← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Norgestrel and Ethinyl Estradiol side effects: what 904 FDA adverse event reports show

Norgestrel And Ethinyl Estradiol · 24 reaction terms · 326 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Norgestrel (Daily Oral Contraceptive)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

904 reports · 41% serious · 12 with death outcome · 99% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

To prevent pregnancy

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 16 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 2Not in label — unassessed 11
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 8 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Unintended pregnancy45100.2
75.3–133.3ROR 105.4 · χ² 4,304 / p <1e-300
95.8 EB05 74.5 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 53.2 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Metrorrhagia4357.8
43.2–77.4ROR 60.6 · χ² 2,340 / p <1e-300
56.3 EB05 43.5 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Menorrhagia (heavy periods)2225.6
17.0–38.8ROR 26.3 · χ² 496 / p 3e-110
25.1 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 36.9no trial data cached
Dysmenorrhoea1221.3
12.1–37.4ROR 21.6 · χ² 212 / p 2e-48
20.4 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached
Vaginal haemorrhage2714.7
10.1–21.3ROR 15.1 · χ² 332 / p 2e-74
14.3 EB05 10.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.3 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Menstruation irregular1311.4
6.6–19.5ROR 11.5 · χ² 113 / p 1e-26
9.8 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=3no trial data cached
Product quality issue6611.4
9.0–14.3ROR 12.2 · χ² 617 / p 2e-136
11.1 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 21.3 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Impaired quality of life711.3
5.4–23.6ROR 11.4 · χ² 56 / p 4e-14
8.3 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.7no trial data cached
Menstruation delayed511.2
4.7–26.8ROR 11.2 · χ² 37 / p 7e-10
7.2 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Amenorrhoea (missed periods)79.7
4.7–20.4ROR 9.8 · χ² 46 / p 5e-12
7.0 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.9no trial data cached
Product physical issue67.0
3.1–15.5ROR 7.0 · χ² 25 / p 3e-7
4.9 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=2no trial data cached
Emotional disorder96.7
3.5–12.9ROR 6.8 · χ² 38 / p 3e-10
5.2 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.8no trial data cached
Pregnancy55.7
2.4–13.7ROR 5.8 · χ² 15 / p 5e-5
4.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.4Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 11.8no trial data cached
Dermatitis atopic104.6
2.5–8.6ROR 4.7 · χ² 25 / p 3e-7
3.9 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached
Multiple sclerosis relapse113.7
2.1–6.6ROR 3.7 · χ² 19 / p 6e-6
3.3 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.3no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Product quality issue6611.4
9.0–14.3ROR 12.2 · χ² 617 / p 2e-136
11.1 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 21.3 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Unintended pregnancy45100.2
75.3–133.3ROR 105.4 · χ² 4,304 / p <1e-300
95.8 EB05 74.5 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 53.2 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Metrorrhagia4357.8
43.2–77.4ROR 60.6 · χ² 2,340 / p <1e-300
56.3 EB05 43.5 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Vaginal haemorrhage2714.7
10.1–21.3ROR 15.1 · χ² 332 / p 2e-74
14.3 EB05 10.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.3 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Menorrhagia (heavy periods)2225.6
17.0–38.8ROR 26.3 · χ² 496 / p 3e-110
25.1 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 36.9no trial data cached
Menstruation irregular1311.4
6.6–19.5ROR 11.5 · χ² 113 / p 1e-26
9.8 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=3no trial data cached
Dysmenorrhoea1221.3
12.1–37.4ROR 21.6 · χ² 212 / p 2e-48
20.4 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached
Multiple sclerosis relapse113.7
2.1–6.6ROR 3.7 · χ² 19 / p 6e-6
3.3 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.3no trial data cached
Dermatitis atopic104.6
2.5–8.6ROR 4.7 · χ² 25 / p 3e-7
3.9 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached
Emotional disorder96.7
3.5–12.9ROR 6.8 · χ² 38 / p 3e-10
5.2 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.8no trial data cached
Amenorrhoea (missed periods)79.7
4.7–20.4ROR 9.8 · χ² 46 / p 5e-12
7.0 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.9no trial data cached
Impaired quality of life711.3
5.4–23.6ROR 11.4 · χ² 56 / p 4e-14
8.3 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.7no trial data cached
Product physical issue67.0
3.1–15.5ROR 7.0 · χ² 25 / p 3e-7
4.9 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=2no trial data cached
Pregnancy55.7
2.4–13.7ROR 5.8 · χ² 15 / p 5e-5
4.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.4Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 11.8no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol ↔ Pulmonary embolism (venous thromboembolism).

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Norgestrel and Ethinyl Estradiol?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Norgestrel and Ethinyl Estradiol are unintended pregnancy, metrorrhagia, vaginal haemorrhage, menorrhagia, menstruation irregular, dysmenorrhoea. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Norgestrel and Ethinyl Estradiol have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Norgestrel and Ethinyl Estradiol has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Norgestrel and Ethinyl Estradiol causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.