← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Rydapt side effects: what 1,943 FDA adverse event reports show

Rydapt · 36 reaction terms · 1,237 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Kinase Inhibitor

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

1,943 reports · 73% serious · 465 with death outcome · 47% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

RYDAPT is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of adult patients with: Newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that is FLT3 mutation-positive as detected by an FDA-approved test, in combination with standard cytarabine and daunorubicin induction and cytarabine consolidation. ( 1.1 ) Limitations of Use: RYDAPT is not indicated as a single-agent induction therapy for the treatment of patients with AML.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Midostaurin is a kinase inhibitor for oral use.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 28 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 5Labeled (related wording) 4Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 4Lab value / disease marker 1Outcome field, not a reaction 1Not in label — unassessed 11
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 8 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Bone marrow failure7640.2
32.3–50.2ROR 41.8 · χ² 2,861 / p <1e-300
39.7 EB05 32.8 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 31.9 · ♀ 13% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Leukaemia2731.0
21.3–45.1ROR 31.4 · χ² 752 / p 8e-166
30.3 EB05 21.9 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 22.8 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Cytopenia2825.3
17.5–36.6ROR 25.7 · χ² 629 / p 3e-139
24.9 EB05 18.1 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 20.0no trial data cached
Acute myeloid leukaemia3020.8
14.6–29.7ROR 21.1 · χ² 546 / p 5e-121
20.5 EB05 15.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 16.0no trial data cached
Lymphadenopathy6018.3
14.3–23.5ROR 18.9 · χ² 964 / p 6e-212
18.2 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.7 · ♀ 2% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Myocarditis1716.2
10.1–26.1ROR 16.4 · χ² 228 / p 1e-51
15.6 EB05 9.8 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.9no trial data cached
Hyperbilirubinaemia1515.7
9.5–26.1ROR 15.8 · χ² 192 / p 5e-44
14.9 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.7no trial data cached
Myelosuppression4815.2
11.5–20.2ROR 15.6 · χ² 625 / p 3e-138
15.1 EB05 11.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.1 · ♀ 4% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome1314.8
8.6–25.4ROR 14.8 · χ² 153 / p 2e-35
13.6 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.7no trial data cached
Ejection fraction decreased2114.6
9.5–22.3ROR 14.7 · χ² 252 / p 5e-57
14.0 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 12.1 · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Febrile neutropenia7812.7
10.2–15.8ROR 13.2 · χ² 833 / p 2e-183
12.6 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 10.1 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Hepatic cytolysis1412.4
7.3–20.9ROR 12.5 · χ² 135 / p 2e-31
11.0 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.8no trial data cached
Bacteraemia1110.1
5.6–18.2ROR 10.1 · χ² 81 / p 1e-19
8.2 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.1no trial data cached
Product use complaint128.4
4.8–14.7ROR 8.4 · χ² 71 / p 2e-17
6.8 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=2no trial data cached
Drug intolerance738.2
6.5–10.3ROR 8.5 · χ² 455 / p 2e-101
7.9 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.0 · ♀ 17% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Electrocardiogram qt prolonged206.0
3.9–9.3ROR 6.1 · χ² 78 / p 4e-19
5.3 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.8no trial data cached
Septic shock246.0
4.0–8.9ROR 6.1 · χ² 95 / p 9e-23
5.4 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached
Hepatotoxicity (liver damage)125.8
3.3–10.3ROR 5.9 · χ² 43 / p 2e-11
4.9 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.7no trial data cached
Pericardial effusion125.6
3.2–9.9ROR 5.7 · χ² 41 / p 7e-11
4.7 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.5no trial data cached
Malignant neoplasm progression535.6
4.3–7.3ROR 5.7 · χ² 197 / p 4e-45
5.4 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.5no trial data cached
Pneumonitis124.8
2.7–8.4ROR 4.8 · χ² 32 / p 6e-9
4.1 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Death3274.1
3.7–4.5ROR 4.7 · χ² 795 / p 3e-175
4.1 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 3.3no trial data cached
Neoplasm progression113.4
1.9–6.1ROR 3.4 · χ² 16 / p 3e-5
3.0 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Therapy cessation153.2
1.9–5.2ROR 3.2 · χ² 20 / p 3e-6
2.9 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.7Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Death3274.1
3.7–4.5ROR 4.7 · χ² 795 / p 3e-175
4.1 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 3.3no trial data cached
Febrile neutropenia7812.7
10.2–15.8ROR 13.2 · χ² 833 / p 2e-183
12.6 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 10.1 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Bone marrow failure7640.2
32.3–50.2ROR 41.8 · χ² 2,861 / p <1e-300
39.7 EB05 32.8 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 31.9 · ♀ 13% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Drug intolerance738.2
6.5–10.3ROR 8.5 · χ² 455 / p 2e-101
7.9 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.0 · ♀ 17% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Lymphadenopathy6018.3
14.3–23.5ROR 18.9 · χ² 964 / p 6e-212
18.2 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.7 · ♀ 2% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Malignant neoplasm progression535.6
4.3–7.3ROR 5.7 · χ² 197 / p 4e-45
5.4 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.5no trial data cached
Myelosuppression4815.2
11.5–20.2ROR 15.6 · χ² 625 / p 3e-138
15.1 EB05 11.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.1 · ♀ 4% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Acute myeloid leukaemia3020.8
14.6–29.7ROR 21.1 · χ² 546 / p 5e-121
20.5 EB05 15.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 16.0no trial data cached
Cytopenia2825.3
17.5–36.6ROR 25.7 · χ² 629 / p 3e-139
24.9 EB05 18.1 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 20.0no trial data cached
Leukaemia2731.0
21.3–45.1ROR 31.4 · χ² 752 / p 8e-166
30.3 EB05 21.9 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 22.8 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Septic shock246.0
4.0–8.9ROR 6.1 · χ² 95 / p 9e-23
5.4 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached
Ejection fraction decreased2114.6
9.5–22.3ROR 14.7 · χ² 252 / p 5e-57
14.0 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 12.1 · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Electrocardiogram qt prolonged206.0
3.9–9.3ROR 6.1 · χ² 78 / p 4e-19
5.3 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.8no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Rydapt?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Rydapt are pancytopenia, febrile neutropenia, bone marrow failure, lymphadenopathy, platelet count decreased, myelosuppression. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Rydapt have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Rydapt has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Rydapt causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.