← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Romiplostim side effects: what 14,966 FDA adverse event reports show

Romiplostim · Nplate · 1,021 reaction terms · 40,514 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Brand names

Nplate

openFDA label

Who reports

14,966 reports · 77% serious · 2,626 with death outcome · 54% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Nplate is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist indicated for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in: Adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy. ( 1.1 ) Pediatric patients 1 year of age and older with ITP for at least 6 months who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Romiplostim is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA). Romiplostim, a member of the TPO mimetic class, is an Fc-peptide fusion protein (peptibody). The peptibody molecule contains two iden.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 4Likely indication confounding 10Lab value / disease marker 3Not in label — unassessed 22
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 981 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Biopsy bone marrow abnormal90342.5
272.1–431.2ROR 344.6 · χ² 24,285 / p <1e-300
259.5 EB05 217.6 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=88no trial data cached
Mucocutaneous haemorrhage24285.8
184.2–443.5ROR 286.3 · χ² 5,410 / p <1e-300
199.5 EB05 141.1 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Platelet count abnormal958265.1
247.8–283.5ROR 283.1 · χ² 211,284 / p <1e-300
221.6 EB05 210.0 · IC025 +7.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=639no trial data cached
Splenectomy137187.4
156.9–223.8ROR 189.1 · χ² 22,202 / p <1e-300
161.4 EB05 140.0 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=136no trial data cached
Megakaryocytes increased14174.2
100.0–303.7ROR 174.4 · χ² 1,990 / p <1e-300
128.2 EB05 81.2 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Evans syndrome47151.7
112.3–204.9ROR 152.2 · χ² 6,205 / p <1e-300
129.7 EB05 101.5 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47no trial data cached
Thrombocytosis328138.3
123.6–154.8ROR 141.4 · χ² 40,527 / p <1e-300
124.9 EB05 114.0 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=323no trial data cached
Myeloproliferative disorder1484.8
49.5–145.5ROR 84.9 · χ² 1,015 / p 5e-223
72.4 EB05 45.8 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Anti-platelet antibody positive1084.8
44.8–160.5ROR 84.8 · χ² 703 / p 4e-155
69.7 EB05 40.5 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=10no trial data cached
Cellulitis gangrenous1182.1
44.7–150.9ROR 82.2 · χ² 757 / p 5e-167
68.7 EB05 41.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura8578.4
63.1–97.5ROR 78.9 · χ² 6,077 / p <1e-300
73.1 EB05 61.0 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=85 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Myelofibrosis15676.1
64.8–89.3ROR 76.9 · χ² 10,884 / p <1e-300
71.5 EB05 62.6 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=154no trial data cached
Thrombocytopenia neonatal2070.7
45.1–110.7ROR 70.8 · χ² 1,241 / p 3e-272
63.4 EB05 43.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=20no trial data cached
Immune thrombocytopenia20366.6
57.9–76.6ROR 67.5 · χ² 12,447 / p <1e-300
63.2 EB05 56.2 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=202 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Neutralising antibodies positive1864.4
40.2–103.3ROR 64.5 · χ² 1,014 / p 8e-223
58.0 EB05 38.8 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=17no trial data cached
Mucosal haemorrhage4455.6
41.1–75.1ROR 55.7 · χ² 2,214 / p <1e-300
52.3 EB05 40.6 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=44 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Lymphadenitis9154.8
44.5–67.5ROR 55.1 · χ² 4,570 / p <1e-300
52.2 EB05 43.8 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=91 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%) · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Marrow hyperplasia2552.8
35.4–78.7ROR 52.9 · χ² 1,175 / p 1e-257
49.1 EB05 35.0 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Platelet count2050.0
32.0–78.0ROR 50.0 · χ² 879 / p 1e-193
46.3 EB05 31.6 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=8no trial data cached
Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia2145.6
29.5–70.4ROR 45.7 · χ² 844 / p 6e-186
42.6 EB05 29.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21no trial data cached
Platelet count increased39844.0
39.9–48.6ROR 45.2 · χ² 16,177 / p <1e-300
42.6 EB05 39.2 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 33.1no trial data cached
Embolism arterial3339.5
28.0–55.8ROR 39.6 · χ² 1,167 / p 5e-256
37.7 EB05 28.1 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Blast cells present1236.0
20.3–63.8ROR 36.0 · χ² 364 / p 2e-81
33.4 EB05 20.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=12no trial data cached
Petechiae25334.9
