Netarsudil side effects: what 1,939 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Rho kinase inhibitor
Brand names
Rhopressa
Who reports
1,939 reports · 22% serious · 60 with death outcome · 62% female
Used for
RHOPRESSA is indicated for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. RHOPRESSA ® is a Rho kinase inhibitor indicated for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. ( 1 )
What it is
Netarsudil is a Rho kinase inhibitor.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 24 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 14 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intraocular pressure increased (raised eye pressure) | 93 | 78.9 64.6–96.2ROR 82.8 · χ² 7,023 / p <1e-300 | 77.1 EB05 64.8 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious PRR 68.6 | no trial data cached |
| Ocular hyperaemia | 159 | 36.9 31.8–42.8ROR 40.1 · χ² 5,512 / p <1e-300 | 36.6 EB05 32.1 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 49.9 | no trial data cached |
| Lacrimation increased | 94 | 34.1 28.0–41.6ROR 35.8 · χ² 2,983 / p <1e-300 | 33.8 EB05 28.4 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 24.7 · 85% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Visual acuity reduced | 89 | 28.8 23.5–35.3ROR 30.1 · χ² 2,358 / p <1e-300 | 28.6 EB05 23.9 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 8.0 | no trial data cached |
| Eye pain | 141 | 27.7 23.6–32.4ROR 29.8 · χ² 3,597 / p <1e-300 | 27.5 EB05 23.9 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 20.2 · 87% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye pruritus | 70 | 23.0 18.3–28.9ROR 23.8 · χ² 1,450 / p <1e-300 | 22.8 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 25.5 · 78% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye irritation | 116 | 22.5 18.9–26.9ROR 23.9 · χ² 2,367 / p <1e-300 | 22.4 EB05 19.2 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 40.6 · 79% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye discharge | 21 | 22.3 14.5–34.1ROR 22.5 · χ² 405 / p 3e-90 | 21.8 EB05 15.0 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=4 · 71% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Ocular discomfort | 20 | 19.9 12.9–30.8ROR 20.1 · χ² 341 / p 2e-76 | 19.5 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=4 · 75% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Product packaging quantity issue | 20 | 19.8 12.8–30.7ROR 20.0 · χ² 339 / p 6e-76 | 19.4 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=1 · 90% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Photophobia (light sensitivity) | 28 | 16.2 11.2–23.5ROR 16.5 · χ² 385 / p 5e-86 | 15.9 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 17.2 · 79% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Uveitis | 20 | 16.0 10.4–24.8ROR 16.2 · χ² 267 / p 3e-60 | 15.5 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 11.2 · 75% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye inflammation | 13 | 14.9 8.7–25.6ROR 15.0 · χ² 155 / p 7e-36 | 13.8 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=5 | no trial data cached |
| Vision blurred (blurred vision) | 162 | 12.8 11.1–14.9ROR 13.9 · χ² 1,765 / p <1e-300 | 12.8 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 10.3 · 81% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Glaucoma | 20 | 11.2 7.3–17.4ROR 11.3 · χ² 176 / p 2e-40 | 10.3 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious PRR 28.5 | no trial data cached |
| Dry eye | 43 | 9.6 7.1–12.9ROR 9.8 · χ² 323 / p 1e-72 | 9.1 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.6 · 86% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye haemorrhage | 11 | 8.9 4.9–16.0ROR 8.9 · χ² 69 / p 4e-17 | 7.1 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 11.9 | no trial data cached |
| Conjunctivitis | 15 | 8.8 5.3–14.6ROR 8.9 · χ² 96 / p 5e-23 | 7.5 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +1.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 2.9 | no trial data cached |
| Eye swelling | 27 | 7.9 5.4–11.5ROR 8.0 · χ² 156 / p 4e-36 | 7.2 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.6 · 88% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Blindness unilateral | 10 | 7.7 4.1–14.3ROR 7.7 · χ² 52 / p 3e-13 | 6.0 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 18.7 | no trial data cached |
| Visual impairment | 49 | 4.3 3.3–5.7ROR 4.4 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28 | 4.1 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 6.3 | no trial data cached |
