← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Micafungin Sodium side effects: what 6,382 FDA adverse event reports show

Micafungin Sodium · 1,010 reaction terms · 30,978 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Echinocandin Antifungal

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

6,382 reports · 96% serious · 2,365 with death outcome · 40% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Micafungin for injection is indicated for: • Treatment of Candidemia, Acute Disseminated Candidiasis, Candida Peritonitis and Abscesses in adult and pediatric patients 4 months of age and older [see Clinical Studies ( 14.1 ) and Use in Specific Populat.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Micafungin for Injection, USP is a sterile, lyophilized product for intravenous (IV) infusion that contains micafungin sodium. Micafungin sodium is a semisynthetic lipopeptide (echinocandin) synthesized by a chemical modification of a fermentation product of Coleophoma empetri F-11899.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 4Lab value / disease marker 4Not in label — unassessed 31
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 970 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Anti factor v antibody144,294.4
1,802.0–10,234.1ROR 4,301.5 · χ² 20,318 / p <1e-300
496.7 EB05 314.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=13no trial data cached
Lymphoid tissue hypoplasia843,271.9
2,361.8–4,532.8ROR 3,304.8 · χ² 116,320 / p <1e-300
1,060.8 EB05 883.6 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=7no trial data cached
Pre-engraftment immune reaction443,085.0
1,980.1–4,806.4ROR 3,101.1 · χ² 58,739 / p <1e-300
854.8 EB05 663.1 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=44 · ♀ 71% (drug 40%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Thymus hypoplasia822,286.6
1,693.8–3,086.9ROR 2,309.1 · χ² 95,796 / p <1e-300
926.1 EB05 769.7 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=7no trial data cached
Disseminated aspergillosis96641.9
513.3–802.8ROR 649.3 · χ² 48,188 / p <1e-300
461.9 EB05 389.4 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Corynebacterium bacteraemia17641.8
376.4–1,094.2ROR 643.1 · χ² 8,121 / p <1e-300
323.5 EB05 213.9 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
Herpes simplex oesophagitis28455.0
304.2–680.7ROR 456.5 · χ² 10,321 / p <1e-300
304.2 EB05 220.9 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
–no trial data cached
Geotrichum infection30409.0
278.0–601.6ROR 410.4 · χ² 10,119 / p <1e-300
286.6 EB05 210.5 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30no trial data cached
Cerebral ventricle collapse10377.5
194.1–734.4ROR 378.0 · χ² 2,936 / p <1e-300
201.8 EB05 117.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Mycotic endophthalmitis21312.3
198.4–491.6ROR 313.1 · χ² 5,508 / p <1e-300
221.5 EB05 152.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21no trial data cached
Gastrointestinal mucormycosis17298.0
180.2–492.7ROR 298.6 · χ² 4,226 / p <1e-300
204.9 EB05 135.5 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
Trichosporon infection39271.9
195.4–378.2ROR 273.1 · χ² 9,234 / p <1e-300
218.7 EB05 166.9 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Pulmonary mucormycosis44232.2
170.6–316.1ROR 233.4 · χ² 9,044 / p <1e-300
194.4 EB05 150.8 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=44 · ♀ 69% (drug 40%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Disseminated mucormycosis32223.7
155.9–321.1ROR 224.6 · χ² 6,300 / p <1e-300
182.9 EB05 135.6 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · ♀ 10% (drug 40%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Engraft failure20187.3
118.9–295.0ROR 187.8 · χ² 3,273 / p <1e-300
149.5 EB05 102.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · ♀ 65% (drug 40%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Fungal endocarditis20181.8
115.5–286.1ROR 182.2 · χ² 3,181 / p <1e-300
146.0 EB05 99.8 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=17no trial data cached
Cerebral aspergillosis40173.4
125.9–238.8ROR 174.2 · χ² 6,245 / p <1e-300
150.5 EB05 115.3 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=40no trial data cached
Blood beta-d-glucan increased20173.4
110.2–272.8ROR 173.8 · χ² 3,043 / p <1e-300
140.6 EB05 96.1 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=17no trial data cached
Cystitis viral22152.5
99.2–234.5ROR 152.9 · χ² 2,976 / p <1e-300
127.9 EB05 89.1 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Fungaemia82137.6
110.3–171.7ROR 139.0 · χ² 10,404 / p <1e-300
126.6 EB05 105.2 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=76 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome15131.9
78.5–221.7ROR 132.2 · χ² 1,727 / p <1e-300
108.4 EB05 69.7 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Fusarium infection34130.2
92.3–183.7ROR 130.7 · χ² 4,017 / p <1e-300
115.8 EB05 86.6 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33 · ♀ 19% (drug 40%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Rhinocerebral mucormycosis17130.0
79.8–211.6ROR 130.2 · χ² 1,945 / p <1e-300
