← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Netarsudil side effects: what 1,939 FDA adverse event reports show

Netarsudil · Rhopressa · 38 reaction terms · 1,415 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Rho kinase inhibitor

FDA label, Indications wording

Brand names

Rhopressa

openFDA label

Who reports

1,939 reports · 22% serious · 60 with death outcome · 62% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

RHOPRESSA is indicated for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. RHOPRESSA ® is a Rho kinase inhibitor indicated for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. ( 1 )

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Netarsudil is a Rho kinase inhibitor.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 24 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 4Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 4Not in label — unassessed 13
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 14 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Intraocular pressure increased (raised eye pressure)9378.9
64.6–96.2ROR 82.8 · χ² 7,023 / p <1e-300
77.1 EB05 64.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 68.6no trial data cached
Ocular hyperaemia15936.9
31.8–42.8ROR 40.1 · χ² 5,512 / p <1e-300
36.6 EB05 32.1 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 49.9no trial data cached
Eye pain14127.7
23.6–32.4ROR 29.8 · χ² 3,597 / p <1e-300
27.5 EB05 23.9 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 20.2 · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Eye pruritus7023.0
18.3–28.9ROR 23.8 · χ² 1,450 / p <1e-300
22.8 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 25.5 · 78% consumerno trial data cached
Eye irritation11622.5
18.9–26.9ROR 23.9 · χ² 2,367 / p <1e-300
22.4 EB05 19.2 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 40.6 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Eye discharge2122.3
14.5–34.1ROR 22.5 · χ² 405 / p 3e-90
21.8 EB05 15.0 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4 · 71% consumerno trial data cached
Ocular discomfort2019.9
12.9–30.8ROR 20.1 · χ² 341 / p 2e-76
19.5 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4 · 75% consumerno trial data cached
Product packaging quantity issue2019.8
12.8–30.7ROR 20.0 · χ² 339 / p 6e-76
19.4 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Photophobia (light sensitivity)2816.2
11.2–23.5ROR 16.5 · χ² 385 / p 5e-86
15.9 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 17.2 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Uveitis2016.0
10.4–24.8ROR 16.2 · χ² 267 / p 3e-60
15.5 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.2 · 75% consumerno trial data cached
Eye inflammation1314.9
8.7–25.6ROR 15.0 · χ² 155 / p 7e-36
13.8 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached
Glaucoma2011.2
7.3–17.4ROR 11.3 · χ² 176 / p 2e-40
10.3 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 28.5no trial data cached
Dry eye439.6
7.1–12.9ROR 9.8 · χ² 323 / p 1e-72
9.1 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.6 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Conjunctivitis158.8
5.3–14.6ROR 8.9 · χ² 96 / p 5e-23
7.5 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.9no trial data cached
Eye swelling277.9
5.4–11.5ROR 8.0 · χ² 156 / p 4e-36
7.2 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.6 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Blindness unilateral107.7
4.1–14.3ROR 7.7 · χ² 52 / p 3e-13
6.0 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.7no trial data cached
Visual impairment494.3
3.3–5.7ROR 4.4 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28
4.1 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Product dose omission issue923.5
2.9–4.3ROR 3.6 · χ² 163 / p 1e-37
3.4 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.0 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Accidental overdose103.0
1.6–5.5ROR 3.0 · χ² 11 / p 4e-4
2.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.4Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Product storage error212.6
1.7–4.0ROR 2.6 · χ² 20 / p 5e-6
2.5 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.6Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 14.1 · 81% consumerno trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Ocular hyperaemia15936.9
31.8–42.8ROR 40.1 · χ² 5,512 / p <1e-300
36.6 EB05 32.1 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 49.9no trial data cached
Eye pain14127.7
23.6–32.4ROR 29.8 · χ² 3,597 / p <1e-300
27.5 EB05 23.9 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 20.2 · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Eye irritation11622.5
18.9–26.9ROR 23.9 · χ² 2,367 / p <1e-300
22.4 EB05 19.2 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 40.6 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Intraocular pressure increased (raised eye pressure)9378.9
64.6–96.2ROR 82.8 · χ² 7,023 / p <1e-300
77.1 EB05 64.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 68.6no trial data cached
Product dose omission issue923.5
2.9–4.3ROR 3.6 · χ² 163 / p 1e-37
3.4 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.0 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Eye pruritus7023.0
18.3–28.9ROR 23.8 · χ² 1,450 / p <1e-300
22.8 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 25.5 · 78% consumerno trial data cached
Visual impairment494.3
3.3–5.7ROR 4.4 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28
4.1 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Dry eye439.6
7.1–12.9ROR 9.8 · χ² 323 / p 1e-72
9.1 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.6 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Photophobia (light sensitivity)2816.2
11.2–23.5ROR 16.5 · χ² 385 / p 5e-86
15.9 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 17.2 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Eye swelling277.9
5.4–11.5ROR 8.0 · χ² 156 / p 4e-36
7.2 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.6 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Product storage error212.6
1.7–4.0ROR 2.6 · χ² 20 / p 5e-6
2.5 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.6Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 14.1 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Eye discharge2122.3
14.5–34.1ROR 22.5 · χ² 405 / p 3e-90
21.8 EB05 15.0 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4 · 71% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Netarsudil?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Netarsudil are vision blurred, ocular hyperaemia, eye pain, eye irritation, lacrimation increased, intraocular pressure increased. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Netarsudil have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Netarsudil has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Netarsudil causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.