← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Valproate side effects: what 20,550 FDA adverse event reports show

Valproate Sodium · 1,171 reaction terms · 87,243 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Valproate Sodium (Valproate Sodium)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

20,550 reports · 94% serious · 1,822 with death outcome · 47% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Valproate Sodium Injection is indicated as an intravenous alternative in patients in whom oral administration of valproate products is temporarily not feasible in the following conditions: Monotherapy and adjunctive therapy of complex partial seizures .

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Valproate sodium is the sodium salt of valproic acid designated as sodium 2-propylpentanoate. Valproate sodium has the following structure: Valproate sodium has a molecular weight of 166.2. It occurs as an essentially white and odorless, crystalline, deliquescent powder.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

LIFE THREATENING ADVERSE REACTIONS WARNING: LIFE THREATENING ADVERSE REACTIONS See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning Hepatotoxicity, including fatalities, usually during the first 6 months of treatment. Children under the age of two years and patients with mitochondrial disorders are at higher risk.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 8Likely indication confounding 3Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 26
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,131 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Ear, nose and throat disorder61786.8
563.0–1,099.6ROR 789.1 · calibrated p 2e-15 ✓
388.0 EB05 312.9 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=61 · ♀ 27% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Hypertelorism42741.3
497.7–1,104.0ROR 742.8 · calibrated p 8e-15 ✓
357.5 EB05 275.6 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42no trial data cached
Arachnodactyly23564.4
338.8–940.2ROR 565.0 · calibrated p 5e-13 ✓
278.2 EB05 195.3 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23no trial data cached
Prognathism26408.7
259.1–644.6ROR 409.2 · calibrated p 5e-12 ✓
239.8 EB05 171.9 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26no trial data cached
Social (pragmatic) communication disorder18355.1
207.5–607.6ROR 355.4 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓
205.6 EB05 137.6 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial data cached
Camptodactyly congenital19341.3
202.9–574.2ROR 341.7 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓
203.2 EB05 137.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial data cached
Neovascularisation55279.5
207.4–376.6ROR 280.2 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓
203.5 EB05 162.2 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=55 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Antipsychotic drug level below therapeutic147274.4
228.8–329.1ROR 276.3 · calibrated p 3e-11 ✓
209.9 EB05 183.0 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=147 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Pectus excavatum38231.7
162.9–329.6ROR 232.1 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓
172.3 EB05 131.0 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=38 · ♀ 26% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Joint laxity53216.7
161.1–291.6ROR 217.3 · calibrated p 4e-10 ✓
167.8 EB05 133.2 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=53 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Ligament laxity25209.6
136.2–322.4ROR 209.8 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
153.5 EB05 109.3 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25no trial data cached
Dysmorphism387198.3
178.0–221.0ROR 202.1 · calibrated p 4e-10 ✓
164.5 EB05 151.2 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=387no trial data cached
Cerebral salt-wasting syndrome16196.3
114.9–335.3ROR 196.5 · calibrated p 5e-9 ✓
137.8 EB05 89.9 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Congenital oral malformation30161.4
109.8–237.2ROR 161.6 · calibrated p 8e-9 ✓
128.1 EB05 94.0 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=30no trial data cached
Tooth malformation23154.3
99.5–239.2ROR 154.4 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
120.7 EB05 84.7 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=23 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Facial dysmorphism28146.0
98.2–216.9ROR 146.2 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
117.5 EB05 85.4 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27no trial data cached
Prominent epicanthal folds17137.9
83.1–228.9ROR 138.0 · calibrated p 6e-8 ✓
107.1 EB05 70.8 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
Dyspraxia66136.9
105.9–177.0ROR 137.3 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
116.6 EB05 94.9 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=66 · ♀ 26% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Encopresis23135.3
87.6–209.1ROR 135.5 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
108.8 EB05 76.4 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Speech sound disorder20133.3
83.6–212.4ROR 133.4 · calibrated p 6e-8 ✓
106.1 EB05 72.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20no trial data cached
Clinodactyly32133.0
92.0–192.3ROR 133.2 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
110.0 EB05 81.6 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32no trial data cached
Bone marrow transplant rejection25129.0
85.1–195.5ROR 129.1 · calibrated p 6e-8 ✓
105.4 EB05 75.1 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25no trial data cached
Dyscalculia27124.6
83.6–185.8ROR 124.8 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓
103.1 EB05 74.4 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27 · ♀ 69% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Retinogram abnormal29123.1
83.7–181.0ROR 123.3 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓
102.5 EB05 74.9 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=29 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Congenital genital malformation17119.6
72.3–197.7ROR 119.7 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
95.8 EB05 63.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=17no trial data cached
Intellectual disability148119.0
100.4–141.1ROR 119.9 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
105.1 EB05 91.7 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=148no trial data cached
Learning disorder245114.0
100.0–130.0ROR 115.4 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
101.7 EB05 91.5 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=245no trial data cached
Hypermobility syndrome49112.0
83.4–150.5ROR 112.3 · calibrated p 9e-8 ✓
97.2 EB05 76.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=49no trial data cached
Rebound psychosis20105.9
66.8–167.8ROR 106.0 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
88.1 EB05 60.2 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20no trial data cached
Echolalia30105.5
72.5–153.7ROR 105.7 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
90.3 EB05 66.3 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Sinus rhythm41105.2
76.3–145.1ROR 105.4 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
91.4 EB05 70.2 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=41 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Language disorder198103.0
89.0–119.1ROR 104.0 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
92.7 EB05 82.4 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=198no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,4611.1
1.1–1.2ROR 1.1 · calibrated p 0.401
1.1 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.9no trial data cached
Drug interaction1,2748.3
7.8–8.7ROR 8.7 · calibrated p 0.051
8.2 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.4 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,1881.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.590
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.5no trial data cached
Foetal exposure during pregnancy1,04913.3
12.6–14.2ROR 14.0 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓
13.2 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.2no trial data cached
Somnolence (drowsiness)9965.1
4.8–5.4ROR 5.3 · calibrated p 0.206
5.0 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.2no trial data cached
Epilepsy85429.4
27.5–31.4ROR 30.6 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
28.5 EB05 27.0 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 17.6no trial data cached
Seizure7947.1
6.6–7.6ROR 7.3 · calibrated p 0.086
7.0 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 4.5no trial data cached
Toxicity to various agents7874.8
4.5–5.1ROR 5.0 · calibrated p 0.240
4.8 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.0 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Vomiting6421.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.583
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 1.2no trial data cached
Convulsion (seizure)61210.9
10.1–11.8ROR 11.2 · calibrated p 0.022 ✓
10.7 EB05 10.0 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))5414.1
3.8–4.4ROR 4.2 · calibrated p 0.348
4.1 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.5no trial data cached
Condition aggravated5351.8
1.7–2.0ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.848
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)5340.8
0.8–0.9ROR 0.8 · calibrated p 0.209
0.8 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.4
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.9no trial data cached
Nausea5200.7
0.6–0.7ROR 0.7 · calibrated p 0.113
0.7 EB05 0.6 · IC025 -0.7
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.8no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Valproate ↔ Hyperammonaemia / encephalopathy.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Valproate?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Valproate are somnolence, epilepsy, seizure, toxicity to various agents, pyrexia, vomiting. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Valproate have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: LIFE THREATENING ADVERSE REACTIONS WARNING: LIFE THREATENING ADVERSE REACTIONS See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning Hepatotoxicity, including fatalities, usually during the first 6 months of treatment. Children under the age of two years and patients with mitochondrial disorders are at higher risk.

Do FAERS signals prove that Valproate causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.