Tafluprost side effects: what 2,905 FDA adverse event reports show
Who reports
2,905 reports · 35% serious · 330 with death outcome · 70% female
Used for
Tafluprost ophthalmic solution is indicated for reducing elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Tafluprost ophthalmic solution is a prostaglandin analog indicated for reducing elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. ( 1 )
What it is
Tafluprost ophthalmic solution 0.0015% contains tafluprost, a fluorinated analog of prostaglandin F2α, for topical ophthalmic use.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 25 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 34 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ocular hyperaemia | 464 | 72.4 66.6–78.7ROR 85.9 · χ² 32,336 / p <1e-300 | 71.5 EB05 66.2 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 14.9 · 73% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye irritation | 425 | 55.4 50.7–60.5ROR 64.8 · χ² 22,545 / p <1e-300 | 54.9 EB05 50.6 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 14.8 · 76% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Intraocular pressure increased (raised eye pressure) | 97 | 54.9 45.1–66.8ROR 56.8 · χ² 5,045 / p <1e-300 | 54.0 EB05 45.5 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious PRR 24.5 | no trial data cached |
| Eye pruritus | 230 | 50.7 44.8–57.4ROR 55.0 · χ² 11,092 / p <1e-300 | 50.1 EB05 44.9 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 10.7 · 73% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye pain | 293 | 38.5 34.5–42.9ROR 42.7 · χ² 10,630 / p <1e-300 | 38.2 EB05 34.7 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 9.4 · 75% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Photophobia (light sensitivity) | 86 | 33.4 27.1–41.1ROR 34.4 · χ² 2,659 / p <1e-300 | 33.0 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.3 · 75% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye discharge | 42 | 29.8 22.0–40.2ROR 30.2 · χ² 1,135 / p 3e-249 | 29.3 EB05 22.6 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | 77% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Ocular discomfort | 39 | 26.0 19.0–35.5ROR 26.3 · χ² 910 / p 4e-200 | 25.6 EB05 19.6 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=5 · 75% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye swelling | 122 | 23.9 20.1–28.4ROR 24.9 · χ² 2,648 / p <1e-300 | 23.7 EB05 20.4 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 6.1 · 74% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye inflammation | 25 | 19.2 13.0–28.3ROR 19.3 · χ² 412 / p 8e-92 | 18.8 EB05 13.3 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=5 | no trial data cached |
| Lacrimation increased | 74 | 17.9 14.3–22.4ROR 18.4 · χ² 1,164 / p 3e-255 | 17.8 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 7.2 · 71% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Dry eye | 110 | 16.4 13.7–19.7ROR 17.0 · χ² 1,577 / p <1e-300 | 16.3 EB05 13.9 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 10.0 · 80% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Glaucoma | 41 | 15.4 11.3–20.9ROR 15.6 · χ² 536 / p 6e-119 | 15.2 EB05 11.5 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious PRR 23.8 | no trial data cached |
| Eyelid oedema | 17 | 10.5 6.5–16.9ROR 10.5 · χ² 137 / p 8e-32 | 9.3 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | – | no trial data cached |
| Vision blurred (blurred vision) | 174 | 9.2 8.0–10.6ROR 9.7 · χ² 1,270 / p 2e-278 | 9.1 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 3.5 · 75% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye infection | 12 | 7.7 4.4–13.6ROR 7.8 · χ² 64 / p 7e-16 | 6.3 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=1 | no trial data cached |
| Eye haemorrhage | 14 | 7.6 4.5–12.8ROR 7.6 · χ² 73 / p 6e-18 | 6.3 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.9 | no trial data cached |
| Incorrect product storage | 13 | 7.0 4.1–12.1ROR 7.1 · χ² 61 / p 2e-15 | 5.8 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | – | no trial data cached |
| Visual acuity reduced | 26 | 5.6 3.8–8.2ROR 5.6 · χ² 94 / p 2e-22 | 5.1 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 5.2 | no trial data cached |
| Uveitis | 10 | 5.3 2.9–9.9ROR 5.4 · χ² 31 / p 1e-8 | 4.4 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 7.5 | no trial data cached |
| Conjunctivitis | 10 | 3.9 2.1–7.3ROR 3.9 · χ² 19 / p 7e-6 | 3.4 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 3.6 | no trial data cached |
