Pyrimethamine side effects: what 1,262 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Dihydrofolate Reductase Inhibitor Antimalarial
Who reports
1,262 reports · 77% serious · 220 with death outcome · 45% female
Used for
Treatment of Toxoplasmosis : Pyrimethamine tablets are indicated for the treatment of toxoplasmosis when used conjointly with a sulfonamide, since synergism exists with this combination.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 25 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 26 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clostridium difficile colitis | 19 | 29.8 19.1–46.6ROR 30.2 · χ² 500 / p 5e-111 | 29.0 EB05 19.6 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 22.7 | no trial data cached |
| Lymphopenia | 23 | 27.2 18.2–40.8ROR 27.7 · χ² 555 / p 6e-123 | 26.7 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 21.9 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Bone marrow failure | 33 | 26.9 19.2–37.6ROR 27.6 · χ² 795 / p 3e-175 | 26.5 EB05 19.7 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 20.1 · ♀ 67% (drug 45%) · 97% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Pancytopenia (all blood cells low) | 87 | 26.0 21.2–31.8ROR 27.9 · χ² 2,069 / p <1e-300 | 25.8 EB05 21.6 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 19.5 · 93% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia | 11 | 18.3 10.2–33.0ROR 18.5 · χ² 163 / p 1e-37 | 17.2 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 13.7 | no trial data cached |
| Nephropathy | 10 | 17.7 9.6–32.9ROR 17.9 · χ² 142 / p 6e-33 | 16.3 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 14.1 | no trial data cached |
| Drug resistance | 26 | 16.8 11.5–24.7ROR 17.2 · χ² 372 / p 3e-83 | 16.5 EB05 11.7 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 14.1 · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Hepatic cytolysis | 12 | 16.3 9.3–28.7ROR 16.5 · χ² 158 / p 2e-36 | 15.2 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 12.2 | no trial data cached |
| Central nervous system lesion | 13 | 15.6 9.1–26.9ROR 15.8 · χ² 164 / p 8e-38 | 14.6 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 17.1 | no trial data cached |
| Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms | 23 | 15.0 10.0–22.5ROR 15.2 · χ² 286 / p 2e-64 | 14.5 EB05 9.8 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 11.2 · ♀ 73% (drug 45%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Hepatocellular injury | 12 | 14.0 8.0–24.7ROR 14.2 · χ² 133 / p 5e-31 | 12.6 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.5 | no trial data cached |
| Toxic epidermal necrolysis (severe skin peeling reaction) | 12 | 13.2 7.5–23.3ROR 13.4 · χ² 124 / p 5e-29 | 11.7 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 9.9 | no trial data cached |
| Agranulocytosis (severe loss of white cells) | 14 | 12.6 7.5–21.2ROR 12.7 · χ² 138 / p 3e-32 | 11.3 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 9.4 | no trial data cached |
| Cholestasis (bile flow blockage) | 13 | 11.3 6.6–19.5ROR 11.4 · χ² 112 / p 2e-26 | 9.8 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 8.6 | no trial data cached |
| Stevens-johnson syndrome (severe blistering skin reaction) | 14 | 10.5 6.2–17.6ROR 10.6 · χ² 110 / p 4e-26 | 9.0 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 7.9 | no trial data cached |
| Coagulopathy | 10 | 10.0 5.4–18.6ROR 10.1 · χ² 72 / p 9e-18 | 7.9 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 7.8 | no trial data cached |
| Rash papular | 13 | 9.6 5.6–16.5ROR 9.7 · χ² 92 / p 4e-22 | 8.0 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +1.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 8.3 | no trial data cached |
| Neuralgia | 14 | 9.6 5.7–16.2ROR 9.7 · χ² 100 / p 1e-23 | 8.1 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.6 | no trial data cached |
| Leukopenia (low white blood cells) | 27 | 9.0 6.2–13.1ROR 9.2 · χ² 185 / p 3e-42 | 8.2 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 7.0 · ♀ 67% (drug 45%) | no trial data cached |
| Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells)) | 72 | 8.8 7.1–11.1ROR 9.3 · χ² 496 / p 4e-110 | 8.5 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 6.8 · 91% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Pancreatitis (pancreas inflammation) | 24 | 7.5 5.1–11.2ROR 7.7 · χ² 130 / p 2e-30 | 6.8 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 5.7 · ♀ 10% (drug 45%) · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Premature baby | 11 | 6.1 3.4–10.9ROR 6.1 · χ² 42 / p 6e-11 | 4.9 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 4.6 | no trial data cached |
