← All comparisons
Head-to-head · FAERS comparison

Cyclophosphamide vs Cyclosporine: side effects in FDA adverse event reports

How to read this page. FAERS report counts have no denominator; the comparison is of reporting patterns, not of risk. Signals are screened against each FDA label (badges) but not causally assessed. Not medical advice.

At a glance

CyclophosphamideCyclosporine
Drug classAlkylating DrugCalcineurin Inhibitor Immunosuppressant
Brand names–Cyclosporine Modified
FAERS reports175,993110,597
Serious96%68%
Death outcome35,64114,502
Boxed warningNoYes Only physicians experienced in management of systemic immunosuppressive therapy for the indicated disease should prescribe cyclosporine capsules, USP MODIFIED.

Signals both drugs share

ReactionCyclophosphamideCyclosporineLabel screen (A / B)
Acute graft versus host disease1,426 · PRR 53.11,290 · PRR 73.5Not in label — unassessed / Labeled (related wording)
Cytomegalovirus infection reactivation1,352 · PRR 55.11,074 · PRR 63.7Labeled (related wording) / Labeled (related wording)
Chronic graft versus host disease1,056 · PRR 48.51,203 · PRR 93.7Not in label — unassessed / Labeled (related wording)
Acute graft versus host disease in skin871 · PRR 54.81,017 · PRR 110.9Not in label — unassessed / Labeled (related wording)
Bk virus infection810 · PRR 37.8828 · PRR 62.2Not in label — unassessed / Labeled adverse reaction
Graft versus host disease in skin543 · PRR 38.8575 · PRR 67.0Not in label — unassessed / Labeled (related wording)
Viral haemorrhagic cystitis284 · PRR 80.2205 · PRR 77.5Labeled (related wording) / Not in label — unassessed
Chronic graft versus host disease in skin213 · PRR 36.2249 · PRR 71.3Not in label — unassessed / Labeled (related wording)
Acute graft versus host disease in liver180 · PRR 39.4265 · PRR 110.3Not in label — unassessed / Labeled (related wording)
Cystitis viral177 · PRR 103.7116 · PRR 83.0Labeled (related wording) / Not in label — unassessed
Acute graft versus host disease in intestine348 · PRR 39.1508 · PRR 107.8Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Encephalitis cytomegalovirus155 · PRR 66.4125 · PRR 77.0Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Thymus hypoplasia140 · PRR 544.092 · PRR 219.5Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Lymphoid tissue hypoplasia139 · PRR 2,025.493 · PRR 320.5Likely indication confounding / Not in label — unassessed
Disseminated aspergillosis123 · PRR 42.290 · PRR 44.9Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed

Labeled signals distinctive to Cyclophosphamide

Labeled signals distinctive to Cyclosporine

Common questions

Which has more reported side effects, Cyclophosphamide or Cyclosporine?

Cyclophosphamide has 175,993 FAERS reports and Cyclosporine 110,597. More reports does not mean more dangerous: volume follows how widely and how long a drug has been used, prescription vs over-the-counter status, and publicity. The seriousness share (96% vs 68%) is a better like-for-like signal of the kind of problems reported.

Which side effects do Cyclophosphamide and Cyclosporine share?

Both drugs carry disproportionality signals for acute graft versus host disease, cytomegalovirus infection reactivation, chronic graft versus host disease, acute graft versus host disease in skin, bk virus infection. Shared signals often reflect a shared drug class or the condition both are used for.

Is Cyclophosphamide or Cyclosporine safer?

FAERS cannot answer that: it has no denominator and no comparator. Use this page to see which risks are already on each label and which signals are unlabeled, then check the prescribing information and your clinician for your situation.

Sources: openFDA FAERS pair statistics (OpenPV build 2026-09-14), FDA labels via openFDA, openFDA count queries for seriousness and deaths. Pair chosen because it is a commonly searched comparison. Generated 2026-10-08.