← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Naftifine side effects: what 334 FDA adverse event reports show

Naftifine Hydrochloride · 5 reaction terms · 66 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Allylamine antifungal

FDA label, Indications wording of the closest related product

Label matched

Naftifine Hydrochloride (Naftifine Hydrochloride)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

334 reports · 48% serious · 12 with death outcome · 50% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Naftifine Hydrochloride Cream is indicated for the treatment of interdigital tinea pedis, tinea cruris, and tinea corporis caused by the organism Trichophyton rubrum . Naftifine Hydrochloride Cream is an allylamine antifungal indicated for the treatment of interdigital tinea pedis, tinea cruris, and tinea corporis caused by the organism Trichophyton rubrum .

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Naftifine Hydrochloride Cream is a white to off-white cream for topical use only. Each gram of Naftifine Hydrochloride Cream contains 20 mg of naftifine hydrochloride (2%), a synthetic allylamine antifungal compound.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 3 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Not in label — unassessed 2
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 2 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Blister2730.3
21.1–43.5ROR 32.8 · χ² 737 / p 2e-162
29.7 EB05 21.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 13.3no trial data cached
Skin exfoliation2619.6
13.6–28.4ROR 21.2 · χ² 443 / p 1e-98
19.4 EB05 13.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.1no trial data cached
Application site pain617.1
7.7–37.8ROR 17.4 · χ² 76 / p 2e-18
13.7 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Blister2730.3
21.1–43.5ROR 32.8 · χ² 737 / p 2e-162
29.7 EB05 21.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 13.3no trial data cached
Skin exfoliation2619.6
13.6–28.4ROR 21.2 · χ² 443 / p 1e-98
19.4 EB05 13.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.1no trial data cached
Application site pain617.1
7.7–37.8ROR 17.4 · χ² 76 / p 2e-18
13.7 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached
Application site erythema49.5
3.6–25.3ROR 9.6 · χ² 23 / p 1e-6
5.6 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Libido decreased (lower sex drive)315.2
4.9–46.9ROR 15.3 · χ² 27 / p 1e-7
7.9 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.7no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Naftifine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Naftifine are blister, skin exfoliation, application site pain, application site erythema, libido decreased. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Naftifine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Naftifine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Naftifine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.