← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Pegcetacoplan side effects: what 1,779 FDA adverse event reports show

Pegcetacoplan · Empaveli · 62 reaction terms · 1,468 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Complement Inhibitor

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Empaveli

openFDA label

Who reports

1,779 reports · 66% serious · 103 with death outcome · 63% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

EMPAVELI is a complement inhibitor indicated: for the treatment of adult patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). ( 1.1 ) for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 12 years and older with C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) or primary immune-complex membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN), to reduce proteinuria and the loss of kidney function.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

EMPAVELI contains pegcetacoplan, a complement inhibitor. Pegcetacoplan is a symmetrical molecule comprised of two identical pentadecapeptides covalently bound to the ends of a linear 40-kiloDalton (kDa) PEG molecule.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

SERIOUS INFECTIONS CAUSED BY ENCAPSULATED BACTERIA EMPAVELI, a complement inhibitor, increases the risk of serious infections, especially those caused by encapsulated bacteria, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae , Neisseria meningitidis , and Haemophilus influenzae type B [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] .

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 36 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 11Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 2Lab value / disease marker 3Not in label — unassessed 17
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 26 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Vitreous floaters112137.1
114.5–164.2ROR 146.3 · χ² 14,832 / p <1e-300
132.5 EB05 113.2 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=55no trial data cached
Eye inflammation6683.0
65.5–105.3ROR 86.2 · χ² 5,233 / p <1e-300
80.6 EB05 65.6 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39no trial data cached
Uveitis7868.5
55.1–85.1ROR 71.5 · χ² 5,090 / p <1e-300
67.0 EB05 55.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 60.5 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Intraocular pressure increased (raised eye pressure)5348.8
37.4–63.7ROR 50.3 · χ² 2,428 / p <1e-300
47.9 EB05 38.0 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 49.5no trial data cached
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased4231.1
23.1–42.0ROR 31.9 · χ² 1,192 / p 1e-261
30.7 EB05 23.6 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 24.6no trial data cached
Ocular discomfort1617.4
10.7–28.3ROR 17.5 · χ² 231 / p 2e-52
16.7 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Chromaturia2915.1
10.6–21.7ROR 15.4 · χ² 369 / p 1e-82
14.8 EB05 10.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.6no trial data cached
Haemoglobin decreased12414.2
12.0–16.9ROR 15.2 · χ² 1,516 / p <1e-300
14.1 EB05 12.2 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 12.0no trial data cached
Blindness4713.6
10.3–18.1ROR 14.0 · χ² 538 / p 3e-119
13.4 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.6no trial data cached
Visual impairment13713.1
11.2–15.4ROR 14.2 · χ² 1,532 / p <1e-300
13.1 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.6no trial data cached
Photophobia (light sensitivity)1912.0
7.7–18.8ROR 12.1 · χ² 181 / p 2e-41
11.1 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.5no trial data cached
Visual acuity reduced3311.6
8.3–16.3ROR 11.8 · χ² 310 / p 1e-69
11.1 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.7no trial data cached
Cytopenia1110.9
6.0–19.6ROR 10.9 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21
8.9 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 9.7no trial data cached
Myelodysplastic syndrome1310.6
6.2–18.2ROR 10.7 · χ² 104 / p 1e-24
9.0 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.3no trial data cached
Brain fog1310.5
6.1–18.1ROR 10.6 · χ² 103 / p 2e-24
8.9 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.4no trial data cached
Incorrect product administration duration169.3
5.7–15.1ROR 9.4 · χ² 110 / p 4e-26
8.0 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=2no trial data cached
Blood urine present159.3
5.6–15.4ROR 9.4 · χ² 103 / p 2e-24
7.9 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 7.7no trial data cached
Bone marrow failure169.2
5.7–15.0ROR 9.3 · χ² 109 / p 7e-26
7.9 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.0no trial data cached
Ocular hyperaemia338.3
5.9–11.7ROR 8.5 · χ² 206 / p 5e-47
7.7 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.8no trial data cached
Glaucoma138.0
4.6–13.7ROR 8.0 · χ² 72 / p 9e-18
6.5 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Viral infection176.0
3.8–9.7ROR 6.1 · χ² 66 / p 2e-16
5.2 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.5no trial data cached
Intentional dose omission135.6
3.3–9.6ROR 5.6 · χ² 45 / p 1e-11
4.7 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.4no trial data cached
Vision blurred (blurred vision)635.4
4.3–6.9ROR 5.6 · χ² 225 / p 3e-51
5.2 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.4no trial data cached
Dry eye194.6
3.0–7.2ROR 4.7 · χ² 50 / p 6e-13
4.2 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.1no trial data cached
Needle issue104.1
2.2–7.6ROR 4.1 · χ² 21 / p 3e-6
3.5 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Visual impairment13713.1
11.2–15.4ROR 14.2 · χ² 1,532 / p <1e-300
13.1 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.6no trial data cached
Haemoglobin decreased12414.2
12.0–16.9ROR 15.2 · χ² 1,516 / p <1e-300
14.1 EB05 12.2 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 12.0no trial data cached
Vitreous floaters112137.1
114.5–164.2ROR 146.3 · χ² 14,832 / p <1e-300
132.5 EB05 113.2 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=55no trial data cached
Uveitis7868.5
55.1–85.1ROR 71.5 · χ² 5,090 / p <1e-300
67.0 EB05 55.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 60.5 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Eye inflammation6683.0
65.5–105.3ROR 86.2 · χ² 5,233 / p <1e-300
80.6 EB05 65.6 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39no trial data cached
Vision blurred (blurred vision)635.4
4.3–6.9ROR 5.6 · χ² 225 / p 3e-51
5.2 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.4no trial data cached
Intraocular pressure increased (raised eye pressure)5348.8
37.4–63.7ROR 50.3 · χ² 2,428 / p <1e-300
47.9 EB05 38.0 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 49.5no trial data cached
Blindness4713.6
10.3–18.1ROR 14.0 · χ² 538 / p 3e-119
13.4 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.6no trial data cached
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased4231.1
23.1–42.0ROR 31.9 · χ² 1,192 / p 1e-261
30.7 EB05 23.6 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 24.6no trial data cached
Ocular hyperaemia338.3
5.9–11.7ROR 8.5 · χ² 206 / p 5e-47
7.7 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.8no trial data cached
Visual acuity reduced3311.6
8.3–16.3ROR 11.8 · χ² 310 / p 1e-69
11.1 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.7no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Pegcetacoplan?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Pegcetacoplan are visual impairment, haemoglobin decreased, vitreous floaters, uveitis, eye inflammation, vision blurred. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Pegcetacoplan have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: SERIOUS INFECTIONS CAUSED BY ENCAPSULATED BACTERIA EMPAVELI, a complement inhibitor, increases the risk of serious infections, especially those caused by encapsulated bacteria, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae , Neisseria meningitidis , and Haemophilus influenzae type B [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] .

Do FAERS signals prove that Pegcetacoplan causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.