Nimodipine side effects: what 1,103 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker
Who reports
1,103 reports · 87% serious · 112 with death outcome · 65% female
Used for
Nimodipine is indicated for the improvement of neurological outcome by reducing the incidence and severity of ischemic deficits in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage from ruptured intracranial berry aneurysms regardless of their post-ictus neurological condition (i.e., Hunt and Hess Grades I to V).
What it is
DESCRIPTION Nimodipine belongs to the class of pharmacological agents known as calcium channel blockers. Nimodipine is isopropyl 2-methoxyethyl 1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-4-( m -nitrophenyl)-3,5-pyridinedicarboxylate. It has a molecular weight of 418.5 and a molecular formula of C 21 H 26 N 2 O 7 .
Boxed warning
DO NOT ADMINISTER NIMODIPINE INTRAVENOUSLY OR BY OTHER PARENTERAL ROUTES. DEATHS AND SERIOUS, LIFE THREATENING ADVERSE EVENTS HAVE OCCURRED WHEN THE CONTENTS OF NIMODIPINE CAPSULES HAVE BEEN INJECTED PARENTERALLY (See WARNINGS and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ).
Causality screen of the 21 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled — boxed warning The term (or its clinical synonym) appears in the FDA boxed warning: causality is regulator-recognised and considered serious.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 19 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subarachnoid haemorrhage | 42 | 78.5 58.3–105.6ROR 81.5 · χ² 3,124 / p <1e-300 | 75.6 EB05 58.3 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious PRR 51.6 | no trial data cached |
| Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome | 23 | 46.0 30.7–69.0ROR 47.0 · χ² 967 / p 1e-212 | 44.4 EB05 31.1 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 30.3 · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Brain injury | 22 | 41.8 27.6–63.2ROR 42.6 · χ² 833 / p 1e-183 | 40.3 EB05 28.1 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 27.9 · ♀ 0% (drug 65%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Sinus bradycardia | 21 | 41.3 27.0–63.1ROR 42.1 · χ² 785 / p 6e-173 | 39.8 EB05 27.5 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 28.0 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Cardiogenic shock | 27 | 36.0 24.8–52.3ROR 36.9 · χ² 884 / p 2e-194 | 35.2 EB05 25.4 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 23.7 · ♀ 8% (drug 65%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Polyneuropathy | 20 | 32.0 20.7–49.4ROR 32.6 · χ² 570 / p 3e-126 | 31.1 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 21.3 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Brain oedema | 16 | 24.1 14.8–39.2ROR 24.5 · χ² 332 / p 2e-74 | 23.4 EB05 15.2 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 16.1 | no trial data cached |
| Cholestasis (bile flow blockage) | 20 | 19.9 12.9–30.8ROR 20.3 · χ² 341 / p 2e-76 | 19.5 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 13.3 | no trial data cached |
| Lactic acidosis | 27 | 16.0 11.0–23.2ROR 16.4 · χ² 365 / p 1e-81 | 15.7 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.6 · ♀ 21% (drug 65%) · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Premature baby | 22 | 13.9 9.2–21.0ROR 14.1 · χ² 250 / p 1e-56 | 13.3 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.3 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Impaired work ability | 15 | 13.3 8.0–22.0ROR 13.5 · χ² 159 / p 1e-36 | 12.2 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 11.2 | no trial data cached |
| Cerebral infarction | 17 | 13.2 8.2–21.2ROR 13.4 · χ² 180 / p 2e-41 | 12.3 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 8.2 | no trial data cached |
| Ischaemic stroke | 11 | 11.7 6.5–21.1ROR 11.8 · χ² 97 / p 3e-23 | 9.8 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious PRR 7.7 | no trial data cached |
| Hemiparesis | 10 | 11.2 6.0–20.7ROR 11.3 · χ² 83 / p 5e-20 | 9.1 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 8.0 | no trial data cached |
| Cardiovascular disorder | 15 | 11.2 6.7–18.4ROR 11.3 · χ² 129 / p 4e-30 | 9.8 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 7.9 | no trial data cached |
| Nervous system disorder | 17 | 10.3 6.4–16.6ROR 10.5 · χ² 134 / p 3e-31 | 9.1 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 7.6 | no trial data cached |
| Cognitive disorder | 25 | 10.2 6.9–15.1ROR 10.4 · χ² 199 / p 2e-45 | 9.4 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.5 · ♀ 5% (drug 65%) · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Intentional overdose | 26 | 7.8 5.3–11.3ROR 7.9 · χ² 147 / p 5e-34 | 7.0 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 5.3 · ♀ 0% (drug 65%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Cerebral haemorrhage | 14 | 7.4 4.4–12.5ROR 7.5 · χ² 72 / p 1e-17 | 6.2 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious PRR 4.9 | no trial data cached |
