← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Nirogacestat side effects: what 826 FDA adverse event reports show

Nirogacestat · Ogsiveo · 28 reaction terms · 386 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Gamma Secretase Inhibitor

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Brand names

Ogsiveo

openFDA label

Who reports

826 reports · 29% serious · 8 with death outcome · 66% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

OGSIVEO is indicated for adult patients with progressing desmoid tumors who require systemic treatment. OGSIVEO is a gamma secretase inhibitor indicated for adult patients with progressing desmoid tumors who require systemic treatment. ( 1 )

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

OGSIVEO oral tablets contain nirogacestat (as nirogacestat hydrobromide), a gamma (ɣ) secretase inhibitor. Nirogacestat hydrobromide is chemically known as (S)-2-(((S)-6,8-Difluoro-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-2-yl)amino)-N-(1-(2-methyl-1-(neopentylamino)propan-2-yl)-1H-imidazol-4-yl) pentanamide dihydrobromide.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 23 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 4Reporting / coding artifact 4Not in label — unassessed 15
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 5 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Product dose omission in error4239.2
29.2–52.6ROR 41.2 · χ² 1,525 / p <1e-300
38.5 EB05 29.7 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 81.3 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Amenorrhoea (missed periods)1725.5
15.9–40.8ROR 26.0 · χ² 376 / p 4e-84
24.8 EB05 16.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 48.3no trial data cached
Dry throat1024.7
13.3–45.7ROR 25.0 · χ² 204 / p 1e-46
23.4 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached
Stomatitis (mouth sores)5924.4
19.0–31.2ROR 26.1 · χ² 1,301 / p 4e-285
24.2 EB05 19.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 23.7 · 78% consumerno trial data cached
Folliculitis819.4
9.7–38.7ROR 19.6 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28
17.5 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 17.2no trial data cached
Intentional dose omission1917.4
11.2–27.1ROR 17.8 · χ² 278 / p 1e-62
16.9 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 15.1no trial data cached
Brain fog1017.2
9.3–31.8ROR 17.4 · χ² 136 / p 8e-32
15.7 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.3no trial data cached
Insurance issue915.2
7.9–29.1ROR 15.3 · χ² 105 / p 5e-25
13.2 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.0no trial data cached
Thirst1014.0
7.6–26.0ROR 14.2 · χ² 108 / p 1e-25
12.2 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.5no trial data cached
Epistaxis (nosebleed)3712.4
9.0–16.9ROR 12.9 · χ² 376 / p 4e-84
12.0 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 9.9no trial data cached
Neoplasm progression1712.1
7.6–19.4ROR 12.4 · χ² 163 / p 1e-37
11.1 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.8no trial data cached
Cyst612.1
5.4–26.8ROR 12.2 · χ² 50 / p 6e-13
8.5 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 21.2no trial data cached
Hot flush (hot flashes)3511.6
8.4–16.1ROR 12.1 · χ² 330 / p 4e-74
11.2 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.2 · ♀ 97% (drug 66%) · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Ocular discomfort511.5
4.8–27.6ROR 11.6 · χ² 38 / p 3e-10
7.5 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=2no trial data cached
Rash maculo-papular1011.3
6.1–20.9ROR 11.4 · χ² 84 / p 3e-20
9.2 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.1no trial data cached
Intestinal perforation511.1
4.6–26.7ROR 11.2 · χ² 37 / p 7e-10
7.2 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.5no trial data cached
Impaired driving ability511.0
4.6–26.4ROR 11.1 · χ² 36 / p 1e-9
7.1 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.8no trial data cached
Skin cancer910.5
5.5–20.0ROR 10.6 · χ² 68 / p 9e-17
8.1 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 19.1no trial data cached
Therapy cessation167.8
4.8–12.7ROR 8.0 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21
6.7 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.0no trial data cached
Underdose206.9
4.4–10.6ROR 7.0 · χ² 94 / p 1e-22
6.0 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 31.5 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Cytokine release syndrome56.6
2.7–15.7ROR 6.6 · χ² 18 / p 9e-6
4.4 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.3no trial data cached
Peritonitis56.0
2.5–14.5ROR 6.1 · χ² 16 / p 3e-5
4.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.2no trial data cached
Skin irritation84.4
2.2–8.7ROR 4.4 · χ² 18 / p 1e-5
3.6 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedserious n=3no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Stomatitis (mouth sores)5924.4
19.0–31.2ROR 26.1 · χ² 1,301 / p 4e-285
24.2 EB05 19.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 23.7 · 78% consumerno trial data cached
Product dose omission in error4239.2
29.2–52.6ROR 41.2 · χ² 1,525 / p <1e-300
38.5 EB05 29.7 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 81.3 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Epistaxis (nosebleed)3712.4
9.0–16.9ROR 12.9 · χ² 376 / p 4e-84
12.0 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 9.9no trial data cached
Hot flush (hot flashes)3511.6
8.4–16.1ROR 12.1 · χ² 330 / p 4e-74
11.2 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.2 · ♀ 97% (drug 66%) · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Underdose206.9
4.4–10.6ROR 7.0 · χ² 94 / p 1e-22
6.0 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 31.5 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Intentional dose omission1917.4
11.2–27.1ROR 17.8 · χ² 278 / p 1e-62
16.9 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 15.1no trial data cached
Neoplasm progression1712.1
7.6–19.4ROR 12.4 · χ² 163 / p 1e-37
11.1 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.8no trial data cached
Amenorrhoea (missed periods)1725.5
15.9–40.8ROR 26.0 · χ² 376 / p 4e-84
24.8 EB05 16.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 48.3no trial data cached
Therapy cessation167.8
4.8–12.7ROR 8.0 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21
6.7 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.0no trial data cached
Rash maculo-papular1011.3
6.1–20.9ROR 11.4 · χ² 84 / p 3e-20
9.2 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.1no trial data cached
Thirst1014.0
7.6–26.0ROR 14.2 · χ² 108 / p 1e-25
12.2 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.5no trial data cached
Brain fog1017.2
9.3–31.8ROR 17.4 · χ² 136 / p 8e-32
15.7 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.3no trial data cached
Dry throat1024.7
13.3–45.7ROR 25.0 · χ² 204 / p 1e-46
23.4 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached
Skin cancer910.5
5.5–20.0ROR 10.6 · χ² 68 / p 9e-17
8.1 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 19.1no trial data cached
Insurance issue915.2
7.9–29.1ROR 15.3 · χ² 105 / p 5e-25
13.2 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.0no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Nirogacestat?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Nirogacestat are stomatitis, epistaxis, hot flush, neoplasm progression, amenorrhoea, rash maculo-papular. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Nirogacestat have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Nirogacestat has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Nirogacestat causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.