← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Rolapitant side effects: what 538 FDA adverse event reports show

Rolapitant · Varubi · 6 reaction terms · 102 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Substance p/neurokinin 1 (nk1) receptor antagonist

FDA label, Indications wording

Brand names

Varubi

openFDA label

Who reports

538 reports · 78% serious · 163 with death outcome · 57% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

VARUBI ® is indicated in combination with other antiemetic agents in adults for the prevention of delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of emetogenic cancer chemotherapy, including, but not limited to, highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

VARUBI contains rolapitant, a substance P/neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor antagonist. Rolapitant hydrochloride is chemically described as (5S,8S)-8- { [(1R)-1-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]ethoxy]methyl]}-8-phenyl-1,7-diazaspiro[4.5]decan-2-one hydrochloride.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 4 strongest signals

Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 3
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 2 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Infusion related reaction (reaction during infusion)4023.6
17.5–31.8ROR 25.4 · χ² 846 / p 3e-186
23.4 EB05 17.9 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.5 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Plasma cell myeloma1616.0
9.8–25.9ROR 16.4 · χ² 210 / p 7e-48
15.2 EB05 9.4 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.6no trial data cached
Blood count abnormal615.2
6.9–33.7ROR 15.4 · χ² 66 / p 2e-16
11.7 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 15.8no trial data cached
Flushing3212.2
8.7–17.1ROR 12.9 · χ² 320 / p 8e-72
11.8 EB05 8.5 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 21.1 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Infusion related reaction (reaction during infusion)4023.6
17.5–31.8ROR 25.4 · χ² 846 / p 3e-186
23.4 EB05 17.9 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.5 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Flushing3212.2
8.7–17.1ROR 12.9 · χ² 320 / p 8e-72
11.8 EB05 8.5 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 21.1 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Plasma cell myeloma1616.0
9.8–25.9ROR 16.4 · χ² 210 / p 7e-48
15.2 EB05 9.4 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.6no trial data cached
Blood count abnormal615.2
6.9–33.7ROR 15.4 · χ² 66 / p 2e-16
11.7 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 15.8no trial data cached
Product adhesion issue44.4
1.7–11.7ROR 4.4 · χ² 7 / p 0.003
3.2 EB05 1.4 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Hospice care415.8
6.0–42.0ROR 15.9 · χ² 42 / p 5e-11
10.0 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Rolapitant?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Rolapitant are infusion related reaction, flushing, plasma cell myeloma, blood count abnormal, hospice care. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Rolapitant have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Rolapitant has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Rolapitant causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.