← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Ropeginterferon Alfa-2B side effects: what 1,774 FDA adverse event reports show

Ropeginterferon Alfa-2B · Besremi, Besremi Pen · 65 reaction terms · 1,774 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Interferon alfa-2b

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Brand names

Besremi, Besremi Pen

openFDA label

Who reports

1,774 reports · 22% serious · 29 with death outcome · 60% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

BESREMi is an interferon alfa-2b indicated for: • The treatment of adults with essential thrombocythemia. ( 1.1 ) • The treatment of adults with polycythemia vera. ( 1.2 ) 1.1 Essential Thrombocythemia BESREMi is indicated for the treatment of adults with essential thrombocythemia. 1.2 Polycythemia Vera BESREMi is indicated for the treatment of adults with polycythemia vera.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft, an interferon alfa-2b, is an N-terminal monopegylated covalent conjugate of proline interferon alfa-2b, produced in Escherichia coli cells by recombinant DNA technology, with a methoxy polyethylene glycol (mPEG) moiety.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

RISK OF SERIOUS DISORDERS Risk of Serious Disorders: Interferon alfa products may cause or aggravate fatal or life-threatening neuropsychiatric, autoimmune, ischemic, and infectious disorders. Patients should be monitored closely with periodic clinical and laboratory evaluations.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 2Labeled adverse reaction 7Labeled (related wording) 4Reporting / coding artifact 10Lab value / disease marker 6Not in label — unassessed 11
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 25 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Platelet count increased8981.0
66.1–99.2ROR 85.2 · χ² 6,906 / p <1e-300
79.1 EB05 66.2 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 47.2 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Blood iron decreased2525.1
17.0–37.0ROR 25.4 · χ² 553 / p 1e-122
24.6 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 21.6 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Brain fog2923.5
16.4–33.7ROR 23.9 · χ² 602 / p 3e-133
23.2 EB05 16.9 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.6 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Laboratory test abnormal5220.9
16.0–27.3ROR 21.5 · χ² 963 / p 9e-212
20.7 EB05 16.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 17.6 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Haematocrit decreased3118.4
12.9–26.0ROR 18.7 · χ² 491 / p 4e-109
18.1 EB05 13.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 10.6 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Influenza like illness (flu-like illness)10915.6
13.0–18.7ROR 16.5 · χ² 1,478 / p <1e-300
15.5 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.4 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Blood test abnormal1815.2
9.6–24.0ROR 15.3 · χ² 224 / p 6e-51
14.5 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.8no trial data cached
Splenomegaly1515.1
9.1–25.1ROR 15.3 · χ² 184 / p 3e-42
14.3 EB05 8.5 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.0no trial data cached
Product availability issue2312.1
8.1–18.2ROR 12.3 · χ² 224 / p 7e-51
11.4 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact91% consumerno trial data cached
Needle issue2811.6
8.0–16.7ROR 11.7 · χ² 260 / p 9e-59
11.0 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached
Injection site irritation1211.2
6.4–19.7ROR 11.3 · χ² 102 / p 3e-24
9.5 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=2no trial data cached
Injection site discolouration1110.5
5.8–18.9ROR 10.5 · χ² 85 / p 1e-20
8.6 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached
Bone pain5110.3
7.8–13.5ROR 10.6 · χ² 419 / p 2e-93
9.9 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.6 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Hepatic enzyme increased539.2
7.1–12.0ROR 9.5 · χ² 381 / p 4e-85
8.8 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 6.6 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Emotional disorder249.1
6.1–13.6ROR 9.3 · χ² 166 / p 3e-38
8.3 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.4 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Red blood cell count decreased229.1
6.0–13.8ROR 9.2 · χ² 150 / p 8e-35
8.1 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 8.6 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Insurance issue118.7
4.9–15.8ROR 8.8 · χ² 68 / p 8e-17
7.0 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Blood triglycerides increased138.7
5.0–14.9ROR 8.7 · χ² 81 / p 1e-19
7.1 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
–no trial data cached
White blood cell count increased288.6
5.9–12.4ROR 8.7 · χ² 180 / p 2e-41
7.8 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 9.8 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Drug effect less than expected108.4
4.5–15.5ROR 8.4 · χ² 58 / p 1e-14
6.5 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1no trial data cached
Night sweats228.1
5.3–12.2ROR 8.2 · χ² 129 / p 3e-30
7.2 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.3 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Blood potassium increased118.0
4.4–14.4ROR 8.1 · χ² 61 / p 3e-15
