← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Tazemetostat side effects: what 1,592 FDA adverse event reports show

Tazemetostat · Tazverik · 23 reaction terms · 971 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Methyltransferase inhibitor

FDA label, Indications wording

Brand names

Tazverik

openFDA label

Who reports

1,592 reports · 44% serious · 209 with death outcome · 46% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

TAZVERIK is a methyltransferase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of: Adults and pediatric patients aged 16 years and older with metastatic or locally advanced epithelioid sarcoma not eligible for complete resection. ( 1.1 ) Adult patients with rel.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Tazemetostat is a methyltransferase inhibitor. Tazemetostat hydrobromide has the following chemical name: [1,1'-Biphenyl]-3-carboxamide, N -[(1,2-dihydro-4,6-dimethyl-2-oxo-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-5-[ethyl(tetrahydro-2 H -pyran-4-yl)amino]-4-methyl-4'-(4-morpholinylmethyl)-, hydrobromide (1:1).

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 16 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 2Reporting / coding artifact 4Lab value / disease marker 4Not in label — unassessed 3
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 7 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Taste disorder5234.1
26.1–44.6ROR 35.2 · χ² 1,637 / p <1e-300
33.7 EB05 26.7 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 26.0 · ♀ 67% (drug 46%)no trial data cached
Disease progression30534.0
30.8–37.6ROR 41.8 · χ² 9,773 / p <1e-300
33.9 EB05 30.8 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 22.7no trial data cached
Full blood count abnormal1012.5
6.7–23.1ROR 12.5 · χ² 94 / p 1e-22
10.4 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 13.1no trial data cached
Myelodysplastic syndrome1311.8
6.9–20.3ROR 11.9 · χ² 118 / p 9e-28
10.3 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 15.7no trial data cached
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased129.9
5.6–17.4ROR 9.9 · χ² 87 / p 5e-21
8.1 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 12.7no trial data cached
Product dose omission issue2129.8
8.6–11.1ROR 11.1 · χ² 1,683 / p <1e-300
9.7 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 14.7 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Lymphadenopathy217.8
5.1–11.9ROR 7.9 · χ² 118 / p 1e-27
6.9 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.0no trial data cached
Red blood cell count decreased167.3
4.5–11.9ROR 7.4 · χ² 81 / p 9e-20
6.2 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 8.0no trial data cached
Bone pain265.8
4.0–8.5ROR 5.9 · χ² 99 / p 1e-23
5.3 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.1 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Covid-19725.3
4.3–6.7ROR 5.5 · χ² 252 / p 5e-57
5.2 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.7no trial data cached
Neutrophil count decreased165.2
3.2–8.4ROR 5.2 · χ² 50 / p 8e-13
4.6 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Intentional dose omission104.8
2.6–8.9ROR 4.8 · χ² 26 / p 1e-7
4.0 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.6no trial data cached
Alopecia (hair loss)694.6
3.7–5.8ROR 4.8 · χ² 193 / p 4e-44
4.5 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.0 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Malignant neoplasm progression344.4
3.1–6.1ROR 4.5 · χ² 86 / p 1e-20
4.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.9no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Disease progression30534.0
30.8–37.6ROR 41.8 · χ² 9,773 / p <1e-300
33.9 EB05 30.8 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 22.7no trial data cached
Product dose omission issue2129.8
8.6–11.1ROR 11.1 · χ² 1,683 / p <1e-300
9.7 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 14.7 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Covid-19725.3
4.3–6.7ROR 5.5 · χ² 252 / p 5e-57
5.2 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.7no trial data cached
Alopecia (hair loss)694.6
3.7–5.8ROR 4.8 · χ² 193 / p 4e-44
4.5 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.0 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Taste disorder5234.1
26.1–44.6ROR 35.2 · χ² 1,637 / p <1e-300
33.7 EB05 26.7 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 26.0 · ♀ 67% (drug 46%)no trial data cached
Malignant neoplasm progression344.4
3.1–6.1ROR 4.5 · χ² 86 / p 1e-20
4.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.9no trial data cached
Bone pain265.8
4.0–8.5ROR 5.9 · χ² 99 / p 1e-23
5.3 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.1 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Lymphadenopathy217.8
5.1–11.9ROR 7.9 · χ² 118 / p 1e-27
6.9 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.0no trial data cached
Neutrophil count decreased165.2
3.2–8.4ROR 5.2 · χ² 50 / p 8e-13
4.6 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Red blood cell count decreased167.3
4.5–11.9ROR 7.4 · χ² 81 / p 9e-20
6.2 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 8.0no trial data cached
Myelodysplastic syndrome1311.8
6.9–20.3ROR 11.9 · χ² 118 / p 9e-28
10.3 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 15.7no trial data cached
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased129.9
5.6–17.4ROR 9.9 · χ² 87 / p 5e-21
8.1 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 12.7no trial data cached
Intentional dose omission104.8
2.6–8.9ROR 4.8 · χ² 26 / p 1e-7
4.0 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.6no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Tazemetostat?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Tazemetostat are covid-19, alopecia, platelet count decreased, taste disorder, bone pain, lymphadenopathy. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Tazemetostat have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Tazemetostat has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Tazemetostat causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.