← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Amlodipine and Atorvastatin side effects: what 4,073 FDA adverse event reports show

Amlodipine And Atorvastatin · 225 reaction terms · 3,664 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Calcium channel blocker and may be

FDA label, Indications wording of the closest related product

Label matched

Amlodipine (Katerzia)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

4,073 reports · 65% serious · 356 with death outcome · 54% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

KATERZIA is a calcium channel blocker and may be used alone or in combination with other antihypertensive and antianginal agents for the treatment of: Hypertension ( 1.1 ) KATERZIA is indicated for the treatment of hypertension in adults and children 6 years and older, to lower blood pressure.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

KATERZIA oral suspension contains 1.30 mg/mL amlodipine benzoate, equivalent to 1 mg/mL amlodipine, a long-acting calcium channel blocker. Amlodipine benzoate is chemically described as 3-Ethy.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 9Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 5Not in label — unassessed 23
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 185 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Type 2 diabetes mellitus649.8
7.7–12.5ROR 9.9 · χ² 495 / p 6e-110
9.4 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 8.9 · ♀ 79% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Hyperlipidaemia198.2
5.2–12.8ROR 8.2 · χ² 112 / p 1e-26
7.1 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Blood cholesterol increased626.9
5.4–8.8ROR 6.9 · χ² 304 / p 2e-68
6.6 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Coronary artery occlusion186.7
4.2–10.7ROR 6.8 · χ² 82 / p 6e-20
5.8 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
End stage renal disease246.7
4.5–10.0ROR 6.7 · χ² 111 / p 3e-26
6.0 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.9 · ♀ 29% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Body height decreased146.7
4.0–11.3ROR 6.7 · χ² 62 / p 2e-15
5.6 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=6no trial data cached
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased325.6
4.0–8.0ROR 5.7 · χ² 118 / p 1e-27
5.2 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Poisoning deliberate105.5
3.0–10.3ROR 5.5 · χ² 33 / p 5e-9
4.5 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.9no trial data cached
Mitral valve incompetence125.5
3.1–9.6ROR 5.5 · χ² 39 / p 2e-10
4.6 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.9no trial data cached
Laryngitis115.2
2.9–9.4ROR 5.2 · χ² 33 / p 4e-9
4.4 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4no trial data cached
Hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar)485.1
3.8–6.8ROR 5.1 · χ² 154 / p 1e-35
4.9 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.0 · ♀ 20% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Economic problem155.0
3.0–8.3ROR 5.0 · χ² 44 / p 1e-11
4.4 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.8no trial data cached
Metabolic acidosis304.9
3.4–7.0ROR 4.9 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21
4.6 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3 · ♀ 0% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Cardiac failure congestive764.8
3.9–6.0ROR 4.9 · χ² 228 / p 1e-51
4.7 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Back injury104.8
2.6–8.8ROR 4.8 · χ² 26 / p 2e-7
4.0 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.9no trial data cached
Nocturia (night-time urination)114.7
2.6–8.4ROR 4.7 · χ² 28 / p 5e-8
4.0 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.6no trial data cached
Blood triglycerides increased164.6
2.9–7.6ROR 4.7 · χ² 42 / p 4e-11
4.1 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Diabetes mellitus694.6
3.7–5.9ROR 4.7 · χ² 194 / p 2e-44
4.5 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 4.2no trial data cached
Hypertensive crisis104.6
2.5–8.6ROR 4.6 · χ² 25 / p 3e-7
3.9 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 4.1no trial data cached
Blood pressure abnormal174.4
2.8–7.1ROR 4.4 · χ² 42 / p 5e-11
4.0 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 3.3no trial data cached
Hiatus hernia114.4
2.4–7.9ROR 4.4 · χ² 25 / p 2e-7
3.8 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Chronic kidney disease644.3
3.4–5.5ROR 4.4 · χ² 159 / p 8e-37
4.2 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 3.9no trial data cached
Blood urea increased144.3
2.5–7.2ROR 4.3 · χ² 32 / p 8e-9
3.8 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 3.6no trial data cached
Glomerular filtration rate decreased104.3
2.3–7.9ROR 4.3 · χ² 22 / p 2e-6
3.6 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached
Upper limb fracture164.1
2.5–6.7ROR 4.1 · χ² 35 / p 2e-9