108.7 EB05 71.9 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
Scedosporium infection34128.4
91.0–181.1ROR 128.9 · χ² 3,963 / p <1e-300
114.3 EB05 85.6 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34no trial data cached
Nasal abscess11126.1
68.8–231.1ROR 126.3 · χ² 1,183 / p 2e-259
99.8 EB05 59.4 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=11no trial data cached
Systemic mycosis56125.4
95.9–163.9ROR 126.2 · χ² 6,457 / p <1e-300
114.8 EB05 91.7 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=52no trial data cached
Aspergillus test positive14118.5
69.3–202.5ROR 118.7 · χ² 1,445 / p <1e-300
98.3 EB05 62.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=14no trial data cached
Encephalitis viral55118.4
90.4–155.0ROR 119.2 · χ² 5,996 / p <1e-300
108.8 EB05 86.7 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=55 · ♀ 67% (drug 40%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Enterococcus test positive29115.7
79.8–167.8ROR 116.1 · χ² 3,041 / p <1e-300
103.2 EB05 75.4 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=12no trial data cached
Aplastic anaemia228113.1
99.2–128.9ROR 116.2 · χ² 24,115 / p <1e-300
107.2 EB05 96.0 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Periostitis19112.9
71.3–178.7ROR 113.1 · χ² 1,909 / p <1e-300
97.6 EB05 66.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial data cached
Adenoviral hepatitis10112.1
59.5–211.1ROR 112.2 · χ² 949 / p 1e-208
89.4 EB05 51.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Human herpesvirus 6 encephalitis12109.5
61.4–195.1ROR 109.6 · χ² 1,133 / p 1e-248
90.2 EB05 55.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Enterococcal sepsis34108.1
76.7–152.3ROR 108.5 · χ² 3,353 / p <1e-300
98.0 EB05 73.3 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · ♀ 62% (drug 40%)no trial data cached
Acute graft versus host disease in intestine5499.6
75.9–130.6ROR 100.2 · χ² 4,969 / p <1e-300
92.7 EB05 73.7 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=54 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Mucormycosis9999.5
81.5–121.5ROR 100.7 · χ² 9,183 / p <1e-300
94.0 EB05 79.4 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=96 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Acute graft versus host disease in liver2796.7
65.9–142.0ROR 97.0 · χ² 2,370 / p <1e-300
87.5 EB05 63.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · ♀ 17% (drug 40%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Systemic candida9195.2
77.3–117.3ROR 96.3 · χ² 8,078 / p <1e-300
90.0 EB05 75.5 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=81no trial data cached
Acute graft versus host disease in skin9891.6
74.9–111.9ROR 92.6 · χ² 8,378 / p <1e-300
86.9 EB05 73.4 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=98 · 99% clinicianno trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,2223.5
3.3–3.7ROR 3.9 · χ² 2,278 / p <1e-300
3.5 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.6no trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,1392.2
2.0–2.3ROR 2.3 · χ² 749 / p 4e-165
2.2 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.5no trial data cached
Febrile neutropenia55220.9
19.3–22.7ROR 22.3 · χ² 10,386 / p <1e-300
20.7 EB05 19.3 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 12.7 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Pyrexia (fever)5353.8
3.5–4.2ROR 4.0 · χ² 1,142 / p 1e-250
3.8 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.3no trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication3984.1
3.7–4.5ROR 4.2 · χ² 923 / p 4e-203
4.0 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.4 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Sepsis (blood infection)3618.1
7.3–8.9ROR 8.4 · χ² 2,234 / p <1e-300
8.0 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.4no trial data cached
Death3170.9
0.8–1.0ROR 0.9 · χ² 2 / p 0.058
0.9 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 0.4no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)3031.2
1.0–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 8 / p 0.003
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.0Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.4no trial data cached
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))2875.3
4.7–5.9ROR 5.4 · χ² 995 / p 9e-219
5.2 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.8no trial data cached
Respiratory failure2639.0
8.0–10.1ROR 9.3 · χ² 1,860 / p <1e-300
8.9 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Septic shock24614.2
12.6–16.1ROR 14.6 · χ² 3,003 / p <1e-300
14.1 EB05 12.7 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.8no trial data cached
Aplastic anaemia228113.1
99.2–128.9ROR 116.2 · χ² 24,115 / p <1e-300
107.2 EB05 96.0 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Micafungin?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Micafungin are febrile neutropenia, pyrexia, sepsis, pneumonia, diarrhoea, neutropenia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Micafungin have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Micafungin has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Micafungin causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.