6.4 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 7.5no trial data cached
Inappropriate schedule of product administration1067.1
5.9–8.5ROR 7.5 · χ² 552 / p 2e-122
6.9 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.0 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Thirst106.6
3.6–12.3ROR 6.7 · χ² 42 / p 4e-11
5.2 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.2no trial data cached
Device malfunction376.5
4.7–8.9ROR 6.6 · χ² 167 / p 1e-38
6.1 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Dry eye266.3
4.3–9.3ROR 6.4 · χ² 112 / p 2e-26
5.8 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.0 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Exposure via skin contact126.3
3.6–11.0ROR 6.3 · χ² 48 / p 2e-12
5.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
White blood cell count decreased566.1
4.7–7.9ROR 6.3 · χ² 235 / p 3e-53
5.8 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.7 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Depressed mood276.1
4.2–8.8ROR 6.1 · χ² 109 / p 7e-26
5.5 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.6 · 70% consumerno trial data cached
Anger175.9
3.7–9.5ROR 6.0 · χ² 65 / p 5e-16
5.2 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.0no trial data cached
Product dose omission in error135.7
3.3–9.8ROR 5.8 · χ² 46 / p 6e-12
4.8 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.2no trial data cached
Pruritus (itching)1715.3
4.6–6.2ROR 5.8 · χ² 610 / p 5e-135
5.3 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.5 · 75% consumerno trial data cached
Irritability275.3
3.6–7.7ROR 5.4 · χ² 90 / p 1e-21
4.9 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Product dose omission issue1134.7
3.9–5.6ROR 4.9 · χ² 328 / p 1e-73
4.6 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.5 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Injection site bruising314.6
3.3–6.6ROR 4.7 · χ² 85 / p 1e-20
4.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.0 · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Intentional dose omission104.3
2.3–8.0ROR 4.3 · χ² 22 / p 1e-6
3.7 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.4no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Pruritus (itching)1715.3
4.6–6.2ROR 5.8 · χ² 610 / p 5e-135
5.3 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.5 · 75% consumerno trial data cached
Product dose omission issue1134.7
3.9–5.6ROR 4.9 · χ² 328 / p 1e-73
4.6 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.5 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Influenza like illness (flu-like illness)10915.6
13.0–18.7ROR 16.5 · χ² 1,478 / p <1e-300
15.5 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.4 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Inappropriate schedule of product administration1067.1
5.9–8.5ROR 7.5 · χ² 552 / p 2e-122
6.9 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.0 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Platelet count increased8981.0
66.1–99.2ROR 85.2 · χ² 6,906 / p <1e-300
79.1 EB05 66.2 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 47.2 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Incorrect dose administered703.7
2.9–4.6ROR 3.8 · χ² 135 / p 2e-31
3.6 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 14.6no trial data cached
White blood cell count decreased566.1
4.7–7.9ROR 6.3 · χ² 235 / p 3e-53
5.8 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.7 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Hepatic enzyme increased539.2
7.1–12.0ROR 9.5 · χ² 381 / p 4e-85
8.8 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 6.6 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Laboratory test abnormal5220.9
16.0–27.3ROR 21.5 · χ² 963 / p 9e-212
20.7 EB05 16.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 17.6 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Bone pain5110.3
7.8–13.5ROR 10.6 · χ² 419 / p 2e-93
9.9 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.6 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Device malfunction376.5
4.7–8.9ROR 6.6 · χ² 167 / p 1e-38
6.1 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Injection site bruising314.6
3.3–6.6ROR 4.7 · χ² 85 / p 1e-20
4.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.0 · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Haematocrit decreased3118.4
12.9–26.0ROR 18.7 · χ² 491 / p 4e-109
18.1 EB05 13.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 10.6 · 77% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (darbepoetin alfa) ↔ Mortality / cardiovascular risk.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Ropeginterferon Alfa-2B?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Ropeginterferon Alfa-2B are pruritus, influenza like illness, platelet count increased, injection site erythema, platelet count decreased, white blood cell count decreased. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Ropeginterferon Alfa-2B have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: RISK OF SERIOUS DISORDERS Risk of Serious Disorders: Interferon alfa products may cause or aggravate fatal or life-threatening neuropsychiatric, autoimmune, ischemic, and infectious disorders. Patients should be monitored closely with periodic clinical and laboratory evaluations.

Do FAERS signals prove that Ropeginterferon Alfa-2B causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.