← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Norethindrone and Ethinyl Estradiol side effects: what 1,147 FDA adverse event reports show

Norethindrone And Ethinyl Estradiol · 35 reaction terms · 290 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Progestin

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) of the closest related product

Label matched

Norethindrone (Norethindrone)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

1,147 reports · 43% serious · 22 with death outcome · 99% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

1. Indications Progestin-only oral contraceptives are indicated for the prevention of pregnancy. 2. Efficacy If used perfectly, the first-year failure rate for progestin-only oral contraceptives is 0.3%. However, the typical failure rate is estimated to be closer to 9%, due to late or omitted pills. Table 1 lists the pregnancy rates for users of all major methods of contraception.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 21 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 2Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 4Not in label — unassessed 11
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 14 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Metrorrhagia2223.3
15.4–35.2ROR 23.7 · χ² 446 / p 2e-99
22.8 EB05 15.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Coeliac disease1222.4
12.7–39.3ROR 22.6 · χ² 224 / p 7e-51
21.4 EB05 12.7 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 36.9no trial data cached
Dysmenorrhoea1318.2
10.6–31.2ROR 18.4 · χ² 194 / p 2e-44
17.3 EB05 10.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Menorrhagia (heavy periods)1110.1
5.6–18.2ROR 10.2 · χ² 81 / p 1e-19
8.2 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 19.2no trial data cached
Inflammatory bowel disease59.3
3.9–22.3ROR 9.3 · χ² 29 / p 3e-8
5.9 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.6no trial data cached
Vaginal haemorrhage219.0
5.9–13.8ROR 9.2 · χ² 142 / p 5e-33
8.0 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Back injury58.4
3.5–20.2ROR 8.5 · χ² 26 / p 2e-7
5.4 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.8no trial data cached
Product substitution issue206.3
4.1–9.8ROR 6.4 · χ² 85 / p 1e-20
5.6 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.0no trial data cached
Amenorrhoea (missed periods)55.5
2.3–13.1ROR 5.5 · χ² 14 / p 9e-5
3.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.4Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 6.6no trial data cached
Pregnancy65.4
2.4–12.0ROR 5.4 · χ² 17 / p 1e-5
4.0 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 10.5no trial data cached
Exposure during pregnancy164.7
2.9–7.6ROR 4.8 · χ² 43 / p 3e-11
4.2 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.1no trial data cached
Activities of daily living impaired54.5
1.9–10.9ROR 4.6 · χ² 11 / p 6e-4
3.4 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.2Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.9no trial data cached
Product dispensing error54.2
1.8–10.1ROR 4.2 · χ² 9 / p 0.001
3.2 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.1Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1no trial data cached
Product dose omission143.9
2.3–6.5ROR 3.9 · χ² 27 / p 1e-7
3.5 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.5no trial data cached
Injection site bruising122.8
1.6–4.9ROR 2.8 · χ² 12 / p 3e-4
2.6 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Extra dose administered62.7
1.2–6.1ROR 2.8 · χ² 5 / p 0.012
2.4 EB05 1.2 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached
Injection site pruritus102.7
1.5–5.1ROR 2.8 · χ² 9 / p 0.001
2.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.3Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Injection site erythema (redness where injected)182.7
1.7–4.2ROR 2.7 · χ² 17 / p 2e-5
2.5 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.4no trial data cached
Multiple sclerosis relapse102.6
1.4–4.9ROR 2.7 · χ² 9 / p 0.002
2.4 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.2Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.0no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Metrorrhagia2223.3
15.4–35.2ROR 23.7 · χ² 446 / p 2e-99
22.8 EB05 15.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Vaginal haemorrhage219.0
5.9–13.8ROR 9.2 · χ² 142 / p 5e-33
8.0 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Product substitution issue206.3
4.1–9.8ROR 6.4 · χ² 85 / p 1e-20
5.6 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.0no trial data cached
Injection site erythema (redness where injected)182.7
1.7–4.2ROR 2.7 · χ² 17 / p 2e-5
2.5 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.4no trial data cached
Exposure during pregnancy164.7
2.9–7.6ROR 4.8 · χ² 43 / p 3e-11
4.2 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.1no trial data cached
Product dose omission143.9
2.3–6.5ROR 3.9 · χ² 27 / p 1e-7
3.5 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.5no trial data cached
Dysmenorrhoea1318.2
10.6–31.2ROR 18.4 · χ² 194 / p 2e-44
17.3 EB05 10.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Injection site bruising122.8
1.6–4.9ROR 2.8 · χ² 12 / p 3e-4
2.6 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Coeliac disease1222.4
12.7–39.3ROR 22.6 · χ² 224 / p 7e-51
21.4 EB05 12.7 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 36.9no trial data cached
Menorrhagia (heavy periods)1110.1
5.6–18.2ROR 10.2 · χ² 81 / p 1e-19
8.2 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 19.2no trial data cached
Multiple sclerosis relapse102.6
1.4–4.9ROR 2.7 · χ² 9 / p 0.002
2.4 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.2Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.0no trial data cached
Injection site pruritus102.7
1.5–5.1ROR 2.8 · χ² 9 / p 0.001
2.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.3Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Dermatitis atopic62.2
1.0–4.9ROR 2.2 · χ² 3 / p 0.047
2.0 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.4
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol ↔ Pulmonary embolism (venous thromboembolism).

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Norethindrone and Ethinyl Estradiol?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Norethindrone and Ethinyl Estradiol are metrorrhagia, vaginal haemorrhage, injection site erythema, dysmenorrhoea, injection site bruising, coeliac disease. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Norethindrone and Ethinyl Estradiol have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Norethindrone and Ethinyl Estradiol has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Norethindrone and Ethinyl Estradiol causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.