| Product dose omission issue | 92 | 3.5 2.9–4.3ROR 3.6 · χ² 163 / p 1e-37 | 3.4 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 6.0 · 81% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Accidental overdose | 10 | 3.0 1.6–5.5ROR 3.0 · χ² 11 / p 4e-4 | 2.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.4 | Reporting / coding artifact | – | no trial data cached |
| Product storage error | 21 | 2.6 1.7–4.0ROR 2.6 · χ² 20 / p 5e-6 | 2.5 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.6 | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 14.1 · 81% consumer | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision blurred (blurred vision) | 162 | 12.8 11.1–14.9ROR 13.9 · χ² 1,765 / p <1e-300 | 12.8 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 10.3 · 81% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Ocular hyperaemia | 159 | 36.9 31.8–42.8ROR 40.1 · χ² 5,512 / p <1e-300 | 36.6 EB05 32.1 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 49.9 | no trial data cached |
| Eye pain | 141 | 27.7 23.6–32.4ROR 29.8 · χ² 3,597 / p <1e-300 | 27.5 EB05 23.9 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 20.2 · 87% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye irritation | 116 | 22.5 18.9–26.9ROR 23.9 · χ² 2,367 / p <1e-300 | 22.4 EB05 19.2 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 40.6 · 79% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Lacrimation increased | 94 | 34.1 28.0–41.6ROR 35.8 · χ² 2,983 / p <1e-300 | 33.8 EB05 28.4 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 24.7 · 85% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Intraocular pressure increased (raised eye pressure) | 93 | 78.9 64.6–96.2ROR 82.8 · χ² 7,023 / p <1e-300 | 77.1 EB05 64.8 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious PRR 68.6 | no trial data cached |
| Product dose omission issue | 92 | 3.5 2.9–4.3ROR 3.6 · χ² 163 / p 1e-37 | 3.4 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 6.0 · 81% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Visual acuity reduced | 89 | 28.8 23.5–35.3ROR 30.1 · χ² 2,358 / p <1e-300 | 28.6 EB05 23.9 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 8.0 | no trial data cached |
| Eye pruritus | 70 | 23.0 18.3–28.9ROR 23.8 · χ² 1,450 / p <1e-300 | 22.8 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 25.5 · 78% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Visual impairment | 49 | 4.3 3.3–5.7ROR 4.4 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28 | 4.1 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 6.3 | no trial data cached |
| Dry eye | 43 | 9.6 7.1–12.9ROR 9.8 · χ² 323 / p 1e-72 | 9.1 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.6 · 86% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Photophobia (light sensitivity) | 28 | 16.2 11.2–23.5ROR 16.5 · χ² 385 / p 5e-86 | 15.9 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 17.2 · 79% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye swelling | 27 | 7.9 5.4–11.5ROR 8.0 · χ² 156 / p 4e-36 | 7.2 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.6 · 88% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Product storage error | 21 | 2.6 1.7–4.0ROR 2.6 · χ² 20 / p 5e-6 | 2.5 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.6 | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 14.1 · 81% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye discharge | 21 | 22.3 14.5–34.1ROR 22.5 · χ² 405 / p 3e-90 | 21.8 EB05 15.0 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=4 · 71% consumer | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Ocular hyperaemia — n=159, PRR 36.9
- Eye pruritus — n=70, PRR 23.0
- Eye irritation — n=116, PRR 22.5
- Eye discharge — n=21, PRR 22.3
- Ocular discomfort — n=20, PRR 19.9
- Photophobia — n=28, PRR 16.2
- Uveitis — n=20, PRR 16.0
- Dry eye — n=43, PRR 9.6
- Eye swelling — n=27, PRR 7.9
- Visual impairment — n=49, PRR 4.3
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Netarsudil?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Netarsudil are vision blurred, ocular hyperaemia, eye pain, eye irritation, lacrimation increased, intraocular pressure increased. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Netarsudil have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Netarsudil has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Netarsudil causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 7d4f0e3a-5b86-4c43-982a-813b22ae7e22, effective 20260120; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"NETARSUDIL") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 38 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.