3.7 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.2no trial data cached
Abasia204.1
2.7–6.4ROR 4.1 · χ² 44 / p 2e-11
3.8 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.5no trial data cached
Oedema434.1
3.0–5.5ROR 4.1 · χ² 98 / p 3e-23
3.9 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.8no trial data cached
Renal failure acute344.1
2.9–5.7ROR 4.1 · χ² 76 / p 2e-18
3.9 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.6no trial data cached
Glaucoma154.0
2.4–6.6ROR 4.0 · χ² 31 / p 1e-8
3.6 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.3no trial data cached
Renal failure (kidney failure)1044.0
3.3–4.8ROR 4.1 · χ² 233 / p 7e-53
3.9 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.5no trial data cached
Rotator cuff syndrome104.0
2.2–7.4ROR 4.0 · χ² 20 / p 5e-6
3.5 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Hypoacusis334.0
2.8–5.6ROR 4.0 · χ² 70 / p 3e-17
3.8 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Coronary artery disease233.9
2.6–5.8ROR 3.9 · χ² 46 / p 5e-12
3.6 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 3.5no trial data cached
Thinking abnormal143.8
2.3–6.5ROR 3.9 · χ² 27 / p 1e-7
3.5 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached
Cardiomyopathy113.8
2.1–6.9ROR 3.8 · χ² 20 / p 3e-6
3.4 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 3.4no trial data cached
Respiratory arrest203.7
2.4–5.7ROR 3.7 · χ² 37 / p 6e-10
3.4 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.1no trial data cached
Seasonal allergy103.6
2.0–6.8ROR 3.7 · χ² 17 / p 2e-5
3.2 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious n=4no trial data cached
Activities of daily living impaired143.6
2.1–6.1ROR 3.6 · χ² 24 / p 6e-7
3.3 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.4no trial data cached
Limb discomfort213.5
2.3–5.4ROR 3.5 · χ² 35 / p 2e-9
3.3 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.5no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hypertension (high blood pressure)1323.2
2.7–3.8ROR 3.3 · χ² 200 / p 1e-45
3.2 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 2.7no trial data cached
Renal failure (kidney failure)1044.0
3.3–4.8ROR 4.1 · χ² 233 / p 7e-53
3.9 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.5no trial data cached
Blood pressure increased973.3
2.7–4.0ROR 3.3 · χ² 151 / p 6e-35
3.2 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 3.2no trial data cached
Myalgia (muscle pain)922.8
2.3–3.4ROR 2.8 · χ² 104 / p 8e-25
2.8 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.0no trial data cached
Blood glucose increased842.3
1.9–2.8ROR 2.3 · χ² 60 / p 5e-15
2.3 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.8Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 2.7no trial data cached
Cerebrovascular accident (stroke)772.3
1.9–2.9ROR 2.4 · χ² 58 / p 2e-14
2.3 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.8Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.0no trial data cached
Cardiac failure congestive764.8
3.9–6.0ROR 4.9 · χ² 228 / p 1e-51
4.7 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Myocardial infarction (heart attack)752.2
1.8–2.7ROR 2.2 · χ² 48 / p 2e-12
2.2 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.7Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 2.0no trial data cached
Diabetes mellitus694.6
3.7–5.9ROR 4.7 · χ² 194 / p 2e-44
4.5 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 4.2no trial data cached
Flushing653.3
2.6–4.2ROR 3.3 · χ² 101 / p 4e-24
3.2 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.9 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Chronic kidney disease644.3
3.4–5.5ROR 4.4 · χ² 159 / p 8e-37
4.2 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 3.9no trial data cached
Type 2 diabetes mellitus649.8
7.7–12.5ROR 9.9 · χ² 495 / p 6e-110
9.4 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 8.9 · ♀ 79% (drug 54%)no trial data cached
Blood cholesterol increased626.9
5.4–8.8ROR 6.9 · χ² 304 / p 2e-68
6.6 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Joint swelling562.4
1.8–3.1ROR 2.4 · χ² 44 / p 1e-11
2.4 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.8Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.2no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Amlodipine (dihydropyridine CCBs) ↔ Peripheral oedema.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Amlodipine and Atorvastatin?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Amlodipine and Atorvastatin are hypertension, oedema peripheral, renal failure, blood pressure increased, myalgia, blood glucose increased. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Amlodipine and Atorvastatin have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Amlodipine and Atorvastatin has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Amlodipine and Atorvastatin causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.