← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Tenecteplase side effects: what 1,560 FDA adverse event reports show

Tenecteplase · Tnkase · 34 reaction terms · 1,708 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Tissue plasminogen activator (tpa)

FDA label, Indications wording

Brand names

Tnkase

openFDA label

Who reports

1,560 reports · 74% serious · 365 with death outcome · 46% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

TNKase is a tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) indicated: for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in adults. ( 1.1 ) to reduce the risk of death associated with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in adults. ( 1.2 ) 1.1 Acute Ischemic Stroke TNKase is indicated for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in adults.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Tenecteplase is a tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) produced by recombinant DNA technology using a mammalian cell line (Chinese Hamster Ovary cells). Tenecteplase is a 527-amino acid glycopro.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 24 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 6Labeled (related wording) 5Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 4Not in label — unassessed 8
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 10 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Cerebral haemorrhage15859.6
51.4–69.2ROR 66.3 · χ² 9,027 / p <1e-300
59.0 EB05 51.7 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 45.9 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Subarachnoid haemorrhage4458.1
43.4–77.8ROR 59.8 · χ² 2,405 / p <1e-300
56.5 EB05 43.9 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 40.8 · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Angioedema (deep swelling of face/throat)12136.9
31.1–43.9ROR 40.0 · χ² 4,193 / p <1e-300
36.7 EB05 31.5 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 29.9 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Cardiogenic shock3432.1
23.0–44.8ROR 32.8 · χ² 992 / p 5e-218
31.5 EB05 23.6 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 24.8 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
No adverse event31123.6
21.4–26.1ROR 29.2 · χ² 6,756 / p <1e-300
23.5 EB05 21.4 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 10.6no trial data cached
Hemiparesis2922.9
16.0–32.9ROR 23.3 · χ² 585 / p 1e-129
22.6 EB05 16.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.1 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Ischaemic stroke2518.8
12.8–27.8ROR 19.1 · χ² 404 / p 3e-90
18.5 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 14.6 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Brain oedema1718.1
11.3–29.1ROR 18.3 · χ² 258 / p 2e-58
17.6 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.1no trial data cached
Pneumonia aspiration2513.5
9.1–19.9ROR 13.7 · χ² 277 / p 2e-62
13.0 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.5 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Haematoma2311.9
7.9–17.8ROR 12.1 · χ² 219 / p 8e-50
11.1 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.6 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Aphasia (loss of speech)2410.7
7.2–15.9ROR 10.8 · χ² 201 / p 7e-46
9.8 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.4 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Haemorrhage7910.2
8.2–12.6ROR 10.7 · χ² 646 / p 7e-143
9.9 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Product preparation error159.7
5.9–16.1ROR 9.8 · χ² 109 / p 8e-26
8.3 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Medication error409.7
7.1–13.2ROR 9.9 · χ² 304 / p 2e-68
9.2 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached
Haematemesis (vomiting blood)179.0
5.6–14.4ROR 9.1 · χ² 113 / p 1e-26
7.8 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.1no trial data cached
Acute myocardial infarction188.2
5.2–12.9ROR 8.3 · χ² 106 / p 3e-25
7.1 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)4126.4
5.9–6.9ROR 8.3 · χ² 1,945 / p <1e-300
6.3 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.9no trial data cached
Shock105.9
3.2–10.9ROR 5.9 · χ² 36 / p 1e-9
4.7 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.6no trial data cached
Circumstance or information capable of leading to medication error124.8
2.7–8.5ROR 4.8 · χ² 33 / p 6e-9
4.1 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=2no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)4126.4
5.9–6.9ROR 8.3 · χ² 1,945 / p <1e-300
6.3 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.9no trial data cached
No adverse event31123.6
21.4–26.1ROR 29.2 · χ² 6,756 / p <1e-300
23.5 EB05 21.4 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 10.6no trial data cached
Cerebral haemorrhage15859.6
51.4–69.2ROR 66.3 · χ² 9,027 / p <1e-300
59.0 EB05 51.7 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 45.9 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Angioedema (deep swelling of face/throat)12136.9
31.1–43.9ROR 40.0 · χ² 4,193 / p <1e-300
36.7 EB05 31.5 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 29.9 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Haemorrhage7910.2
8.2–12.6ROR 10.7 · χ² 646 / p 7e-143
9.9 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Subarachnoid haemorrhage4458.1
43.4–77.8ROR 59.8 · χ² 2,405 / p <1e-300
56.5 EB05 43.9 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 40.8 · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Medication error409.7
7.1–13.2ROR 9.9 · χ² 304 / p 2e-68
9.2 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached
Cardiogenic shock3432.1
23.0–44.8ROR 32.8 · χ² 992 / p 5e-218
31.5 EB05 23.6 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 24.8 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Hemiparesis2922.9
16.0–32.9ROR 23.3 · χ² 585 / p 1e-129
22.6 EB05 16.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.1 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Pneumonia aspiration2513.5
9.1–19.9ROR 13.7 · χ² 277 / p 2e-62
13.0 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.5 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Ischaemic stroke2518.8
12.8–27.8ROR 19.1 · χ² 404 / p 3e-90
18.5 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 14.6 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Aphasia (loss of speech)2410.7
7.2–15.9ROR 10.8 · χ² 201 / p 7e-46
9.8 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.4 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Tenecteplase?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Tenecteplase are cerebral haemorrhage, angioedema, haemorrhage intracranial, haemorrhage, cerebrovascular accident, subarachnoid haemorrhage. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Tenecteplase have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Tenecteplase has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Tenecteplase causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.