← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Monofluorophosphate side effects: what 328 FDA adverse event reports show

Sodium Monofluorophosphate · Whitening · 11 reaction terms · 81 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Brand names

Whitening

openFDA label

Who reports

328 reports · 67% serious · 30 with death outcome · 73% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

aids in the prevention of dental cavities

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 7 strongest signals

No label text to screen 7
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 4 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Oral pain1850.5
32.2–79.1ROR 53.3 · χ² 825 / p 1e-181
48.0 EB05 32.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 44.6no trial data cached
Oral discomfort1149.8
27.8–89.1ROR 51.5 · χ² 478 / p 2e-106
46.1 EB05 27.4 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=7no trial data cached
Dental caries739.9
19.2–83.1ROR 40.8 · χ² 228 / p 8e-52
36.2 EB05 18.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 30.6no trial data cached
Gingival bleeding836.9
18.6–73.1ROR 37.7 · χ² 244 / p 2e-55
34.0 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 41.8no trial data cached
Tooth fracture634.3
15.5–75.8ROR 34.9 · χ² 162 / p 2e-37
30.7 EB05 14.4 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 37.6no trial data cached
Glossodynia (burning tongue/mouth pain)1131.0
17.3–55.4ROR 32.0 · χ² 290 / p 2e-65
29.5 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 28.3no trial data cached
Tooth loss721.1
10.1–44.0ROR 21.5 · χ² 115 / p 4e-27
18.8 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 19.6no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Oral pain1850.5
32.2–79.1ROR 53.3 · χ² 825 / p 1e-181
48.0 EB05 32.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 44.6no trial data cached
Glossodynia (burning tongue/mouth pain)1131.0
17.3–55.4ROR 32.0 · χ² 290 / p 2e-65
29.5 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 28.3no trial data cached
Oral discomfort1149.8
27.8–89.1ROR 51.5 · χ² 478 / p 2e-106
46.1 EB05 27.4 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=7no trial data cached
Gingival bleeding836.9
18.6–73.1ROR 37.7 · χ² 244 / p 2e-55
34.0 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 41.8no trial data cached
Tooth loss721.1
10.1–44.0ROR 21.5 · χ² 115 / p 4e-27
18.8 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 19.6no trial data cached
Dental caries739.9
19.2–83.1ROR 40.8 · χ² 228 / p 8e-52
36.2 EB05 18.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 30.6no trial data cached
Tooth fracture634.3
15.5–75.8ROR 34.9 · χ² 162 / p 2e-37
30.7 EB05 14.4 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 37.6no trial data cached
Bone loss416.6
6.3–44.0ROR 16.8 · χ² 44 / p 2e-11
10.7 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 11.8no trial data cached
Pharmaceutical product complaint37.2
2.3–22.1ROR 7.2 · χ² 10 / p 6e-4
4.0 EB05 1.5 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 6.7no trial data cached
Menorrhagia (heavy periods)39.5
3.1–29.3ROR 9.6 · χ² 15 / p 5e-5
4.9 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.0No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 12.4no trial data cached
Hair texture abnormal314.0
4.5–43.2ROR 14.1 · χ² 24 / p 4e-7
7.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
–no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Monofluorophosphate?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Monofluorophosphate are oral pain, glossodynia, oral discomfort, gingival bleeding, tooth loss, dental caries. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Monofluorophosphate have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Monofluorophosphate has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Monofluorophosphate causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.