← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Piperacillin and Tazobactam side effects: what 12,716 FDA adverse event reports show

Piperacillin And Tazobactam · 1,047 reaction terms · 45,616 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

12,716 reports · 97% serious · 2,658 with death outcome · 42% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Piperacillin and Tazobactam for Injection, USP is a combination of piperacillin, a penicillin-class antibacterial and tazobactam, a beta-lactamase inhibitor, indicated for the treatment of: Intra-abdominal infections in adult and pediatric patients 2 m.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Piperacillin and tazobactam for injection, USP is an injectable antibacterial combination product consisting of the semisynthetic antibacterial piperacillin sodium and the beta-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam sodium for intravenous administration. Piperacillin sodium is derived from D(-)-α-aminobenzyl-penicillin.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 4Likely indication confounding 5Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 4Not in label — unassessed 26
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,007 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Pyelonephritis fungal12325.2
175.0–604.3ROR 325.5 · χ² 2,968 / p <1e-300
189.8 EB05 115.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
New onset refractory status epilepticus10171.2
89.2–328.3ROR 171.3 · χ² 1,381 / p <1e-300
120.1 EB05 69.7 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Retinitis viral10150.6
78.8–287.7ROR 150.7 · χ² 1,226 / p 6e-269
109.7 EB05 63.7 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Perinephric abscess12140.4
77.9–253.1ROR 140.5 · χ² 1,403 / p <1e-300
107.7 EB05 65.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=12no trial data cached
Pulmonary interstitial emphysema syndrome11137.6
74.4–254.6ROR 137.7 · χ² 1,252 / p 1e-274
104.5 EB05 62.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Geotrichum infection16134.1
80.6–223.2ROR 134.3 · χ² 1,832 / p <1e-300
108.3 EB05 70.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Gastrointestinal mucormycosis11122.5
66.4–226.1ROR 122.6 · χ² 1,122 / p 2e-246
95.6 EB05 57.0 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Trichosporon infection26115.8
77.8–172.4ROR 116.1 · χ² 2,657 / p <1e-300
100.4 EB05 72.0 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · ♀ 0% (drug 42%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Emphysematous pyelonephritis12114.8
63.9–206.1ROR 114.9 · χ² 1,160 / p 1e-254
92.0 EB05 56.1 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Intra-abdominal pressure increased10112.1
59.1–212.8ROR 112.2 · χ² 929 / p 2e-204
87.9 EB05 51.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=10no trial data cached
Spinal muscular atrophy17111.0
67.9–181.4ROR 111.2 · χ² 1,634 / p <1e-300
93.4 EB05 61.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
Pyroglutamic acidosis22101.3
65.9–155.9ROR 101.5 · χ² 1,964 / p <1e-300
88.4 EB05 61.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Alveolar lung disease11100.5
54.7–184.7ROR 100.6 · χ² 929 / p 3e-204
81.7 EB05 48.7 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Choroiditis2092.7
59.1–145.4ROR 92.8 · χ² 1,630 / p <1e-300
81.1 EB05 55.5 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Acid base balance abnormal1292.0
51.5–164.6ROR 92.1 · χ² 938 / p 2e-206
76.9 EB05 46.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Portal fibrosis1190.3
49.2–165.8ROR 90.4 · χ² 838 / p 1e-184
74.9 EB05 44.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Linear iga disease7780.0
63.6–100.4ROR 80.4 · χ² 5,648 / p <1e-300
74.9 EB05 61.9 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=77 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Positive airway pressure therapy1073.6
39.1–138.6ROR 73.6 · χ² 617 / p 1e-136
62.5 EB05 36.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=10no trial data cached
Antibiotic level above therapeutic1773.1
45.0–118.9ROR 73.2 · χ² 1,089 / p 3e-239
65.1 EB05 43.1 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=17no trial data cached
Clostridium test positive8768.5
55.3–84.8ROR 68.9 · χ² 5,487 / p <1e-300
64.9 EB05 54.2 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=87 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Stoma closure1268.2
38.3–121.5ROR 68.3 · χ² 700 / p 2e-154
59.6 EB05 36.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Rhinocerebral mucormycosis1365.0
37.4–113.2ROR 65.1 · χ² 728 / p 1e-160
57.6 EB05 35.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Pneumococcal sepsis2463.1
42.0–94.8ROR 63.2 · χ² 1,352 / p 3e-296
58.1 EB05 41.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=24 · ♀ 0% (drug 42%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Disseminated mucormycosis1461.7
