← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Budesonide and Formoterol side effects: what 1,241 FDA adverse event reports show

Budesonide And Formoterol Fumarate · 40 reaction terms · 1,454 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Corticosteroid

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) of the closest related product

Label matched

Budesonide (Pulmicort Flexhaler)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

1,241 reports · 32% serious · 19 with death outcome · 64% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

PULMICORT FLEXHALER is a corticosteroid indicated for: • Maintenance treatment of asthma as prophylactic therapy in adult and pediatric patients six years of age or older ( 1 ) Limitations of Use: Not indicated for the relief of acute bronchospasm ( 1 ) 1.1 Treatment of Asthma PULMICORT FLEXHALER is indicated for the maintenance treatment of asthma as prophylactic therapy in patients six years of age or older.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Budesonide, the active component of PULMICORT FLEXHALER, is a corticosteroid designated chemically as (RS)-11β, 16α, 17,21-Tetrahydroxypregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione cyclic 16,17-acetal with butyraldehyde. Budesonide is provided as a mixture of two epimers (22R and 22S).

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 20 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 15Not in label — unassessed 2
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 20 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Device delivery system issue262169.7
152.3–189.2ROR 214.4 · χ² 43,392 / p <1e-300
166.0 EB05 149.8 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=7 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Device mechanical issue4356.0
41.7–75.2ROR 58.0 · χ² 2,263 / p <1e-300
54.6 EB05 42.2 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Device malfunction17443.5
37.9–50.0ROR 50.4 · χ² 7,189 / p <1e-300
43.2 EB05 38.1 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.6 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Wrong technique in device usage process9133.4
27.4–40.7ROR 36.0 · χ² 2,830 / p <1e-300
33.1 EB05 27.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Product substitution issue9728.3
23.4–34.3ROR 30.6 · χ² 2,530 / p <1e-300
28.1 EB05 23.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 18.1 · ♀ 31% (drug 64%) · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Device issue12123.3
19.6–27.6ROR 25.7 · χ² 2,564 / p <1e-300
23.2 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.0 · 89% consumerno trial data cached
Product packaging quantity issue1523.1
13.9–38.2ROR 23.3 · χ² 295 / p 2e-66
22.4 EB05 14.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Device defective2222.8
15.1–34.5ROR 23.2 · χ² 437 / p 2e-97
22.4 EB05 15.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumerno trial data cached
Incorrect dose administered by device3221.1
15.0–29.8ROR 21.7 · χ² 594 / p 2e-131
20.9 EB05 15.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=4 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Wrong technique in product usage process18315.2
13.3–17.4ROR 17.6 · χ² 2,435 / p <1e-300
15.2 EB05 13.4 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.8 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Asthma7411.1
8.9–13.8ROR 11.7 · χ² 671 / p 3e-148
10.8 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 14.6no trial data cached
Throat irritation259.4
6.4–13.8ROR 9.5 · χ² 179 / p 4e-41
8.5 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 15.8 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Product prescribing issue119.1
5.0–16.3ROR 9.1 · χ² 71 / p 2e-17
7.2 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Product quality issue729.0
7.2–11.2ROR 9.4 · χ² 504 / p 7e-112
8.7 EB05 7.1 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.6 · ♀ 37% (drug 64%) · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Device breakage177.3
4.5–11.6ROR 7.3 · χ² 86 / p 1e-20
6.2 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Therapeutic response decreased257.0
4.7–10.2ROR 7.1 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28
6.3 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.9 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Drug dose omission by device286.1
4.2–8.8ROR 6.2 · χ² 115 / p 3e-27
5.6 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Device difficult to use246.1
4.1–9.1ROR 6.2 · χ² 97 / p 3e-23
5.5 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.7 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Injection site swelling112.4
1.4–4.4ROR 2.4 · χ² 8 / p 0.002
2.3 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.2Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.8no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Device delivery system issue262169.7
152.3–189.2ROR 214.4 · χ² 43,392 / p <1e-300
166.0 EB05 149.8 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=7 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Wrong technique in product usage process18315.2
13.3–17.4ROR 17.6 · χ² 2,435 / p <1e-300
15.2 EB05 13.4 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.8 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Device malfunction17443.5
37.9–50.0ROR 50.4 · χ² 7,189 / p <1e-300
43.2 EB05 38.1 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.6 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Device issue12123.3
19.6–27.6ROR 25.7 · χ² 2,564 / p <1e-300
23.2 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.0 · 89% consumerno trial data cached
Product substitution issue9728.3
23.4–34.3ROR 30.6 · χ² 2,530 / p <1e-300
28.1 EB05 23.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 18.1 · ♀ 31% (drug 64%) · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Wrong technique in device usage process9133.4
27.4–40.7ROR 36.0 · χ² 2,830 / p <1e-300
33.1 EB05 27.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Asthma7411.1
8.9–13.8ROR 11.7 · χ² 671 / p 3e-148
10.8 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 14.6no trial data cached
Product quality issue729.0
7.2–11.2ROR 9.4 · χ² 504 / p 7e-112
8.7 EB05 7.1 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.6 · ♀ 37% (drug 64%) · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Device mechanical issue4356.0
41.7–75.2ROR 58.0 · χ² 2,263 / p <1e-300
54.6 EB05 42.2 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Incorrect dose administered by device3221.1
15.0–29.8ROR 21.7 · χ² 594 / p 2e-131
20.9 EB05 15.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=4 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Drug dose omission by device286.1
4.2–8.8ROR 6.2 · χ² 115 / p 3e-27
5.6 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Therapeutic response decreased257.0
4.7–10.2ROR 7.1 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28
6.3 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.9 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Throat irritation259.4
6.4–13.8ROR 9.5 · χ² 179 / p 4e-41
8.5 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 15.8 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Device difficult to use246.1
4.1–9.1ROR 6.2 · χ² 97 / p 3e-23
5.5 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.7 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Device defective2222.8
15.1–34.5ROR 23.2 · χ² 437 / p 2e-97
22.4 EB05 15.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate ↔ Bone loss.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Budesonide and Formoterol?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Budesonide and Formoterol are asthma, drug dose omission by device, throat irritation. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Budesonide and Formoterol have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Budesonide and Formoterol has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Budesonide and Formoterol causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.