← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Polyethylene Glycol-3350 and Electrolytes side effects: what 772 FDA adverse event reports show

Polyethylene Glycol-3350 And Electrolytes · 18 reaction terms · 483 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Osmotic Laxative

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

772 reports · 31% serious · 23 with death outcome · 58% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

PEG-3350 and electrolytes for oral solution, USP is a combination of PEG 3350, an osmotic laxative, and electrolytes indicated for cleansing of the colon in preparation for colonoscopy and barium enema X-ray examination in adults ( 1 ) PEG-3350 and electrolytes for oral solution is indicated for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy and barium enema X-ray examination in adults.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

PEG-3350 and electrolytes for oral solution is a combination of polyethylene glycol 3350, an osmotic laxative, and electrolytes (sodium sulfate, sodium chloride, sodium bicarbonate and potassi.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 14 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Reporting / coding artifact 8Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 4
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 4 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Product dispensing error88109.8
90.1–133.7ROR 123.7 · χ² 9,348 / p <1e-300
106.9 EB05 89.4 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact97% consumerno trial data cached
Product prescribing error3337.7
27.0–52.7ROR 39.3 · χ² 1,143 / p 9e-251
36.9 EB05 27.5 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact97% consumerno trial data cached
No adverse event19930.4
26.9–34.2ROR 40.5 · χ² 5,661 / p <1e-300
30.2 EB05 26.9 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.2 · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Product prescribing issue1823.9
15.1–37.8ROR 24.5 · χ² 373 / p 2e-83
23.3 EB05 15.6 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Product taste abnormal1122.1
12.3–39.8ROR 22.4 · χ² 201 / p 6e-46
21.1 EB05 12.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
End stage renal disease1522.0
13.3–36.4ROR 22.4 · χ² 280 / p 3e-63
21.4 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 40.4no trial data cached
Anhedonia2020.4
13.2–31.5ROR 20.9 · χ² 350 / p 2e-78
20.0 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 41.5 · ♀ 15% (drug 58%)no trial data cached
Economic problem915.8
8.2–30.2ROR 16.0 · χ² 110 / p 4e-26
13.9 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 31.7no trial data cached
Impaired quality of life713.2
6.3–27.5ROR 13.3 · χ² 67 / p 1e-16
10.1 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Product use complaint712.2
5.8–25.5ROR 12.3 · χ² 61 / p 2e-15
9.2 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Circumstance or information capable of leading to medication error118.9
4.9–15.9ROR 9.0 · χ² 69 / p 5e-17
7.1 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Bone density decreased76.0
2.9–12.5ROR 6.0 · χ² 24 / p 4e-7
4.5 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 13.7no trial data cached
Wrong technique in product usage process354.7
3.4–6.5ROR 4.9 · χ² 99 / p 1e-23
4.4 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.5 · 100% consumerno trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
No adverse event19930.4
26.9–34.2ROR 40.5 · χ² 5,661 / p <1e-300
30.2 EB05 26.9 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.2 · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Product dispensing error88109.8
90.1–133.7ROR 123.7 · χ² 9,348 / p <1e-300
106.9 EB05 89.4 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact97% consumerno trial data cached
Wrong technique in product usage process354.7
3.4–6.5ROR 4.9 · χ² 99 / p 1e-23
4.4 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.5 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Product prescribing error3337.7
27.0–52.7ROR 39.3 · χ² 1,143 / p 9e-251
36.9 EB05 27.5 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact97% consumerno trial data cached
Anhedonia2020.4
13.2–31.5ROR 20.9 · χ² 350 / p 2e-78
20.0 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 41.5 · ♀ 15% (drug 58%)no trial data cached
Product prescribing issue1823.9
15.1–37.8ROR 24.5 · χ² 373 / p 2e-83
23.3 EB05 15.6 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
End stage renal disease1522.0
13.3–36.4ROR 22.4 · χ² 280 / p 3e-63
21.4 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 40.4no trial data cached
Circumstance or information capable of leading to medication error118.9
4.9–15.9ROR 9.0 · χ² 69 / p 5e-17
7.1 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Product taste abnormal1122.1
12.3–39.8ROR 22.4 · χ² 201 / p 6e-46
21.1 EB05 12.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Economic problem915.8
8.2–30.2ROR 16.0 · χ² 110 / p 4e-26
13.9 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 31.7no trial data cached
Bone density decreased76.0
2.9–12.5ROR 6.0 · χ² 24 / p 4e-7
4.5 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 13.7no trial data cached
Product use complaint712.2
5.8–25.5ROR 12.3 · χ² 61 / p 2e-15
9.2 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Impaired quality of life713.2
6.3–27.5ROR 13.3 · χ² 67 / p 1e-16
10.1 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Dermatitis atopic52.7
1.1–6.5ROR 2.7 · χ² 4 / p 0.025
2.3 EB05 1.1 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Polyethylene Glycol-3350 and Electrolytes?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Polyethylene Glycol-3350 and Electrolytes are anhedonia, end stage renal disease, circumstance or information capable of leading to medication error, impaired gastric emptying, bone density decreased, impaired quality of life. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Polyethylene Glycol-3350 and Electrolytes have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Polyethylene Glycol-3350 and Electrolytes has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Polyethylene Glycol-3350 and Electrolytes causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.