Monomethyl side effects: what 926 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Not stated in label
Label matched
Monomethyl Fumarate (Bafiertam)
Who reports
926 reports · 13% serious · 3 with death outcome · 85% female
Used for
BAFIERTAM is indicated for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), to include clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting disease, and active secondary progressive disease, in adults. BAFIERTAM is indicated for the treatment .
What it is
BAFIERTAM contains the active ingredient monomethyl fumarate, which is an unsaturated monomethyl ester. It is also known by its chemical name, fumaric acid monomethyl ester, (C 5 H 6 O 4 ). It.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 9 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 0 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flushing | 348 | 77.4 71.2–84.2ROR 123.4 · χ² 26,215 / p <1e-300 | 76.9 EB05 70.3 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 47.2 · 92% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Insurance issue | 11 | 16.8 9.3–30.2ROR 17.0 · χ² 148 / p 3e-34 | 15.5 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 14.0 | no trial data cached |
| Feeling hot | 41 | 15.1 11.2–20.4ROR 15.8 · χ² 528 / p 3e-117 | 14.9 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 3.5 · 95% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Muscle spasticity | 8 | 14.6 7.3–29.1ROR 14.7 · χ² 88 / p 3e-21 | 12.2 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | – | no trial data cached |
| Multiple sclerosis relapse | 40 | 13.1 9.7–17.8ROR 13.7 · χ² 437 / p 3e-97 | 12.8 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious PRR 32.4 · 98% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Burning sensation | 34 | 11.0 7.9–15.3ROR 11.4 · χ² 300 / p 2e-67 | 10.5 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 6.3 · 94% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Hot flush (hot flashes) | 31 | 9.3 6.6–13.2ROR 9.6 · χ² 223 / p 1e-50 | 8.6 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 10.2 · 90% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Skin burning sensation | 18 | 5.7 3.6–9.1ROR 5.8 · χ² 66 / p 2e-16 | 5.0 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 10.9 | no trial data cached |
| Multiple sclerosis | 11 | 5.2 2.9–9.3ROR 5.2 · χ² 33 / p 4e-9 | 4.3 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious PRR 21.9 | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flushing | 348 | 77.4 71.2–84.2ROR 123.4 · χ² 26,215 / p <1e-300 | 76.9 EB05 70.3 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 47.2 · 92% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Feeling hot | 41 | 15.1 11.2–20.4ROR 15.8 · χ² 528 / p 3e-117 | 14.9 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 3.5 · 95% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Multiple sclerosis relapse | 40 | 13.1 9.7–17.8ROR 13.7 · χ² 437 / p 3e-97 | 12.8 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious PRR 32.4 · 98% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Burning sensation | 34 | 11.0 7.9–15.3ROR 11.4 · χ² 300 / p 2e-67 | 10.5 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 6.3 · 94% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Hot flush (hot flashes) | 31 | 9.3 6.6–13.2ROR 9.6 · χ² 223 / p 1e-50 | 8.6 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 10.2 · 90% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Skin burning sensation | 18 | 5.7 3.6–9.1ROR 5.8 · χ² 66 / p 2e-16 | 5.0 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 10.9 | no trial data cached |
| Multiple sclerosis | 11 | 5.2 2.9–9.3ROR 5.2 · χ² 33 / p 4e-9 | 4.3 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious PRR 21.9 | no trial data cached |
| Insurance issue | 11 | 16.8 9.3–30.2ROR 17.0 · χ² 148 / p 3e-34 | 15.5 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 14.0 | no trial data cached |
| Muscle spasticity | 8 | 14.6 7.3–29.1ROR 14.7 · χ² 88 / p 3e-21 | 12.2 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | – | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Feeling hot — n=41, PRR 15.1
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate ↔ Bone loss.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Monomethyl?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Monomethyl are flushing, feeling hot, multiple sclerosis relapse, burning sensation, hot flush, skin burning sensation. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Monomethyl have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Monomethyl has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Monomethyl causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID a161f9d4-70f1-4097-957a-eafb35d3274f, effective 20260716; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"MONOMETHYL FUMARATE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 9 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.