← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Zavegepant side effects: what 856 FDA adverse event reports show

Zavegepant · Zavzpret · 14 reaction terms · 531 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist

FDA label, Indications wording

Brand names

Zavzpret

openFDA label

Who reports

856 reports · 9% serious · 0 with death outcome · 89% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

ZAVZPRET is indicated for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. Limitations of Use ZAVZPRET is not indicated for the preventive treatment of migraine. ZAVZPRET is a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist indicated for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. ( 1 ) Limitations of Use ZAVZPRET is not indicated for the preventive treatment of migraine. ( 1 )

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

ZAVZPRET (zavegepant) nasal spray contains zavegepant hydrochloride, a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist. Zavegepant hydrochloride is described chemically as (R)-N-(3-(7-meth.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 12 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 4Not in label — unassessed 5
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 2 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Dysgeusia (altered taste)24881.5
73.4–90.6ROR 114.3 · χ² 19,647 / p <1e-300
80.8 EB05 72.7 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 18.6no trial data cached
Taste disorder3644.0
32.0–60.6ROR 45.9 · χ² 1,470 / p <1e-300
43.0 EB05 32.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 16.6no trial data cached
Throat irritation7541.1
33.1–51.0ROR 45.0 · χ² 2,897 / p <1e-300
40.7 EB05 33.5 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 42.9no trial data cached
Product taste abnormal1221.8
12.5–38.3ROR 22.1 · χ² 218 / p 1e-49
21.0 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Myoclonus1020.5
11.1–38.0ROR 20.8 · χ² 167 / p 2e-38
19.3 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 131.9no trial data cached
Therapeutic product effect incomplete4415.2
11.4–20.3ROR 16.0 · χ² 573 / p 8e-127
15.0 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact77% consumerno trial data cached
Pharyngeal swelling512.8
5.3–30.6ROR 12.9 · χ² 43 / p 3e-11
8.5 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4no trial data cached
Migraine4311.1
8.3–14.8ROR 11.6 · χ² 386 / p 2e-86
10.7 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 51.2no trial data cached
Burning sensation3110.8
7.7–15.3ROR 11.2 · χ² 267 / p 2e-60
10.2 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.4no trial data cached
Sneezing99.8
5.1–18.9ROR 9.9 · χ² 63 / p 1e-15
7.6 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Drug effect less than expected58.7
3.6–20.8ROR 8.7 · χ² 27 / p 1e-7
5.5 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=2no trial data cached
Therapeutic response shortened64.6
2.1–10.2ROR 4.6 · χ² 14 / p 1e-4
3.6 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.4Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 15.3no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Dysgeusia (altered taste)24881.5
73.4–90.6ROR 114.3 · χ² 19,647 / p <1e-300
80.8 EB05 72.7 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 18.6no trial data cached
Throat irritation7541.1
33.1–51.0ROR 45.0 · χ² 2,897 / p <1e-300
40.7 EB05 33.5 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 42.9no trial data cached
Therapeutic product effect incomplete4415.2
11.4–20.3ROR 16.0 · χ² 573 / p 8e-127
15.0 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact77% consumerno trial data cached
Migraine4311.1
8.3–14.8ROR 11.6 · χ² 386 / p 2e-86
10.7 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 51.2no trial data cached
Taste disorder3644.0
32.0–60.6ROR 45.9 · χ² 1,470 / p <1e-300
43.0 EB05 32.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 16.6no trial data cached
Burning sensation3110.8
7.7–15.3ROR 11.2 · χ² 267 / p 2e-60
10.2 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.4no trial data cached
Product taste abnormal1221.8
12.5–38.3ROR 22.1 · χ² 218 / p 1e-49
21.0 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Myoclonus1020.5
11.1–38.0ROR 20.8 · χ² 167 / p 2e-38
19.3 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 131.9no trial data cached
Sneezing99.8
5.1–18.9ROR 9.9 · χ² 63 / p 1e-15
7.6 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Therapeutic response shortened64.6
2.1–10.2ROR 4.6 · χ² 14 / p 1e-4
3.6 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.4Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 15.3no trial data cached
Drug effect less than expected58.7
3.6–20.8ROR 8.7 · χ² 27 / p 1e-7
5.5 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=2no trial data cached
Pharyngeal swelling512.8
5.3–30.6ROR 12.9 · χ² 43 / p 3e-11
8.5 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4no trial data cached
Wrong technique in device usage process42.1
0.8–5.7ROR 2.1 · χ² 1 / p 0.116
1.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.8
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Device defective34.5
1.5–14.0ROR 4.5 · χ² 5 / p 0.012
3.0 EB05 1.2 · IC025 -0.5
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Zavegepant?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Zavegepant are dysgeusia, throat irritation, migraine, taste disorder, burning sensation, myoclonus. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Zavegepant have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Zavegepant has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Zavegepant causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.