← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Trifluoperazine side effects: what 122 FDA adverse event reports show

Trifluoperazine Hydrochloride · 15 reaction terms · 460 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Trifluoperazine Hydrochloride (Trifluoperazine Hydrochloride)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

122 reports · 87% serious · 6 with death outcome · 49% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

For the management of schizophrenia. Trifluoperazine hydrochloride tablets, USP are effective for the short-term treatment of generalized non-psychotic anxiety. However, trifluoperazine hydrochloride tablets are not the first drug to be used in therapy for most patients with non-psychotic anxiety because certain risks associated with its use are not shared by common alternative treatments (i.e., benzodiazepines).

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Each film-coated tablet, for oral administration, contains trifluoperazine hydrochloride, USP equivalent to 1 mg, 2 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg trifluoperazine.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

Increased Mortality in Elderly Patients with Dementia-Related Psychosis Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Analyses of seventeen place.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 14 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 1Reporting / coding artifact 3Not in label — unassessed 7
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Euphoric mood45753.9
597.2–951.7ROR 1,193.9 · χ² 32,957 / p <1e-300
568.2 EB05 442.0 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=45 · ♀ 12% (drug 49%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Akathisia (inner restlessness)41517.8
403.3–664.9ROR 779.4 · χ² 20,586 / p <1e-300
415.7 EB05 319.5 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 487.5 · ♀ 0% (drug 49%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Obesity38410.3
315.0–534.4ROR 595.4 · χ² 15,083 / p <1e-300
339.3 EB05 258.0 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 314.9 · ♀ 0% (drug 49%)no trial data cached
Increased appetite40366.5
284.2–472.7ROR 544.8 · χ² 14,200 / p <1e-300
311.3 EB05 238.4 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 628.9 · ♀ 0% (drug 49%)no trial data cached
Leukaemia19347.0
229.4–524.7ROR 410.8 · χ² 6,203 / p <1e-300
256.9 EB05 173.8 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 230.9no trial data cached
Prescribed overdose37329.2
251.5–431.0ROR 472.1 · χ² 11,769 / p <1e-300
280.9 EB05 212.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 371.5 · ♀ 0% (drug 49%)no trial data cached
Leukopenia (low white blood cells)41141.4
110.1–181.4ROR 212.4 · χ² 5,583 / p <1e-300
132.6 EB05 101.9 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 97.2 · ♀ 3% (drug 49%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Suicide attempt45127.4
101.0–160.7ROR 201.2 · χ² 5,528 / p <1e-300
120.9 EB05 94.0 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 84.5 · ♀ 0% (drug 49%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Irritability38108.5
83.3–141.3ROR 157.1 · χ² 3,950 / p <1e-300
103.0 EB05 78.3 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 127.1 · ♀ 0% (drug 49%)no trial data cached
Therapeutic product effect incomplete3994.8
73.2–122.9ROR 138.9 · χ² 3,538 / p <1e-300
90.7 EB05 69.2 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 118.2 · ♀ 0% (drug 49%)no trial data cached
Intentional self-injury976.7
40.9–143.9ROR 82.7 · χ² 599 / p 1e-132
66.4 EB05 37.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 51.3no trial data cached
Toxicity to various agents4546.1
36.5–58.1ROR 72.5 · χ² 1,956 / p <1e-300
45.3 EB05 35.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 31.4 · ♀ 2% (drug 49%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug abuse1530.8
19.2–49.5ROR 35.0 · χ² 405 / p 2e-90
29.8 EB05 19.1 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 20.7no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Toxicity to various agents4546.1
36.5–58.1ROR 72.5 · χ² 1,956 / p <1e-300
45.3 EB05 35.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 31.4 · ♀ 2% (drug 49%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Suicide attempt45127.4
101.0–160.7ROR 201.2 · χ² 5,528 / p <1e-300
120.9 EB05 94.0 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 84.5 · ♀ 0% (drug 49%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Euphoric mood45753.9
597.2–951.7ROR 1,193.9 · χ² 32,957 / p <1e-300
568.2 EB05 442.0 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=45 · ♀ 12% (drug 49%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Leukopenia (low white blood cells)41141.4
110.1–181.4ROR 212.4 · χ² 5,583 / p <1e-300
132.6 EB05 101.9 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 97.2 · ♀ 3% (drug 49%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Akathisia (inner restlessness)41517.8
403.3–664.9ROR 779.4 · χ² 20,586 / p <1e-300
415.7 EB05 319.5 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 487.5 · ♀ 0% (drug 49%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Increased appetite40366.5
284.2–472.7ROR 544.8 · χ² 14,200 / p <1e-300
311.3 EB05 238.4 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 628.9 · ♀ 0% (drug 49%)no trial data cached
Therapeutic product effect incomplete3994.8
73.2–122.9ROR 138.9 · χ² 3,538 / p <1e-300
90.7 EB05 69.2 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 118.2 · ♀ 0% (drug 49%)no trial data cached
Irritability38108.5
83.3–141.3ROR 157.1 · χ² 3,950 / p <1e-300
103.0 EB05 78.3 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 127.1 · ♀ 0% (drug 49%)no trial data cached
Obesity38410.3
315.0–534.4ROR 595.4 · χ² 15,083 / p <1e-300
339.3 EB05 258.0 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 314.9 · ♀ 0% (drug 49%)no trial data cached
Prescribed overdose37329.2
251.5–431.0ROR 472.1 · χ² 11,769 / p <1e-300
280.9 EB05 212.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 371.5 · ♀ 0% (drug 49%)no trial data cached
Leukaemia19347.0
229.4–524.7ROR 410.8 · χ² 6,203 / p <1e-300
256.9 EB05 173.8 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 230.9no trial data cached
Drug abuse1530.8
19.2–49.5ROR 35.0 · χ² 405 / p 2e-90
29.8 EB05 19.1 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 20.7no trial data cached
Intentional self-injury976.7
40.9–143.9ROR 82.7 · χ² 599 / p 1e-132
66.4 EB05 37.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 51.3no trial data cached
Libido decreased (lower sex drive)341.6
13.6–127.3ROR 42.6 · χ² 82 / p 8e-20
28.9 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +0.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 48.9no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Trifluoperazine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Trifluoperazine are toxicity to various agents, suicide attempt, euphoric mood, leukopenia, akathisia, increased appetite. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Trifluoperazine have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: Increased Mortality in Elderly Patients with Dementia-Related Psychosis Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Analyses of seventeen place.

Do FAERS signals prove that Trifluoperazine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.