← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Senna Laxative side effects: what 1,308 FDA adverse event reports show

Senna Laxative · 15 reaction terms · 147 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

1,308 reports · 65% serious · 163 with death outcome · 58% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

(s) relieves occasional constipation (irregularity) generally produces a bowel movement in 6-12 hours

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 12 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 3No label text to screen 8
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 3 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hospice care1931.0
19.8–48.4ROR 31.4 · χ² 520 / p 2e-115
30.1 EB05 20.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 20.8no trial data cached
Bursitis912.0
6.2–22.9ROR 12.0 · χ² 80 / p 2e-19
9.6 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 11.0no trial data cached
Coeliac disease711.4
5.5–23.9ROR 11.5 · χ² 57 / p 3e-14
8.4 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 12.6no trial data cached
Decreased immune responsiveness69.8
4.4–21.9ROR 9.9 · χ² 39 / p 2e-10
6.7 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 10.8no trial data cached
Immunodeficiency77.6
3.6–15.9ROR 7.7 · χ² 34 / p 3e-9
5.5 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 7.3no trial data cached
Blood count abnormal77.3
3.5–15.3ROR 7.3 · χ² 32 / p 8e-9
5.3 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 1.3no trial data cached
Full blood count decreased97.2
3.7–13.7ROR 7.2 · χ² 42 / p 5e-11
5.5 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 5.1no trial data cached
Upper limb fracture75.6
2.7–11.7ROR 5.6 · χ² 22 / p 1e-6
4.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 4.8no trial data cached
Disease progression415.6
4.1–7.5ROR 5.7 · χ² 150 / p 9e-35
5.3 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.5no trial data cached
Fluid overload55.4
2.3–13.0ROR 5.4 · χ² 14 / p 1e-4
3.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.4No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 6.2no trial data cached
Plasma cell myeloma135.3
3.1–9.2ROR 5.4 · χ² 42 / p 6e-11
4.5 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.1no trial data cached
Bone density decreased63.0
1.4–6.7ROR 3.0 · χ² 6 / p 0.006
2.6 EB05 1.3 · IC025 -0.0
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 3.3no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Disease progression415.6
4.1–7.5ROR 5.7 · χ² 150 / p 9e-35
5.3 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.5no trial data cached
Hospice care1931.0
19.8–48.4ROR 31.4 · χ² 520 / p 2e-115
30.1 EB05 20.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 20.8no trial data cached
Plasma cell myeloma135.3
3.1–9.2ROR 5.4 · χ² 42 / p 6e-11
4.5 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.1no trial data cached
Full blood count decreased97.2
3.7–13.7ROR 7.2 · χ² 42 / p 5e-11
5.5 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 5.1no trial data cached
Bursitis912.0
6.2–22.9ROR 12.0 · χ² 80 / p 2e-19
9.6 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 11.0no trial data cached
Upper limb fracture75.6
2.7–11.7ROR 5.6 · χ² 22 / p 1e-6
4.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 4.8no trial data cached
Blood count abnormal77.3
3.5–15.3ROR 7.3 · χ² 32 / p 8e-9
5.3 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 1.3no trial data cached
Immunodeficiency77.6
3.6–15.9ROR 7.7 · χ² 34 / p 3e-9
5.5 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 7.3no trial data cached
Coeliac disease711.4
5.5–23.9ROR 11.5 · χ² 57 / p 3e-14
8.4 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 12.6no trial data cached
Bone density decreased63.0
1.4–6.7ROR 3.0 · χ² 6 / p 0.006
2.6 EB05 1.3 · IC025 -0.0
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 3.3no trial data cached
Decreased immune responsiveness69.8
4.4–21.9ROR 9.9 · χ² 39 / p 2e-10
6.7 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 10.8no trial data cached
Fluid overload55.4
2.3–13.0ROR 5.4 · χ² 14 / p 1e-4
3.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.4No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 6.2no trial data cached
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome42.7
1.0–7.3ROR 2.7 · χ² 3 / p 0.046
2.3 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.6
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.6no trial data cached
Sickle cell anaemia with crisis44.1
1.5–10.8ROR 4.1 · χ² 6 / p 0.006
3.0 EB05 1.3 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 5.0no trial data cached
Intentional self-injury32.4
0.8–7.4ROR 2.4 · χ² 1 / p 0.134
2.0 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -1.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.4no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Senna Laxative?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Senna Laxative are hospice care, plasma cell myeloma, full blood count decreased, bursitis, upper limb fracture, blood count abnormal. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Senna Laxative have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Senna Laxative has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Senna Laxative causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.