← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Neostigmine Methylsulfate side effects: what 426 FDA adverse event reports show

Neostigmine Methylsulfate · 12 reaction terms · 108 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

426 reports · 87% serious · 53 with death outcome · 57% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Neostigmine Methylsulfate Injection, a cholinesterase inhibitor, is indicated for reversal of the effects of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) after surgery. Neostigmine Methylsulfate, a cholinesterase inhibitor, is indicated for reversal of the effects of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) after surgery ( 1 ).

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Neostigmine Methylsulfate Injection, USP, a cholinesterase inhibitor, has an empirical formula of C 13 H 22 N 2 O 6 S, a molecular weight of 334.39 g/mol and the following structural formula: .

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 11 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 9
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Ileus1352.1
30.5–88.9ROR 53.7 · χ² 601 / p 6e-133
48.5 EB05 30.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 34.5no trial data cached
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure1545.2
27.5–74.3ROR 46.8 · χ² 604 / p 1e-133
42.8 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 30.1no trial data cached
Bladder disorder944.6
23.3–85.1ROR 45.5 · χ² 341 / p 2e-76
40.9 EB05 23.0 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=9no trial data cached
Sinus tachycardia1138.2
21.3–68.5ROR 39.2 · χ² 362 / p 4e-81
36.0 EB05 21.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 25.7no trial data cached
Paralysis1034.3
18.6–63.3ROR 35.1 · χ² 291 / p 2e-65
32.3 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.4no trial data cached
Blood test abnormal931.6
16.5–60.3ROR 32.2 · χ² 237 / p 1e-53
29.7 EB05 16.5 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 31.8no trial data cached
Abortion induced631.3
14.2–69.4ROR 31.8 · χ² 147 / p 4e-34
28.1 EB05 12.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 21.6no trial data cached
Neutrophil count increased628.7
13.0–63.6ROR 29.1 · χ² 134 / p 3e-31
25.7 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 20.8no trial data cached
Dementia1323.0
13.5–39.3ROR 23.7 · χ² 252 / p 5e-57
22.2 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.3no trial data cached
Dystonia717.7
8.5–36.9ROR 18.0 · χ² 94 / p 1e-22
15.1 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.9no trial data cached
Circumstance or information capable of leading to medication error68.8
4.0–19.5ROR 8.9 · χ² 34 / p 3e-9
6.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure1545.2
27.5–74.3ROR 46.8 · χ² 604 / p 1e-133
42.8 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 30.1no trial data cached
Dementia1323.0
13.5–39.3ROR 23.7 · χ² 252 / p 5e-57
22.2 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.3no trial data cached
Ileus1352.1
30.5–88.9ROR 53.7 · χ² 601 / p 6e-133
48.5 EB05 30.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 34.5no trial data cached
Sinus tachycardia1138.2
21.3–68.5ROR 39.2 · χ² 362 / p 4e-81
36.0 EB05 21.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 25.7no trial data cached
Paralysis1034.3
18.6–63.3ROR 35.1 · χ² 291 / p 2e-65
32.3 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.4no trial data cached
Blood test abnormal931.6
16.5–60.3ROR 32.2 · χ² 237 / p 1e-53
29.7 EB05 16.5 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 31.8no trial data cached
Bladder disorder944.6
23.3–85.1ROR 45.5 · χ² 341 / p 2e-76
40.9 EB05 23.0 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=9no trial data cached
Dystonia717.7
8.5–36.9ROR 18.0 · χ² 94 / p 1e-22
15.1 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.9no trial data cached
Circumstance or information capable of leading to medication error68.8
4.0–19.5ROR 8.9 · χ² 34 / p 3e-9
6.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Neutrophil count increased628.7
13.0–63.6ROR 29.1 · χ² 134 / p 3e-31
25.7 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 20.8no trial data cached
Abortion induced631.3
14.2–69.4ROR 31.8 · χ² 147 / p 4e-34
28.1 EB05 12.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 21.6no trial data cached
Respiratory depression312.0
3.9–37.2ROR 12.1 · χ² 20 / p 3e-6
6.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.2Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.2no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Neostigmine Methylsulfate?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Neostigmine Methylsulfate are generalised tonic-clonic seizure, dementia, ileus, sinus tachycardia, paralysis, bladder disorder. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Neostigmine Methylsulfate have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Neostigmine Methylsulfate has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Neostigmine Methylsulfate causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.