| Blindness | 18 | 3.2 2.0–5.1ROR 3.2 · χ² 25 / p 3e-7 | 3.0 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 4.5 | no trial data cached |
| Cataract | 26 | 3.2 2.2–4.6ROR 3.2 · χ² 36 / p 8e-10 | 3.0 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 4.7 | no trial data cached |
| Visual impairment | 50 | 2.9 2.2–3.9ROR 3.0 · χ² 62 / p 2e-15 | 2.9 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 3.3 | no trial data cached |
| Eye disorder | 13 | 2.9 1.7–4.9ROR 2.9 · χ² 14 / p 9e-5 | 2.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.5 | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 6.1 | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ocular hyperaemia | 464 | 72.4 66.6–78.7ROR 85.9 · χ² 32,336 / p <1e-300 | 71.5 EB05 66.2 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 14.9 · 73% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye irritation | 425 | 55.4 50.7–60.5ROR 64.8 · χ² 22,545 / p <1e-300 | 54.9 EB05 50.6 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 14.8 · 76% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye pain | 293 | 38.5 34.5–42.9ROR 42.7 · χ² 10,630 / p <1e-300 | 38.2 EB05 34.7 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 9.4 · 75% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye pruritus | 230 | 50.7 44.8–57.4ROR 55.0 · χ² 11,092 / p <1e-300 | 50.1 EB05 44.9 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 10.7 · 73% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Vision blurred (blurred vision) | 174 | 9.2 8.0–10.6ROR 9.7 · χ² 1,270 / p 2e-278 | 9.1 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 3.5 · 75% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Eye swelling | 122 | 23.9 20.1–28.4ROR 24.9 · χ² 2,648 / p <1e-300 | 23.7 EB05 20.4 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 6.1 · 74% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Dry eye | 110 | 16.4 13.7–19.7ROR 17.0 · χ² 1,577 / p <1e-300 | 16.3 EB05 13.9 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 10.0 · 80% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Intraocular pressure increased (raised eye pressure) | 97 | 54.9 45.1–66.8ROR 56.8 · χ² 5,045 / p <1e-300 | 54.0 EB05 45.5 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious PRR 24.5 | no trial data cached |
| Photophobia (light sensitivity) | 86 | 33.4 27.1–41.1ROR 34.4 · χ² 2,659 / p <1e-300 | 33.0 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.3 · 75% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Lacrimation increased | 74 | 17.9 14.3–22.4ROR 18.4 · χ² 1,164 / p 3e-255 | 17.8 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 7.2 · 71% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Visual impairment | 50 | 2.9 2.2–3.9ROR 3.0 · χ² 62 / p 2e-15 | 2.9 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 3.3 | no trial data cached |
| Eye discharge | 42 | 29.8 22.0–40.2ROR 30.2 · χ² 1,135 / p 3e-249 | 29.3 EB05 22.6 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | 77% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Glaucoma | 41 | 15.4 11.3–20.9ROR 15.6 · χ² 536 / p 6e-119 | 15.2 EB05 11.5 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious PRR 23.8 | no trial data cached |
| Ocular discomfort | 39 | 26.0 19.0–35.5ROR 26.3 · χ² 910 / p 4e-200 | 25.6 EB05 19.6 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=5 · 75% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Product quality issue | 35 | 1.9 1.3–2.6ROR 1.9 · χ² 13 / p 1e-4 | 1.9 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.3 | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 2.2 | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Ocular hyperaemia — n=464, PRR 72.4
- Photophobia — n=86, PRR 33.4
- Eye discharge — n=42, PRR 29.8
- Ocular discomfort — n=39, PRR 26.0
- Eye swelling — n=122, PRR 23.9
- Lacrimation increased — n=74, PRR 17.9
- Visual acuity reduced — n=26, PRR 5.6
- Visual impairment — n=50, PRR 2.9
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Tafluprost?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Tafluprost are ocular hyperaemia, eye irritation, eye pain, eye pruritus, vision blurred, eye swelling. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Tafluprost have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Tafluprost has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Tafluprost causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID bfffa484-4105-45ec-ab1d-124e96639f35, effective 20260815; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"TAFLUPROST") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 59 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.