← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Melphalan Hydrochloride side effects: what 24,926 FDA adverse event reports show

Melphalan Hydrochloride · 1,128 reaction terms · 85,808 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Melphalan Hydrochloride (Melphalan Hydrochloride)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

24,926 reports · 97% serious · 5,941 with death outcome · 43% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Melphalan Hydrochloride for Injection is indicated for the palliative treatment of patients with multiple myeloma for whom oral therapy is not appropriate.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Melphalan, also known as L-phenylalanine mustard, phenylalanine mustard, L-PAM, or L-sarcolysin, is a phenylalanine derivative of nitrogen mustard. Melphalan is a bifunctional alkylating agent that is active against selected human neoplastic diseases.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

Melphalan should be administered under the supervision of a qualified physician experienced in the use of cancer chemotherapeutic agents. Severe bone marrow suppression with resulting infection or bleeding may occur. Controlled trials comparing intravenous (IV) to oral melphalan have shown more myelosuppression with the IV formulation.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Not in label — unassessed 40
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,088 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Choroidal dystrophy291,265.6
709.7–2,256.7ROR 1,267.0 · calibrated p 4e-16 ✓
376.6 EB05 275.0 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=29 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Meningomyelitis herpes15731.6
365.4–1,464.8ROR 732.1 · calibrated p 5e-13 ✓
260.3 EB05 167.4 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Protothecosis37547.8
361.7–829.7ROR 548.7 · calibrated p 2e-13 ✓
282.1 EB05 213.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=37 · ♀ 100% (drug 43%)no trial data cached
Chorioretinal atrophy67394.0
294.6–526.9ROR 395.1 · calibrated p 2e-12 ✓
248.5 EB05 202.4 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=67 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia27298.5
192.3–463.3ROR 298.8 · calibrated p 8e-11 ✓
190.3 EB05 137.4 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27no trial data cached
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary gland15296.1
164.2–533.9ROR 296.3 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓
171.2 EB05 110.2 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Engraftment syndrome139261.3
216.1–316.1ROR 262.8 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓
193.7 EB05 168.1 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=136 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Choroidal infarction28255.1
167.1–389.6ROR 255.4 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓
172.5 EB05 125.3 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Retinoblastoma25249.7
159.7–390.5ROR 250.0 · calibrated p 4e-10 ✓
167.8 EB05 119.5 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Pre-engraftment immune reaction18244.7
144.7–413.9ROR 244.8 · calibrated p 9e-10 ✓
157.8 EB05 105.6 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial data cached
Engraft failure58214.7
160.9–286.5ROR 215.2 · calibrated p 5e-10 ✓
161.7 EB05 129.7 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=58 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Clonal haematopoiesis15214.4
121.6–378.3ROR 214.6 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓
140.5 EB05 90.4 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Iris atrophy42213.6
152.2–299.8ROR 214.0 · calibrated p 6e-10 ✓
158.0 EB05 121.8 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42 · ♀ 66% (drug 43%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Malignant transformation85196.9
155.5–249.3ROR 197.5 · calibrated p 7e-10 ✓
153.8 EB05 128.3 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=85 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Neuroblastoma recurrent36183.1
127.7–262.7ROR 183.4 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓
139.2 EB05 105.1 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Blood stem cell transplant failure37174.3
122.3–248.4ROR 174.6 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓
134.3 EB05 101.8 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=37 · ♀ 21% (drug 43%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome51174.0
128.7–235.3ROR 174.4 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓
136.7 EB05 108.0 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=51 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Delayed engraftment22172.1
108.7–272.3ROR 172.2 · calibrated p 8e-9 ✓
127.2 EB05 88.5 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts19162.4
99.3–265.5ROR 162.5 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
119.9 EB05 81.1 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial data cached
Poems syndrome17162.0
96.4–272.4ROR 162.1 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
118.0 EB05 78.1 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
Pneumonia adenoviral30156.4
105.9–231.1ROR 156.6 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
121.7 EB05 89.4 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Adenovirus reactivation21150.1
94.3–238.9ROR 150.2 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
114.3 EB05 78.9 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Adenoviral hepatitis35149.6
104.4–214.4ROR 149.8 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
118.8 EB05 89.3 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35 · ♀ 69% (drug 43%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Acute graft versus host disease in intestine199139.1
119.8–161.6ROR 140.2 · calibrated p 9e-9 ✓
118.0 EB05 104.8 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=199 · 99% clinicianno trial data cached
Gastroenteritis adenovirus22137.2
87.4–215.3ROR 137.3 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
107.1 EB05 74.6 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22no trial data cached
Chronic graft versus host disease in intestine26136.4
90.1–206.6ROR 136.6 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
108.2 EB05 77.6 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Retinal depigmentation40126.6