| Visual acuity reduced | 10 | 5.0 2.7–9.2ROR 5.0 · χ² 28 / p 6e-8 | 4.1 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 5.0 | no trial data cached |
| Maternal exposure during pregnancy | 23 | 4.3 2.9–6.5ROR 4.4 · χ² 56 / p 4e-14 | 4.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 3.9 · ♀ 77% (drug 45%) · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Foetal exposure during pregnancy | 18 | 3.7 2.3–5.8ROR 3.7 · χ² 33 / p 5e-9 | 3.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 2.8 | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pancytopenia (all blood cells low) | 87 | 26.0 21.2–31.8ROR 27.9 · χ² 2,069 / p <1e-300 | 25.8 EB05 21.6 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 19.5 · 93% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells)) | 72 | 8.8 7.1–11.1ROR 9.3 · χ² 496 / p 4e-110 | 8.5 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 6.8 · 91% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Bone marrow failure | 33 | 26.9 19.2–37.6ROR 27.6 · χ² 795 / p 3e-175 | 26.5 EB05 19.7 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 20.1 · ♀ 67% (drug 45%) · 97% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Leukopenia (low white blood cells) | 27 | 9.0 6.2–13.1ROR 9.2 · χ² 185 / p 3e-42 | 8.2 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 7.0 · ♀ 67% (drug 45%) | no trial data cached |
| Drug resistance | 26 | 16.8 11.5–24.7ROR 17.2 · χ² 372 / p 3e-83 | 16.5 EB05 11.7 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 14.1 · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Pancreatitis (pancreas inflammation) | 24 | 7.5 5.1–11.2ROR 7.7 · χ² 130 / p 2e-30 | 6.8 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 5.7 · ♀ 10% (drug 45%) · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Maternal exposure during pregnancy | 23 | 4.3 2.9–6.5ROR 4.4 · χ² 56 / p 4e-14 | 4.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 3.9 · ♀ 77% (drug 45%) · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms | 23 | 15.0 10.0–22.5ROR 15.2 · χ² 286 / p 2e-64 | 14.5 EB05 9.8 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 11.2 · ♀ 73% (drug 45%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Lymphopenia | 23 | 27.2 18.2–40.8ROR 27.7 · χ² 555 / p 6e-123 | 26.7 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 21.9 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Clostridium difficile colitis | 19 | 29.8 19.1–46.6ROR 30.2 · χ² 500 / p 5e-111 | 29.0 EB05 19.6 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 22.7 | no trial data cached |
| Foetal exposure during pregnancy | 18 | 3.7 2.3–5.8ROR 3.7 · χ² 33 / p 5e-9 | 3.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 2.8 | no trial data cached |
| Neuralgia | 14 | 9.6 5.7–16.2ROR 9.7 · χ² 100 / p 1e-23 | 8.1 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.6 | no trial data cached |
| Stevens-johnson syndrome (severe blistering skin reaction) | 14 | 10.5 6.2–17.6ROR 10.6 · χ² 110 / p 4e-26 | 9.0 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 7.9 | no trial data cached |
| Agranulocytosis (severe loss of white cells) | 14 | 12.6 7.5–21.2ROR 12.7 · χ² 138 / p 3e-32 | 11.3 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 9.4 | no trial data cached |
| Rash papular | 13 | 9.6 5.6–16.5ROR 9.7 · χ² 92 / p 4e-22 | 8.0 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +1.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 8.3 | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Lymphopenia — n=23, PRR 27.2
- Bone marrow failure — n=33, PRR 26.9
- Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms — n=23, PRR 15.0
- Pancreatitis — n=24, PRR 7.5
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Pyrimethamine?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Pyrimethamine are pancytopenia, neutropenia, bone marrow failure, leukopenia, pancreatitis, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Pyrimethamine have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Pyrimethamine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Pyrimethamine causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 2c57a992-619b-40ce-9395-f12ac47a2c67, effective 20210819; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"PYRIMETHAMINE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 51 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.