← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Scopolamine side effects: what 5,642 FDA adverse event reports show

Scopolamine · 507 reaction terms · 17,111 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Anticholinergic

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

5,642 reports · 68% serious · 746 with death outcome · 65% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Scopolamine transdermal system is indicated in adults for the prevention of: nausea and vomiting associated with motion sickness. post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) associated with recovery from anesthesia and/or opiate analgesia and surgery. Scopolamine transdermal system is an anticholinergic indicated in adults for the prevention of: nausea and vomiting associated with motion sickness.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Scopolamine transdermal system is designed for continuous release of scopolamine following application to an area of intact skin on the head, behind the ear. Each system contains 1.5 mg of scopolamine base. Scopolamine is (9-methyl-3-oxa-9-azatricyclo[3.3.1.0 2,4 ]nonan-7-yl) 3-hydroxy-2 phenylpropanoate.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 5Labeled (related wording) 11Reporting / coding artifact 5Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 17
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 467 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Mydriasis20058.9
51.4–67.6ROR 61.0 · χ² 11,155 / p <1e-300
57.7 EB05 51.3 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 34.1 · ♀ 88% (drug 65%)no trial data cached
Salivary hypersecretion3513.1
9.4–18.2ROR 13.1 · χ² 377 / p 3e-84
12.7 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.3no trial data cached
Product adhesion issue10611.1
9.2–13.5ROR 11.3 · χ² 967 / p 1e-212
11.0 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=8 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Disorientation11510.8
9.0–12.9ROR 11.0 · χ² 1,011 / p 4e-222
10.6 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 9.0no trial data cached
Aspiration2910.0
6.9–14.3ROR 10.0 · χ² 225 / p 4e-51
9.2 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.0 · ♀ 20% (drug 65%)no trial data cached
Dry mouth2059.4
8.2–10.8ROR 9.7 · χ² 1,539 / p <1e-300
9.3 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.2 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Hallucination (hallucinations)1738.6
7.4–10.0ROR 8.8 · χ² 1,155 / p 2e-253
8.5 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.6no trial data cached
Supraventricular tachycardia207.8
5.0–12.1ROR 7.8 · χ² 111 / p 2e-26
6.8 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.9no trial data cached
Drug ineffective for unapproved indication1167.7
6.5–9.3ROR 7.9 · χ² 676 / p 3e-149
7.6 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.4no trial data cached
Incorrect drug administration duration587.6
5.9–9.8ROR 7.6 · χ² 324 / p 1e-72
7.2 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.7 · 91% consumerno trial data cached
Therapeutic response unexpected887.3
5.9–9.0ROR 7.4 · χ² 470 / p 1e-104
7.0 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 10.1 · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Pneumonia aspiration477.0
5.3–9.3ROR 7.1 · χ² 237 / p 1e-53
6.6 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.9 · ♀ 33% (drug 65%)no trial data cached
Neutrophil count increased196.9
4.4–10.8ROR 6.9 · χ² 90 / p 1e-21
6.0 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Vertigo (spinning dizziness)1106.7
5.6–8.1ROR 6.8 · χ² 530 / p 1e-117
6.5 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.5 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Hiatus hernia236.6
4.4–9.9ROR 6.6 · χ² 104 / p 1e-24
5.9 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.0 · ♀ 100% (drug 65%)no trial data cached
Delirium616.6
5.1–8.4ROR 6.6 · χ² 282 / p 1e-63
6.3 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.3no trial data cached
Dermatitis contact206.6
4.2–10.2ROR 6.6 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21
5.8 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4no trial data cached
Impaired driving ability206.5
4.2–10.1ROR 6.6 · χ² 88 / p 3e-21
5.8 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.1no trial data cached
Swollen tongue546.4
4.9–8.4ROR 6.5 · χ² 242 / p 7e-55
6.1 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.2 · ♀ 100% (drug 65%)no trial data cached
Dry throat176.2
3.9–10.0ROR 6.2 · χ² 69 / p 4e-17
5.4 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=7no trial data cached
Atelectasis166.1
3.8–10.0ROR 6.2 · χ² 64 / p 7e-16
5.3 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.2no trial data cached
Hyperlipidaemia195.9
3.8–9.2ROR 5.9 · χ² 72 / p 9e-18
5.2 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Lymphocyte count decreased285.9
4.1–8.5ROR 5.9 · χ² 109 / p 9e-26
5.4 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 5.8no trial data cached
Acute respiratory failure305.8
4.1–8.3ROR 5.9 · χ² 115 / p 4e-27
5.4 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.9no trial data cached
Ileus195.7
3.7–9.0ROR 5.8 · χ² 70 / p 3e-17
5.1 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.9no trial data cached
Akathisia (inner restlessness)215.7
3.7–8.8ROR 5.7 · χ² 77 / p 8e-19
5.1 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.9no trial data cached
Hypothermia155.5
3.3–9.1ROR 5.5 · χ² 51 / p 5e-13
4.8 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.7no trial data cached
Photophobia (light sensitivity)275.4
3.7–7.8ROR 5.4 · χ² 92 / p 4e-22
4.9 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3 · ♀ 88% (drug 65%) · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Device related infection225.3
3.5–8.1ROR 5.3 · χ² 73 / p 8e-18
4.8 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.4no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Nausea6983.3
3.1–3.5ROR 3.6 · χ² 1,153 / p 4e-253
3.3 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 3.5no trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)5942.5
2.4–2.7ROR 2.7 · χ² 579 / p 3e-128
2.5 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.4no trial data cached
Vomiting4903.9
3.6–4.2ROR 4.2 · χ² 1,071 / p 3e-235
3.9 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Dizziness4473.3
3.1–3.7ROR 3.5 · χ² 747 / p 7e-165
3.3 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.3 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Headache3582.1
1.9–2.4ROR 2.2 · χ² 219 / p 8e-50
2.1 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.9no trial data cached
Malaise (feeling unwell)2502.1
1.9–2.4ROR 2.2 · χ² 149 / p 2e-34
2.1 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.0no trial data cached
Death2491.1
1.0–1.2ROR 1.1 · χ² 1 / p 0.130
1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 0.9no trial data cached
Dry mouth2059.4
8.2–10.8ROR 9.7 · χ² 1,539 / p <1e-300
9.3 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.2 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Mydriasis20058.9
51.4–67.6ROR 61.0 · χ² 11,155 / p <1e-300
57.7 EB05 51.3 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 34.1 · ♀ 88% (drug 65%)no trial data cached
Product quality issue1805.0
4.3–5.7ROR 5.1 · χ² 570 / p 4e-126
4.9 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.7 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Anxiety1792.3
2.0–2.7ROR 2.4 · χ² 137 / p 7e-32
2.3 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.6no trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication1792.7
2.4–3.1ROR 2.8 · χ² 196 / p 8e-45
2.7 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.8 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Hallucination (hallucinations)1738.6
7.4–10.0ROR 8.8 · χ² 1,155 / p 2e-253
8.5 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.6no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Scopolamine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Scopolamine are nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, vision blurred, malaise. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Scopolamine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Scopolamine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Scopolamine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.