Tafluprost Opthalmic side effects: what 420 FDA adverse event reports show

Tafluprost Opthalmic · Tafluprost · 9 reaction terms · 79 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14

Drug class

Prostaglandin Analog

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Tafluprost

openFDA label

Who reports

420 reports · 79% serious · 19 with death outcome · 52% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Tafluprost ophthalmic solution is indicated for reducing elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Tafluprost ophthalmic solution is a prostaglandin analog indicated for reducing elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. ( 1 )

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Tafluprost ophthalmic solution 0.0015% contains tafluprost, a fluorinated analog of prostaglandin F2α, for topical ophthalmic use.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 8 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 2Not in label — unassessed 4

What the badges mean

Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show: hide coding/lab/outcome terms hide indication terms unlabeled only hide PRR-only

Reaction	Reports	PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p	EBGM EB05 · IC025	Label screen	Serious-only & strata	Trial cross-check
Glaucoma	24	62.3 42.2–91.8ROR 66.0 · χ² 1,386 / p <1e-300	59.4 EB05 42.0 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree	Likely indication confounding term in indications	serious PRR 49.0 · ♀ 32% (drug 52%)	no trial data cached
Intervertebral disc degeneration	6	32.2 14.5–71.3ROR 32.7 · χ² 152 / p 4e-35	28.8 EB05 13.3 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree	Not in label — unassessed	serious PRR 26.9	no trial data cached
Emphysema	6	29.6 13.4–65.5ROR 30.0 · χ² 138 / p 3e-32	26.5 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree	Not in label — unassessed	serious PRR 24.5	no trial data cached
Ocular discomfort	6	27.6 12.5–61.1ROR 28.0 · χ² 128 / p 5e-30	24.6 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree	Not in label — unassessed	serious n=2	no trial data cached
Intraocular pressure increased (raised eye pressure)	7	27.2 13.1–56.8ROR 27.7 · χ² 152 / p 4e-35	24.9 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree	Likely indication confounding term in indications	serious PRR 21.0	no trial data cached
Eye haemorrhage	6	22.4 10.1–49.6ROR 22.7 · χ² 102 / p 2e-24	19.4 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree	Not in label — unassessed	serious PRR 18.4	no trial data cached
Uveitis	6	22.2 10.0–49.1ROR 22.5 · χ² 101 / p 4e-24	19.2 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree	Labeled adverse reaction exact term	serious PRR 14.4	no trial data cached
Eye irritation	15	13.4 8.2–22.1ROR 13.9 · χ² 161 / p 4e-37	12.4 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree	Labeled (related wording) related wording	serious PRR 3.3	no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

Reaction	Reports	PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p	EBGM EB05 · IC025	Label screen	Serious-only & strata	Trial cross-check
Glaucoma	24	62.3 42.2–91.8ROR 66.0 · χ² 1,386 / p <1e-300	59.4 EB05 42.0 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree	Likely indication confounding term in indications	serious PRR 49.0 · ♀ 32% (drug 52%)	no trial data cached
Eye irritation	15	13.4 8.2–22.1ROR 13.9 · χ² 161 / p 4e-37	12.4 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree	Labeled (related wording) related wording	serious PRR 3.3	no trial data cached
Intraocular pressure increased (raised eye pressure)	7	27.2 13.1–56.8ROR 27.7 · χ² 152 / p 4e-35	24.9 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree	Likely indication confounding term in indications	serious PRR 21.0	no trial data cached
Uveitis	6	22.2 10.0–49.1ROR 22.5 · χ² 101 / p 4e-24	19.2 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree	Labeled adverse reaction exact term	serious PRR 14.4	no trial data cached
Eye haemorrhage	6	22.4 10.1–49.6ROR 22.7 · χ² 102 / p 2e-24	19.4 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree	Not in label — unassessed	serious PRR 18.4	no trial data cached
Ocular discomfort	6	27.6 12.5–61.1ROR 28.0 · χ² 128 / p 5e-30	24.6 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree	Not in label — unassessed	serious n=2	no trial data cached
Emphysema	6	29.6 13.4–65.5ROR 30.0 · χ² 138 / p 3e-32	26.5 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree	Not in label — unassessed	serious PRR 24.5	no trial data cached
Intervertebral disc degeneration	6	32.2 14.5–71.3ROR 32.7 · χ² 152 / p 4e-35	28.8 EB05 13.3 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree	Not in label — unassessed	serious PRR 26.9	no trial data cached
Device use issue	3	8.7 2.8–26.7ROR 8.7 · χ² 13 / p 1e-4	4.5 EB05 1.7 · IC025 -0.0 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC	Reporting / coding artifact	–	no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Tafluprost Opthalmic?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Tafluprost Opthalmic are glaucoma, eye irritation, intraocular pressure increased, uveitis, eye haemorrhage, ocular discomfort. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Tafluprost Opthalmic have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Tafluprost Opthalmic has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Tafluprost Opthalmic causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

FDA label via openFDA (set ID fcaab8b3-3791-49ba-909e-a09651a30b33, effective 20260306; matched on openfda.generic_name.exact:"TAFLUPROST OPTHALMIC")
Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA count= aggregation, field patient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 9 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction
Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA count=serious, patient.patientsex, seriousnessdeath

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.