| Sedation | 10 | 7.3 3.9–13.5ROR 7.4 · χ² 48 / p 2e-12 | 5.7 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 6.6 | no trial data cached |
| Foetal exposure during pregnancy | 22 | 5.1 3.4–7.8ROR 5.2 · χ² 70 / p 3e-17 | 4.7 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 3.5 · ♀ 85% (drug 65%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subarachnoid haemorrhage | 42 | 78.5 58.3–105.6ROR 81.5 · χ² 3,124 / p <1e-300 | 75.6 EB05 58.3 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious PRR 51.6 | no trial data cached |
| Lactic acidosis | 27 | 16.0 11.0–23.2ROR 16.4 · χ² 365 / p 1e-81 | 15.7 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.6 · ♀ 21% (drug 65%) · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Cardiogenic shock | 27 | 36.0 24.8–52.3ROR 36.9 · χ² 884 / p 2e-194 | 35.2 EB05 25.4 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 23.7 · ♀ 8% (drug 65%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Intentional overdose | 26 | 7.8 5.3–11.3ROR 7.9 · χ² 147 / p 5e-34 | 7.0 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 5.3 · ♀ 0% (drug 65%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Cognitive disorder | 25 | 10.2 6.9–15.1ROR 10.4 · χ² 199 / p 2e-45 | 9.4 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.5 · ♀ 5% (drug 65%) · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome | 23 | 46.0 30.7–69.0ROR 47.0 · χ² 967 / p 1e-212 | 44.4 EB05 31.1 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 30.3 · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Foetal exposure during pregnancy | 22 | 5.1 3.4–7.8ROR 5.2 · χ² 70 / p 3e-17 | 4.7 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 3.5 · ♀ 85% (drug 65%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Premature baby | 22 | 13.9 9.2–21.0ROR 14.1 · χ² 250 / p 1e-56 | 13.3 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.3 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Brain injury | 22 | 41.8 27.6–63.2ROR 42.6 · χ² 833 / p 1e-183 | 40.3 EB05 28.1 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 27.9 · ♀ 0% (drug 65%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Sinus bradycardia | 21 | 41.3 27.0–63.1ROR 42.1 · χ² 785 / p 6e-173 | 39.8 EB05 27.5 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 28.0 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Cholestasis (bile flow blockage) | 20 | 19.9 12.9–30.8ROR 20.3 · χ² 341 / p 2e-76 | 19.5 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 13.3 | no trial data cached |
| Polyneuropathy | 20 | 32.0 20.7–49.4ROR 32.6 · χ² 570 / p 3e-126 | 31.1 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 21.3 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Nervous system disorder | 17 | 10.3 6.4–16.6ROR 10.5 · χ² 134 / p 3e-31 | 9.1 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 7.6 | no trial data cached |
| Cerebral infarction | 17 | 13.2 8.2–21.2ROR 13.4 · χ² 180 / p 2e-41 | 12.3 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 8.2 | no trial data cached |
| Brain oedema | 16 | 24.1 14.8–39.2ROR 24.5 · χ² 332 / p 2e-74 | 23.4 EB05 15.2 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 16.1 | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome — n=23, PRR 46.0
- Brain injury — n=22, PRR 41.8
- Sinus bradycardia — n=21, PRR 41.3
- Cardiogenic shock — n=27, PRR 36.0
- Polyneuropathy — n=20, PRR 32.0
- Cholestasis — n=20, PRR 19.9
- Lactic acidosis — n=27, PRR 16.0
- Premature baby — n=22, PRR 13.9
- Cognitive disorder — n=25, PRR 10.2
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Nimodipine?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Nimodipine are subarachnoid haemorrhage, lactic acidosis, cardiogenic shock, cognitive disorder, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, premature baby. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Nimodipine have an FDA boxed warning?
Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: DO NOT ADMINISTER NIMODIPINE INTRAVENOUSLY OR BY OTHER PARENTERAL ROUTES. DEATHS AND SERIOUS, LIFE THREATENING ADVERSE EVENTS HAVE OCCURRED WHEN THE CONTENTS OF NIMODIPINE CAPSULES HAVE BEEN INJECTED PARENTERALLY (See WARNINGS and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ).
Do FAERS signals prove that Nimodipine causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID a323ebd8-ef1b-439b-93d1-ba73a5b0127d, effective 20240816; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"NIMODIPINE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 40 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.