← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Pexidartinib side effects: what 713 FDA adverse event reports show

Pexidartinib Hydrochloride · 36 reaction terms · 1,245 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Kinase inhibitor

FDA label, Indications wording of the closest related product

Label matched

Pexidartinib Hydrochloride (Turalio)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

713 reports · 16% serious · 11 with death outcome · 61% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

TURALIO is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with symptomatic tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) associated with severe morbidity or functional limitations and not amenable to improvement with surgery. TURALIO is a kinase inhibitor indica.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Pexidartinib is a kinase inhibitor.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

HEPATOTOXICITY TURALIO can cause serious and potentially fatal liver injury, including vanishing bile duct syndrome [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] . Monitor liver tests prior to initiation of TURALIO and at specified intervals during treatment. Withhold and dose reduce or permanently discontinue TURALIO based on severity of hepatotoxicity.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 24 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 2Reporting / coding artifact 12Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 6
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 12 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hair colour changes235560.0
503.6–622.7ROR 834.8 · χ² 128,171 / p <1e-300
525.7 EB05 471.7 · IC025 +7.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36no trial data cached
Product dose omission in error6975.7
60.5–94.8ROR 83.8 · χ² 5,008 / p <1e-300
74.1 EB05 60.5 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 93.4 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Brain fog2652.5
36.0–76.6ROR 54.5 · χ² 1,261 / p 2e-276
50.6 EB05 36.3 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 83.9 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Therapy cessation8146.7
38.0–57.3ROR 52.6 · χ² 3,579 / p <1e-300
46.1 EB05 38.3 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 32.5no trial data cached
Photosensitivity reaction (sun sensitivity)2035.8
23.2–55.1ROR 36.8 · χ² 642 / p 7e-142
34.7 EB05 23.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
♀ 40% (drug 61%) · 70% consumerno trial data cached
Taste disorder2130.8
20.2–47.0ROR 31.8 · χ² 577 / p 9e-128
30.1 EB05 20.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 42.5 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Therapy change1030.5
16.5–56.5ROR 30.9 · χ² 257 / p 4e-58
28.9 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1no trial data cached
Skin discolouration4327.5
20.6–36.8ROR 29.2 · χ² 1,075 / p 5e-236
27.2 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.2 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Product dose omission issue26627.5
25.0–30.2ROR 43.3 · χ² 6,853 / p <1e-300
27.4 EB05 24.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 63.2no trial data cached
Blood iron decreased1127.5
15.3–49.4ROR 27.9 · χ² 255 / p 1e-57
26.2 EB05 15.5 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 73.4no trial data cached
Treatment noncompliance4725.5
19.3–33.6ROR 27.2 · χ² 1,082 / p 1e-237
25.2 EB05 19.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 18.2no trial data cached
Insurance issue1223.8
13.6–41.7ROR 24.2 · χ² 239 / p 3e-54
22.8 EB05 13.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.7no trial data cached
Surgery3618.3
13.3–25.1ROR 19.2 · χ² 572 / p 1e-126
18.1 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 18.9no trial data cached
Thirst1016.5
8.9–30.5ROR 16.7 · χ² 131 / p 2e-30
15.0 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.0no trial data cached
Therapy interrupted3113.2
9.4–18.7ROR 13.8 · χ² 339 / p 5e-76
12.8 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 17.5no trial data cached
Laboratory test abnormal1313.0
7.6–22.2ROR 13.2 · χ² 132 / p 7e-31
11.6 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 25.6no trial data cached
Ageusia (loss of taste)1112.9
7.2–23.3ROR 13.1 · χ² 110 / p 6e-26
11.2 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 18.6no trial data cached
Illness4212.3
9.2–16.5ROR 13.0 · χ² 427 / p 5e-95
12.0 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 31.5 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Adverse drug reaction3511.5
8.3–15.9ROR 12.1 · χ² 327 / p 3e-73
11.0 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 17.1no trial data cached
Intentional dose omission1010.8
5.8–19.9ROR 10.9 · χ² 79 / p 3e-19
8.7 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 15.9no trial data cached
No adverse event569.3
7.2–11.9ROR 10.0 · χ² 409 / p 3e-91
8.9 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.8no trial data cached
Acne166.2
3.8–10.0ROR 6.3 · χ² 65 / p 5e-16
5.3 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.8no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Product dose omission issue26627.5
25.0–30.2ROR 43.3 · χ² 6,853 / p <1e-300
27.4 EB05 24.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 63.2no trial data cached
Hair colour changes235560.0
503.6–622.7ROR 834.8 · χ² 128,171 / p <1e-300
525.7 EB05 471.7 · IC025 +7.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36no trial data cached
Therapy cessation8146.7
38.0–57.3ROR 52.6 · χ² 3,579 / p <1e-300
46.1 EB05 38.3 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 32.5no trial data cached
Product dose omission in error6975.7
60.5–94.8ROR 83.8 · χ² 5,008 / p <1e-300
74.1 EB05 60.5 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 93.4 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
No adverse event569.3
7.2–11.9ROR 10.0 · χ² 409 / p 3e-91
8.9 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.8no trial data cached
Treatment noncompliance4725.5
19.3–33.6ROR 27.2 · χ² 1,082 / p 1e-237
25.2 EB05 19.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 18.2no trial data cached
Skin discolouration4327.5
20.6–36.8ROR 29.2 · χ² 1,075 / p 5e-236
27.2 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.2 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Illness4212.3
9.2–16.5ROR 13.0 · χ² 427 / p 5e-95
12.0 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 31.5 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Surgery3618.3
13.3–25.1ROR 19.2 · χ² 572 / p 1e-126
18.1 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 18.9no trial data cached
Adverse drug reaction3511.5
8.3–15.9ROR 12.1 · χ² 327 / p 3e-73
11.0 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 17.1no trial data cached
Therapy interrupted3113.2
9.4–18.7ROR 13.8 · χ² 339 / p 5e-76
12.8 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 17.5no trial data cached
Brain fog2652.5
36.0–76.6ROR 54.5 · χ² 1,261 / p 2e-276
50.6 EB05 36.3 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 83.9 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Taste disorder2130.8
20.2–47.0ROR 31.8 · χ² 577 / p 9e-128
30.1 EB05 20.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 42.5 · 76% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Pexidartinib?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Pexidartinib are hair colour changes, skin discolouration, eye swelling, swelling face, brain fog, taste disorder. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Pexidartinib have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: HEPATOTOXICITY TURALIO can cause serious and potentially fatal liver injury, including vanishing bile duct syndrome [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] . Monitor liver tests prior to initiation of TURALIO and at specified intervals during treatment. Withhold and dose reduce or permanently discontinue TURALIO based on severity of hepatotoxicity.

Do FAERS signals prove that Pexidartinib causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.