Serdexmethylphenidate side effects: what 723 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Central nervous system (cns) stimulant
Label matched
Serdexmethylphenidate And Dexmethylphenidate (Azstarys)
Who reports
723 reports · 15% serious · 0 with death outcome · 50% female
Used for
AZSTARYS is indicated for the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in patients 6 years of age and older. Limitations of Use The use of AZSTARYS is not recommended in pediatric patients younger than 6 years of age because they ha.
What it is
AZSTARYS (serdexmethylphenidate and dexmethylphenidate) capsules contain dexmethylphenidate, a CNS stimulant, and serdexmethylphenidate, a prodrug of dexmethylphenidate. AZSTARYS capsules are .
Boxed warning
ABUSE, MISUSE, AND ADDICTION AZSTARYS has a high potential for abuse and misuse, which can lead to the development of a substance use disorder, including addiction. Misuse and abuse of CNS stimulants, including AZSTA.
Causality screen of the 18 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 2 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Therapeutic response shortened | 61 | 55.7 43.8–70.8ROR 60.7 · χ² 3,221 / p <1e-300 | 54.7 EB05 44.1 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 31.6 | no trial data cached |
| Initial insomnia | 11 | 31.3 17.4–56.3ROR 31.8 · χ² 293 / p 5e-66 | 29.8 EB05 17.7 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | – | no trial data cached |
| Psychomotor hyperactivity | 14 | 24.4 14.5–41.0ROR 24.8 · χ² 291 / p 2e-65 | 23.6 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | – | no trial data cached |
| Emotional disorder | 22 | 20.6 13.6–31.1ROR 21.2 · χ² 391 / p 3e-87 | 20.2 EB05 14.0 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 27.0 | no trial data cached |
| Anger | 22 | 18.8 12.5–28.4ROR 19.4 · χ² 353 / p 4e-79 | 18.4 EB05 12.7 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 16.6 | no trial data cached |
| Irritability | 38 | 18.3 13.4–25.0ROR 19.3 · χ² 606 / p 4e-134 | 18.1 EB05 13.7 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 3.3 | no trial data cached |
| Mania | 9 | 15.9 8.3–30.4ROR 16.1 · χ² 111 / p 3e-26 | 14.0 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 17.1 | no trial data cached |
| Disturbance in attention | 28 | 15.0 10.4–21.6ROR 15.6 · χ² 353 / p 4e-79 | 14.7 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 3.1 · 83% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Affect lability | 5 | 15.0 6.3–35.9ROR 15.1 · χ² 52 / p 3e-13 | 10.5 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | – | no trial data cached |
| Feeling jittery | 9 | 13.7 7.1–26.2ROR 13.8 · χ² 93 / p 2e-22 | 11.5 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +1.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | – | no trial data cached |
| Hallucination, visual | 9 | 12.4 6.5–23.8ROR 12.6 · χ² 84 / p 3e-20 | 10.1 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 18.6 | no trial data cached |
| Abnormal behaviour | 17 | 12.4 7.7–19.8ROR 12.6 · χ² 167 / p 2e-38 | 11.3 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 7.9 | no trial data cached |
| Product physical issue | 8 | 11.6 5.8–23.2ROR 11.8 · χ² 68 / p 1e-16 | 9.0 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | – | no trial data cached |
| Aggression | 20 | 11.6 7.5–17.8ROR 11.9 · χ² 183 / p 5e-42 | 10.7 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 8.5 | no trial data cached |
| Panic attack | 14 | 11.1 6.6–18.7ROR 11.3 · χ² 119 / p 4e-28 | 9.7 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.0 | no trial data cached |
| Hallucination, auditory | 6 | 10.9 4.9–24.3ROR 11.0 · χ² 45 / p 1e-11 | 7.5 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 8.3 | no trial data cached |
| Product availability issue | 8 | 10.4 5.2–20.6ROR 10.5 · χ² 59 / p 1e-14 | 7.8 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | – | no trial data cached |
| Mood swings | 10 | 9.1 4.9–16.8ROR 9.2 · χ² 64 / p 5e-16 | 7.1 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 6.3 | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Therapeutic response shortened | 61 | 55.7 43.8–70.8ROR 60.7 · χ² 3,221 / p <1e-300 | 54.7 EB05 44.1 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 31.6 | no trial data cached |
| Irritability | 38 | 18.3 13.4–25.0ROR 19.3 · χ² 606 / p 4e-134 | 18.1 EB05 13.7 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 3.3 | no trial data cached |
| Disturbance in attention | 28 | 15.0 10.4–21.6ROR 15.6 · χ² 353 / p 4e-79 | 14.7 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 3.1 · 83% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Anger | 22 | 18.8 12.5–28.4ROR 19.4 · χ² 353 / p 4e-79 | 18.4 EB05 12.7 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 16.6 | no trial data cached |
| Emotional disorder | 22 | 20.6 13.6–31.1ROR 21.2 · χ² 391 / p 3e-87 | 20.2 EB05 14.0 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 27.0 | no trial data cached |
| Aggression | 20 | 11.6 7.5–17.8ROR 11.9 · χ² 183 / p 5e-42 | 10.7 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 8.5 | no trial data cached |
| Abnormal behaviour | 17 | 12.4 7.7–19.8ROR 12.6 · χ² 167 / p 2e-38 | 11.3 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 7.9 | no trial data cached |
| Panic attack | 14 | 11.1 6.6–18.7ROR 11.3 · χ² 119 / p 4e-28 | 9.7 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.0 | no trial data cached |
| Psychomotor hyperactivity | 14 | 24.4 14.5–41.0ROR 24.8 · χ² 291 / p 2e-65 | 23.6 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | – | no trial data cached |
| Initial insomnia | 11 | 31.3 17.4–56.3ROR 31.8 · χ² 293 / p 5e-66 | 29.8 EB05 17.7 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | – | no trial data cached |
| Mood swings | 10 | 9.1 4.9–16.8ROR 9.2 · χ² 64 / p 5e-16 | 7.1 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 6.3 | no trial data cached |
| Hallucination, visual | 9 | 12.4 6.5–23.8ROR 12.6 · χ² 84 / p 3e-20 | 10.1 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 18.6 | no trial data cached |
| Feeling jittery | 9 | 13.7 7.1–26.2ROR 13.8 · χ² 93 / p 2e-22 | 11.5 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +1.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | – | no trial data cached |
| Mania | 9 | 15.9 8.3–30.4ROR 16.1 · χ² 111 / p 3e-26 | 14.0 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 17.1 | no trial data cached |
| Product availability issue | 8 | 10.4 5.2–20.6ROR 10.5 · χ² 59 / p 1e-14 | 7.8 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | – | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Emotional disorder — n=22, PRR 20.6
- Anger — n=22, PRR 18.8
- Aggression — n=20, PRR 11.6
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Serdexmethylphenidate?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Serdexmethylphenidate are irritability, disturbance in attention, anger, emotional disorder, aggression, abnormal behaviour. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Serdexmethylphenidate have an FDA boxed warning?
Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: ABUSE, MISUSE, AND ADDICTION AZSTARYS has a high potential for abuse and misuse, which can lead to the development of a substance use disorder, including addiction. Misuse and abuse of CNS stimulants, including AZSTA.
Do FAERS signals prove that Serdexmethylphenidate causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 00b5e716-5564-4bbd-acaf-df2bc45a5663, effective 20260511; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"SERDEXMETHYLPHENIDATE AND DEXMETHYLPHENIDATE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 20 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.