30.8–39.5ROR 35.5 · χ² 8,098 / p <1e-300
34.0 EB05 30.6 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 27.8no trial data cached
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis1933.2
21.1–52.4ROR 33.3 · χ² 549 / p 1e-121
31.5 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial data cached
Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria1031.1
16.6–58.2ROR 31.1 · χ² 256 / p 5e-58
28.9 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Immune thrombocytopenic purpura6130.4
23.6–39.2ROR 30.5 · χ² 1,669 / p <1e-300
29.5 EB05 23.8 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=60no trial data cached
Monocytosis1330.0
17.3–52.0ROR 30.1 · χ² 329 / p 7e-74
28.3 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Antiphospholipid syndrome3329.5
20.9–41.6ROR 29.6 · χ² 862 / p 1e-189
28.5 EB05 21.2 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33no trial data cached
Platelet disorder5128.8
21.8–38.0ROR 28.9 · χ² 1,313 / p 1e-287
28.0 EB05 22.1 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=29no trial data cached
Haematological malignancy5226.2
19.9–34.4ROR 26.2 · χ² 1,211 / p 2e-265
25.5 EB05 20.2 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=51 · ♀ 26% (drug 54%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Non-hodgkin's lymphoma2425.7
17.2–38.5ROR 25.8 · χ² 536 / p 8e-119
24.8 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Myelodysplastic syndrome24624.2
21.4–27.4ROR 24.6 · χ² 5,360 / p <1e-300
23.8 EB05 21.4 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 18.0 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Cerebral venous thrombosis3023.4
16.3–33.6ROR 23.5 · χ² 611 / p 3e-135
22.7 EB05 16.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30 · ♀ 81% (drug 54%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Platelet count decreased1,74323.3
22.3–24.4ROR 26.2 · χ² 36,737 / p <1e-300
22.9 EB05 22.0 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 17.0no trial data cached
Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia7522.4
17.8–28.1ROR 22.5 · χ² 1,486 / p <1e-300
21.9 EB05 18.1 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=75 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,7501.9
1.8–1.9ROR 2.0 · χ² 745 / p 3e-164
1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.6 · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Platelet count decreased1,74323.3
22.3–24.4ROR 26.2 · χ² 36,737 / p <1e-300
22.9 EB05 22.0 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 17.0no trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,2482.0
1.9–2.1ROR 2.1 · χ² 665 / p 7e-147
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.8no trial data cached
Death1,0051.6
1.5–1.7ROR 1.7 · χ² 258 / p 3e-58
1.6 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 1.2no trial data cached
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)1,00412.7
12.0–13.5ROR 13.6 · χ² 10,789 / p <1e-300
12.6 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 9.7no trial data cached
Platelet count abnormal958265.1
247.8–283.5ROR 283.1 · χ² 211,284 / p <1e-300
221.6 EB05 210.0 · IC025 +7.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=639no trial data cached
Therapeutic response decreased94222.2
20.9–23.6ROR 23.6 · χ² 18,819 / p <1e-300
21.9 EB05 20.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 40.0 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Headache6051.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · χ² 57 / p 2e-14
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.3no trial data cached
Fatigue (tiredness)4710.8
0.8–0.9ROR 0.8 · χ² 13 / p 2e-4
0.8 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.4
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 0.8no trial data cached
Platelet count increased39844.0
39.9–48.6ROR 45.2 · χ² 16,177 / p <1e-300
42.6 EB05 39.2 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 33.1no trial data cached
Hospitalisation3883.6
3.2–3.9ROR 3.6 · χ² 720 / p 7e-159
3.6 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.7no trial data cached
Arthralgia (joint pain)3561.2
1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 12 / p 2e-4
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.0no trial data cached
Nausea3450.6
0.6–0.7ROR 0.6 · χ² 87 / p 4e-21
0.6 EB05 0.6 · IC025 -0.9
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.7no trial data cached
Product storage error3455.6
5.0–6.2ROR 5.7 · χ² 1,300 / p 4e-285
5.5 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.7no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Romiplostim?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Romiplostim are platelet count decreased, thrombocytopenia, platelet count abnormal, headache, fatigue, platelet count increased. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Romiplostim have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Romiplostim has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Romiplostim causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.