← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Pemigatinib side effects: what 820 FDA adverse event reports show

Pemigatinib · Pemazyre · 19 reaction terms · 407 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Kinase Inhibitor

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Pemazyre

openFDA label

Who reports

820 reports · 63% serious · 144 with death outcome · 56% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

PEMAZYRE is a kinase inhibitor indicated: for the treatment of adults with previously treated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with a fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusion or other rearrangement as detected by an FDA-approved test. ( 1 , 2.1 ) This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Pemigatinib is a kinase inhibitor with the chemical name 3-(2,6-difluoro-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-ethyl-8-(morpholin-4-ylmethyl)-1,3,4,7-tetrahydro-2 H -pyrrolo[3',2':5,6]pyrido[4,3- d ]pyrimidin-2-one. Pemigatinib has a molecular formula of C 24 H 27 F 2 N 5 O 4 and molecular mass of 487.5 g/mole.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 16 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 3Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 3Not in label — unassessed 6
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 3 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hospice care1846.8
29.6–73.9ROR 47.8 · χ² 760 / p 1e-167
44.6 EB05 29.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.7no trial data cached
Retinal detachment1644.5
27.4–72.3ROR 45.4 · χ² 637 / p 8e-141
42.4 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 41.3no trial data cached
Disease progression14030.4
26.1–35.3ROR 36.4 · χ² 3,963 / p <1e-300
30.2 EB05 26.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 31.3 · ♀ 34% (drug 56%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Product availability issue2427.4
18.4–40.6ROR 28.2 · χ² 584 / p 3e-129
26.8 EB05 19.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.0no trial data cached
Taste disorder2126.8
17.6–40.9ROR 27.5 · χ² 496 / p 4e-110
26.2 EB05 18.1 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.8 · 70% consumerno trial data cached
Acute myeloid leukaemia1016.4
8.9–30.4ROR 16.6 · χ² 130 / p 2e-30
14.9 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 15.1no trial data cached
Ageusia (loss of taste)1616.3
10.1–26.6ROR 16.7 · χ² 216 / p 4e-49
15.7 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.3no trial data cached
Metastases to liver1116.0
8.9–28.8ROR 16.2 · χ² 140 / p 1e-32
14.7 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.8no trial data cached
Dry eye3015.8
11.1–22.5ROR 16.4 · χ² 403 / p 8e-90
15.5 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 13.2no trial data cached
Stomatitis (mouth sores)3414.3
10.3–19.9ROR 14.9 · χ² 409 / p 3e-91
14.0 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.0no trial data cached
Metastases to lung613.3
6.0–29.5ROR 13.4 · χ² 56 / p 3e-14
9.7 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.3no trial data cached
Metastases to bone69.4
4.2–20.8ROR 9.4 · χ² 37 / p 6e-10
6.4 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.7no trial data cached
Therapy interrupted217.8
5.1–11.9ROR 8.0 · χ² 118 / p 1e-27
6.9 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 10.1no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Disease progression14030.4
26.1–35.3ROR 36.4 · χ² 3,963 / p <1e-300
30.2 EB05 26.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 31.3 · ♀ 34% (drug 56%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Stomatitis (mouth sores)3414.3
10.3–19.9ROR 14.9 · χ² 409 / p 3e-91
14.0 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.0no trial data cached
Dry eye3015.8
11.1–22.5ROR 16.4 · χ² 403 / p 8e-90
15.5 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 13.2no trial data cached
Product availability issue2427.4
18.4–40.6ROR 28.2 · χ² 584 / p 3e-129
26.8 EB05 19.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.0no trial data cached
Therapy interrupted217.8
5.1–11.9ROR 8.0 · χ² 118 / p 1e-27
6.9 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 10.1no trial data cached
Taste disorder2126.8
17.6–40.9ROR 27.5 · χ² 496 / p 4e-110
26.2 EB05 18.1 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.8 · 70% consumerno trial data cached
Hospice care1846.8
29.6–73.9ROR 47.8 · χ² 760 / p 1e-167
44.6 EB05 29.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.7no trial data cached
Ageusia (loss of taste)1616.3
10.1–26.6ROR 16.7 · χ² 216 / p 4e-49
15.7 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.3no trial data cached
Retinal detachment1644.5
27.4–72.3ROR 45.4 · χ² 637 / p 8e-141
42.4 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 41.3no trial data cached
Metastases to liver1116.0
8.9–28.8ROR 16.2 · χ² 140 / p 1e-32
14.7 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.8no trial data cached
Acute myeloid leukaemia1016.4
8.9–30.4ROR 16.6 · χ² 130 / p 2e-30
14.9 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 15.1no trial data cached
Metastases to bone69.4
4.2–20.8ROR 9.4 · χ² 37 / p 6e-10
6.4 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.7no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Pemigatinib?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Pemigatinib are stomatitis, dry eye, palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome, taste disorder, hospice care, ageusia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Pemigatinib have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Pemigatinib has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Pemigatinib causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.