← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Ritonavir 100 side effects: what 14,851 FDA adverse event reports show

Ritonavir 100 Mg · 1,074 reaction terms · 48,538 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Cytochrome P450 3A Inhibitor, Protease Inhibitor

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) of the closest related product

Label matched

Ritonavir 100 Mg (Ritonavir Film Coated)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

14,851 reports · 92% serious · 1,446 with death outcome · 39% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Ritonavir tablets are indicated in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Ritonavir tablets are HIV protease inhibitor indicated in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. ( 1 ).

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Ritonavir is an inhibitor of HIV protease with activity against the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Ritonavir is chemically designated as 2,4,7,12-Tetraazatridecan-13-oic acid, 10-hydroxy-.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS LEADING TO POTENTIALLY SERIOUS AND/OR LIFE THREATENING REACTIONS Co-administration of ritonavir with several classes of drugs including sedative hypnotics, antiarrhythmics, or ergot alkaloid pr.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 1Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 2Lab value / disease marker 5Not in label — unassessed 29
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,034 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Progressive external ophthalmoplegia1045,791.8
3,744.0–8,959.6ROR 5,832.6 · χ² 115,574 / p <1e-300
929.5 EB05 789.0 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=104 · ♀ 0% (drug 39%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Ultrasound antenatal screen541,879.6
1,249.2–2,828.1ROR 1,886.4 · χ² 42,348 / p <1e-300
622.6 EB05 495.3 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=54 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Glucocorticoids increased111,701.7
705.2–4,105.8ROR 1,702.9 · χ² 7,665 / p <1e-300
328.4 EB05 195.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Cd4/cd8 ratio decreased961,272.9
965.6–1,678.0ROR 1,281.2 · χ² 63,073 / p <1e-300
587.1 EB05 495.0 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=96no trial data cached
Blood hiv rna15580.1
317.7–1,059.3ROR 580.7 · χ² 5,719 / p <1e-300
269.3 EB05 173.2 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Csf hiv escape syndrome39548.5
378.8–794.2ROR 549.9 · χ² 14,899 / p <1e-300
329.9 EB05 251.8 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Aids encephalopathy15485.7
269.9–874.0ROR 486.2 · χ² 5,025 / p <1e-300
247.1 EB05 159.0 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Ergot poisoning21281.1
175.9–449.2ROR 281.5 · χ² 4,647 / p <1e-300
193.2 EB05 133.3 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Scrotal cyst13251.4
139.3–453.7ROR 251.6 · χ² 2,538 / p <1e-300
162.7 EB05 101.2 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Mitochondrial toxicity118236.7
194.9–287.6ROR 238.6 · χ² 23,473 / p <1e-300
196.1 EB05 168.1 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=118 · ♀ 5% (drug 39%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Cd4 lymphocytes abnormal29225.6
152.4–333.8ROR 226.0 · χ² 5,388 / p <1e-300
172.4 EB05 125.9 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=29no trial data cached
Lipodystrophy acquired263198.7
174.8–225.9ROR 202.2 · χ² 45,100 / p <1e-300
171.8 EB05 155.1 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=263 · ♀ 14% (drug 39%)no trial data cached
Alpha 1 foetoprotein abnormal12189.9
103.9–347.0ROR 190.0 · χ² 1,821 / p <1e-300
132.5 EB05 80.8 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=10no trial data cached
Ectopic kidney11189.1
100.7–354.9ROR 189.2 · χ² 1,650 / p <1e-300
129.7 EB05 77.3 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Hiv-associated neurocognitive disorder13184.7
103.6–329.3ROR 184.8 · χ² 1,938 / p <1e-300
132.0 EB05 82.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Retinoblastoma12174.0
95.5–317.1ROR 174.2 · χ² 1,684 / p <1e-300
124.6 EB05 76.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Cushing's syndrome77173.2
136.7–219.4ROR 174.1 · χ² 11,571 / p <1e-300
148.5 EB05 122.7 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=76no trial data cached
Immune reconstitution syndrome138166.6
139.8–198.7ROR 168.2 · χ² 20,145 / p <1e-300
146.0 EB05 126.6 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious n=136no trial data cached
Trisomy 1840164.3
118.4–227.9ROR 164.7 · χ² 5,661 / p <1e-300
137.5 EB05 105.3 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=40 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Chordee14157.2
90.5–273.1ROR 157.3 · χ² 1,814 / p <1e-300
118.9 EB05 75.2 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Adrenal suppression82152.0
121.1–190.8ROR 152.9 · χ² 10,956 / p <1e-300
133.0 EB05 110.5 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=81 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Ventricular hypoplasia24150.5
98.8–229.3ROR 150.8 · χ² 3,083 / p <1e-300
122.9 EB05 86.9 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24no trial data cached
Hypercorticoidism10145.0
75.6–278.1ROR 145.1 · χ² 1,168 / p 3e-256
105.6 EB05 61.3 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Teratogenicity28143.8