36.2–105.2ROR 61.8 · χ² 748 / p 5e-165
55.3 EB05 35.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema2860.3
41.4–87.9ROR 60.4 · χ² 1,518 / p <1e-300
56.1 EB05 40.7 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=27 · ♀ 62% (drug 42%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Necrosis ischaemic1659.0
35.8–97.1ROR 59.1 · χ² 825 / p 9e-182
53.5 EB05 34.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=16no trial data cached
Intensive care unit acquired weakness1358.1
33.4–101.0ROR 58.1 · χ² 650 / p 1e-143
52.1 EB05 32.4 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Pneumatosis1349.6
28.6–86.1ROR 49.7 · χ² 555 / p 6e-123
45.2 EB05 28.1 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Systemic candida6947.4
37.3–60.2ROR 47.7 · χ² 3,001 / p <1e-300
45.5 EB05 37.2 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=69 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Enterococcus test positive1846.8
29.3–74.7ROR 46.8 · χ² 740 / p 4e-163
43.5 EB05 29.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=18no trial data cached
Hyperferritinaemia1144.9
24.7–81.8ROR 45.0 · χ² 418 / p 3e-93
40.9 EB05 24.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Motor neurone disease1344.8
25.8–77.7ROR 44.8 · χ² 500 / p 5e-111
41.2 EB05 25.6 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Neutrophilic dermatosis1042.5
22.7–79.5ROR 42.5 · χ² 355 / p 2e-79
38.6 EB05 22.4 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Pseudomonal bacteraemia2040.3
25.8–62.7ROR 40.3 · χ² 709 / p 1e-156
38.0 EB05 26.0 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=20no trial data cached
Gastroduodenal ulcer1040.3
21.5–75.4ROR 40.3 · χ² 336 / p 2e-75
36.8 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Fungaemia3638.8
27.9–54.0ROR 38.9 · χ² 1,259 / p 5e-276
37.3 EB05 28.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,4591.8
1.7–1.9ROR 1.9 · χ² 582 / p 6e-129
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.0 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,0432.0
1.9–2.1ROR 2.1 · χ² 528 / p 3e-117
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.0 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Acute kidney injury (sudden kidney damage)97710.6
10.0–11.3ROR 11.4 · χ² 8,530 / p <1e-300
10.6 EB05 10.0 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.2 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)4907.3
6.7–7.9ROR 7.5 · χ² 2,647 / p <1e-300
7.2 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.4 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug interaction4825.0
4.6–5.5ROR 5.2 · χ² 1,555 / p <1e-300
5.0 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.3 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Pneumonia (lung infection)4632.4
2.2–2.6ROR 2.4 · χ² 368 / p 2e-82
2.4 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 1.4 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)4591.2
1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 12 / p 2e-4
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.2 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Condition aggravated4542.5
2.3–2.7ROR 2.5 · χ² 405 / p 2e-90
2.5 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.2 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Septic shock42516.4
14.9–18.0ROR 16.9 · χ² 6,068 / p <1e-300
16.2 EB05 14.9 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.6 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Hypotension (low blood pressure)4183.4
3.1–3.8ROR 3.5 · χ² 729 / p 8e-161
3.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.4 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Sepsis (blood infection)4106.1
5.5–6.7ROR 6.2 · χ² 1,737 / p <1e-300
6.0 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.6 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)4081.2
1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 12 / p 2e-4
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.0 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms40126.3
23.8–29.0ROR 27.1 · χ² 9,582 / p <1e-300
25.8 EB05 23.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 15.3 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Rash3851.5
1.3–1.6ROR 1.5 · χ² 57 / p 2e-14
1.5 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Piperacillin and Tazobactam?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Piperacillin and Tazobactam are acute kidney injury, pyrexia, thrombocytopenia, pneumonia, diarrhoea, septic shock. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Piperacillin and Tazobactam have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Piperacillin and Tazobactam has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Piperacillin and Tazobactam causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.