90.8–176.5ROR 126.8 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
104.6 EB05 80.1 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Light chain disease19125.0
77.2–202.5ROR 125.1 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
98.3 EB05 66.5 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial data cached
Acute graft versus host disease575119.7
109.8–130.5ROR 122.5 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
104.4 EB05 97.4 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=571 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Acute graft versus host disease in skin341118.7
106.0–132.8ROR 120.3 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
103.3 EB05 94.5 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=341 · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Adenovirus infection351117.4
105.0–131.1ROR 119.0 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
102.4 EB05 93.7 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=350 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Iris neovascularisation15115.2
67.1–197.6ROR 115.2 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
90.0 EB05 57.9 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Human herpesvirus 6 encephalitis33110.3
76.7–158.6ROR 110.5 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
92.4 EB05 68.9 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Graft versus host disease in intestine15108.2
63.2–185.2ROR 108.2 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
85.7 EB05 55.1 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Venoocclusive liver disease544104.7
95.8–114.3ROR 107.0 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓
92.7 EB05 86.4 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=544 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Retinal pigment epitheliopathy48104.2
77.2–140.6ROR 104.4 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
89.5 EB05 70.2 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=48 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Atrophy of globe14103.6
59.5–180.6ROR 103.7 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓
82.2 EB05 52.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Acute graft versus host disease in liver79103.5
81.9–130.7ROR 103.8 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
90.2 EB05 74.7 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=79 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Adenoviral haemorrhagic cystitis23103.1
66.8–159.0ROR 103.2 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
85.5 EB05 60.0 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Human herpesvirus 6 infection reactivation3697.2
68.9–137.3ROR 97.4 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
83.4 EB05 62.9 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)2,4942.4
2.3–2.5ROR 2.6 · calibrated p 0.780
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.6 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,4730.9
0.9–1.0ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.267
0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.6 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Febrile neutropenia1,31717.1
16.2–18.0ROR 17.9 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
16.7 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.9 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Plasma cell myeloma1,27428.3
26.8–29.9ROR 29.8 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
27.4 EB05 26.2 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 17.2 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))1,2347.7
7.3–8.2ROR 8.1 · calibrated p 0.065
7.6 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.7 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Mucosal inflammation1,22941.6
39.3–44.0ROR 43.7 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
39.6 EB05 37.8 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.7 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Pyrexia (fever)1,1752.9
2.7–3.0ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.642
2.9 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.1 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Pneumonia (lung infection)1,1523.0
2.8–3.2ROR 3.1 · calibrated p 0.594
3.0 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 1.8 · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)1,1438.7
8.2–9.2ROR 9.1 · calibrated p 0.045 ✓
8.6 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 5.2 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)1,0441.4
1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.564
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.4 · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication9593.3
3.1–3.5ROR 3.4 · calibrated p 0.509
3.3 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.1 · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Sepsis (blood infection)9006.8
6.4–7.3ROR 7.1 · calibrated p 0.097
6.8 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.0 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Disease progression8225.9
5.5–6.3ROR 6.1 · calibrated p 0.146
5.8 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.9 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Infection7644.5
4.2–4.8ROR 4.6 · calibrated p 0.285
4.4 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 3.3 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Anaemia (low red blood cells)7503.3
3.1–3.6ROR 3.4 · calibrated p 0.514
3.3 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.1no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Oxycodone Hydrochloride ↔ Drug Dependence.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Melphalan?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Melphalan are febrile neutropenia, plasma cell myeloma, neutropenia, mucosal inflammation, pyrexia, pneumonia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Melphalan have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: Melphalan should be administered under the supervision of a qualified physician experienced in the use of cancer chemotherapeutic agents. Severe bone marrow suppression with resulting infection or bleeding may occur. Controlled trials comparing intravenous (IV) to oral melphalan have shown more myelosuppression with the IV formulation.

Do FAERS signals prove that Melphalan causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.