9,091 / p <1e-300
14.0 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 10.5 · ♀ 97% (drug 60%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pain7001.9
1.7–2.0ROR 1.9 · χ² 296 / p 1e-66
1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8No label text to screenserious PRR 1.8NCT00170950: 21/5,740 (0.4%) on In Water For (serious AE)
Foetal exposure during pregnancy68114.0
13.0–15.0ROR 14.7 · χ² 8,138 / p <1e-300
13.8 EB05 13.0 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.9 · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Premature baby67237.6
34.9–40.5ROR 39.6 · χ² 23,388 / p <1e-300
36.7 EB05 34.5 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 23.5 · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)6381.6
1.5–1.8ROR 1.7 · χ² 163 / p 1e-37
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6No label text to screenserious PRR 1.7NCT00170950: 17/5,740 (0.3%) on In Water For (serious AE)
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)5931.7
1.6–1.9ROR 1.8 · χ² 188 / p 5e-43
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7No label text to screenserious PRR 1.4NCT00170950: 40/5,740 (0.7%) on In Water For (serious AE)
Anaemia (low red blood cells)5574.8
4.5–5.2ROR 5.0 · χ² 1,699 / p <1e-300
4.8 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 3.4NCT00170950: 34/5,740 (0.6%) on In Water For (serious AE)
Hypotension (low blood pressure)5564.6
4.2–5.0ROR 4.8 · χ² 1,571 / p <1e-300
4.6 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 3.3NCT00170950: 1/5,757 (0.0%) on In Water For (serious AE)
Vomiting5221.8
1.7–2.0ROR 1.9 · χ² 204 / p 2e-46
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7No label text to screenserious PRR 1.7NCT00170950: 13/5,740 (0.2%) on In Water For (serious AE)
Pneumonia (lung infection)4802.5
2.2–2.7ROR 2.5 · χ² 418 / p 3e-93
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 1.6NCT00170950: 1/5,740 (0.0%) on In Water For (serious AE)
Abdominal pain4653.3
3.0–3.6ROR 3.4 · χ² 753 / p 4e-166
3.3 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 2.7NCT00170950: 21/5,740 (0.4%) on In Water For (serious AE)

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of In Water For?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for In Water For are nausea, pyrexia, pain, premature baby, diarrhoea, dyspnoea. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does In Water For have an FDA boxed warning?

No validated FDA label could be retrieved for this product name, so this page cannot say.

Do FAERS signals prove that In Water For causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.