97.5–212.2ROR 144.1 · χ² 3,472 / p <1e-300
120.0 EB05 87.1 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Cd4 lymphocytes decreased186133.1
114.6–154.6ROR 134.8 · χ² 22,146 / p <1e-300
120.1 EB05 106.3 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=181no trial data cached
Genitalia external ambiguous15132.2
77.9–224.4ROR 132.3 · χ² 1,666 / p <1e-300
105.0 EB05 67.6 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Congenital naevus11123.5
66.7–228.8ROR 123.6 · χ² 1,118 / p 2e-245
95.3 EB05 56.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Psychiatric decompensation151118.4
100.4–139.7ROR 119.6 · χ² 16,099 / p <1e-300
107.8 EB05 94.1 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=151 · ♀ 2% (drug 39%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Blood hiv rna increased138117.7
99.0–140.0ROR 118.8 · χ² 14,620 / p <1e-300
107.1 EB05 92.9 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=136 · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Hiv viraemia16117.2
70.4–195.2ROR 117.4 · χ² 1,595 / p <1e-300
96.1 EB05 62.7 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Hydrops foetalis4098.7
71.7–136.0ROR 99.0 · χ² 3,523 / p <1e-300
88.5 EB05 67.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=40 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Nephroangiosclerosis1095.4
50.3–180.9ROR 95.4 · χ² 788 / p 1e-173
76.7 EB05 44.5 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Viral mutation identified23294.1
82.5–107.4ROR 95.6 · χ² 19,936 / p <1e-300
87.6 EB05 78.5 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=232 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Laryngomalacia2193.4
60.1–145.3ROR 93.5 · χ² 1,714 / p <1e-300
81.3 EB05 56.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · ♀ 0% (drug 39%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Renal tubular dysfunction3491.6
64.7–129.5ROR 91.8 · χ² 2,773 / p <1e-300
82.1 EB05 61.5 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Renal dysplasia2389.9
59.0–137.1ROR 90.1 · χ² 1,818 / p <1e-300
79.2 EB05 55.6 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Foetal chromosome abnormality1088.7
46.8–168.0ROR 88.7 · χ² 735 / p 4e-162
72.4 EB05 42.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Ultrasound antenatal screen abnormal1387.4
49.9–153.1ROR 87.5 · χ² 965 / p 3e-212
73.8 EB05 45.9 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug interaction2,04618.4
17.7–19.2ROR 21.2 · χ² 33,529 / p <1e-300
18.2 EB05 17.6 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.4 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Foetal exposure during pregnancy1,30523.0
21.9–24.3ROR 25.2 · χ² 27,145 / p <1e-300
22.7 EB05 21.7 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 14.0no trial data cached
Maternal exposure during pregnancy70211.3
10.5–12.2ROR 11.8 · χ² 6,569 / p <1e-300
11.2 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.7 · ♀ 99% (drug 39%)no trial data cached
Exposure during pregnancy64614.8
13.7–16.0ROR 15.4 · χ² 8,243 / p <1e-300
14.7 EB05 13.7 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.8 · ♀ 98% (drug 39%)no trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)5620.9
0.8–1.0ROR 0.9 · χ² 5 / p 0.016
0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.0 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug resistance55531.2
28.7–33.8ROR 32.3 · χ² 15,840 / p <1e-300
30.5 EB05 28.4 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 20.8no trial data cached
Nausea5160.9
0.8–1.0ROR 0.9 · χ² 3 / p 0.034
0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.0no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)5111.1
1.0–1.2ROR 1.1 · χ² 7 / p 0.004
1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 +0.0Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.0no trial data cached
Premature baby45621.6
19.8–23.7ROR 22.3 · χ² 8,831 / p <1e-300
21.3 EB05 19.7 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.0no trial data cached
Toxicity to various agents4513.8
3.5–4.2ROR 3.9 · χ² 933 / p 3e-205
3.8 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.4 · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Abortion spontaneous41514.7
13.4–16.2ROR 15.1 · χ² 5,242 / p <1e-300
14.5 EB05 13.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.2 · ♀ 98% (drug 39%)no trial data cached
Vomiting4081.2
1.1–1.4ROR 1.2 · χ² 18 / p 1e-5
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.1no trial data cached
Anaemia (low red blood cells)4013.0
2.7–3.3ROR 3.0 · χ² 526 / p 1e-116
3.0 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.0no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) ↔ COVID-19 recurrence ("Paxlovid rebound").

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Ritonavir 100?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Ritonavir 100 are virologic failure, nausea, diarrhoea, acute kidney injury, premature baby, toxicity to various agents. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Ritonavir 100 have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS LEADING TO POTENTIALLY SERIOUS AND/OR LIFE THREATENING REACTIONS Co-administration of ritonavir with several classes of drugs including sedative hypnotics, antiarrhythmics, or ergot alkaloid pr.

Do FAERS signals prove that Ritonavir 100 causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.