← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Pimecrolimus side effects: what 1,703 FDA adverse event reports show

Pimecrolimus · 65 reaction terms · 1,879 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Calcineurin Inhibitor Immunosuppressant

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

1,703 reports · 32% serious · 22 with death outcome · 65% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Pimecrolimus cream, 1% is indicated as second-line therapy for the short-term and non-continuous chronic treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in non-immunocompromised adults and children 2 years of age and older, who have failed to respond adequately to other topical prescription treatments, or when those treatments are not advisable.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Pimecrolimus cream, 1%, for topical use, contains the compound pimecrolimus, the immunosuppressant 33-epi-chloro-derivative of the macrolactam ascomycin.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

LONG-TERM SAFETY OF TOPICAL CALCINEURIN INHIBITORS HAS NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED Although a causal relationship has not been established, rare cases of malignancy (e.g., skin and lymphoma) have been reported in patients treated with topical calcineurin inhibitors, including pimecrolimus cream, 1% [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ].

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 1Labeled adverse reaction 4Labeled (related wording) 9Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 8Not in label — unassessed 17
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 25 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Sleep disorder due to a general medical condition6650.4
39.8–63.9ROR 52.4 · χ² 3,137 / p <1e-300
49.5 EB05 40.3 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.7no trial data cached
Dermatitis atopic20049.5
43.4–56.4ROR 55.9 · χ² 9,432 / p <1e-300
49.0 EB05 43.6 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=22no trial data cached
Skin fissures4126.8
19.8–36.2ROR 27.4 · χ² 990 / p 1e-217
26.4 EB05 20.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=6no trial data cached
Eczema9723.8
19.6–28.8ROR 25.1 · χ² 2,094 / p <1e-300
23.6 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 21.6no trial data cached
Impaired quality of life2319.7
13.1–29.6ROR 20.0 · χ² 389 / p 6e-87
19.3 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.3 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Skin haemorrhage2017.1
11.0–26.4ROR 17.3 · χ² 287 / p 1e-64
16.6 EB05 11.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=2no trial data cached
Dermatitis2514.9
10.1–21.9ROR 15.1 · χ² 309 / p 1e-69
14.4 EB05 10.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 10.7no trial data cached
Scratch1011.9
6.4–22.1ROR 12.0 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21
9.8 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached
Skin exfoliation7611.3
9.0–14.0ROR 11.7 · χ² 703 / p 4e-155
11.1 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.3no trial data cached
Skin infection1011.0
5.9–20.5ROR 11.1 · χ² 81 / p 9e-20
8.9 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 21.6no trial data cached
Discomfort5310.8
8.3–14.0ROR 11.1 · χ² 461 / p 2e-102
10.4 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.6no trial data cached
Oral herpes1710.8
6.7–17.3ROR 10.9 · χ² 141 / p 8e-33
9.6 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Conjunctivitis1610.7
6.6–17.5ROR 10.8 · χ² 132 / p 1e-30
9.4 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.6no trial data cached
Therapeutic response shortened2610.1
6.9–14.7ROR 10.2 · χ² 203 / p 2e-46
9.3 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.1 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Sleep disorder529.2
7.0–12.0ROR 9.4 · χ² 370 / p 8e-83
8.7 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.5no trial data cached
Dry eye348.6
6.2–12.1ROR 8.8 · χ² 222 / p 1e-50
8.0 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Drug ineffective for unapproved indication388.4
6.1–11.5ROR 8.6 · χ² 241 / p 1e-54
7.8 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.6no trial data cached
Rash macular227.8
5.1–11.8ROR 7.9 · χ² 123 / p 6e-29
6.9 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.1no trial data cached
Ocular hyperaemia297.6
5.3–11.0ROR 7.8 · χ² 161 / p 3e-37
7.0 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.9no trial data cached
Product dose omission in error167.3
4.5–11.9ROR 7.4 · χ² 81 / p 9e-20
6.2 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Product prescribing issue127.3
4.1–12.8ROR 7.3 · χ² 59 / p 9e-15
5.9 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.6no trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication1266.3
5.4–7.5ROR 6.8 · χ² 569 / p 5e-126
6.2 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.2no trial data cached
Therapeutic response decreased316.3
4.5–9.0ROR 6.4 · χ² 134 / p 3e-31
5.8 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.8no trial data cached
Pruritus (itching)1936.3
5.5–7.2ROR 7.0 · χ² 868 / p 4e-191
6.2 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.2no trial data cached
Treatment failure406.0
4.4–8.1ROR 6.1 · χ² 162 / p 2e-37
5.6 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.1no trial data cached
Exposure via skin contact105.4
2.9–10.1ROR 5.5 · χ² 32 / p 8e-9
4.4 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1no trial data cached
Skin discolouration205.4
3.5–8.3ROR 5.4 · χ² 67 / p 2e-16
4.8 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.6no trial data cached
Rash pruritic225.0
3.3–7.6ROR 5.1 · χ² 67 / p 1e-16
4.6 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.7no trial data cached
Psoriatic arthropathy164.9
3.0–8.0ROR 4.9 · χ² 46 / p 6e-12
4.3 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.6no trial data cached
Psoriasis454.2
3.2–5.7ROR 4.3 · χ² 109 / p 9e-26
4.1 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.3no trial data cached
Injection site reaction162.9
1.8–4.7ROR 2.9 · χ² 18 / p 1e-5
2.7 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.6no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Dermatitis atopic20049.5
43.4–56.4ROR 55.9 · χ² 9,432 / p <1e-300
49.0 EB05 43.6 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=22no trial data cached
Pruritus (itching)1936.3
5.5–7.2ROR 7.0 · χ² 868 / p 4e-191
6.2 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.2no trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication1266.3
5.4–7.5ROR 6.8 · χ² 569 / p 5e-126
6.2 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.2no trial data cached
Eczema9723.8
19.6–28.8ROR 25.1 · χ² 2,094 / p <1e-300
23.6 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 21.6no trial data cached
Skin exfoliation7611.3
9.0–14.0ROR 11.7 · χ² 703 / p 4e-155
11.1 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.3no trial data cached
Sleep disorder due to a general medical condition6650.4
39.8–63.9ROR 52.4 · χ² 3,137 / p <1e-300
49.5 EB05 40.3 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.7no trial data cached
Discomfort5310.8
8.3–14.0ROR 11.1 · χ² 461 / p 2e-102
10.4 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.6no trial data cached
Sleep disorder529.2
7.0–12.0ROR 9.4 · χ² 370 / p 8e-83
8.7 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.5no trial data cached
Psoriasis454.2
3.2–5.7ROR 4.3 · χ² 109 / p 9e-26
4.1 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.3no trial data cached
Skin fissures4126.8
19.8–36.2ROR 27.4 · χ² 990 / p 1e-217
26.4 EB05 20.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=6no trial data cached
Treatment failure406.0
4.4–8.1ROR 6.1 · χ² 162 / p 2e-37
5.6 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.1no trial data cached
Drug ineffective for unapproved indication388.4
6.1–11.5ROR 8.6 · χ² 241 / p 1e-54
7.8 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.6no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Pimecrolimus?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Pimecrolimus are dermatitis atopic, pruritus, dry skin, eczema, skin exfoliation, injection site pain. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Pimecrolimus have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: LONG-TERM SAFETY OF TOPICAL CALCINEURIN INHIBITORS HAS NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED Although a causal relationship has not been established, rare cases of malignancy (e.g., skin and lymphoma) have been reported in patients treated with topical calcineurin inhibitors, including pimecrolimus cream, 1% [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ].

Do FAERS signals prove that Pimecrolimus causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.