← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Cefepime Hydrochloride side effects: what 16,017 FDA adverse event reports show

Cefepime Hydrochloride · 1,097 reaction terms · 58,039 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Cephalosporin antibacterial

FDA label, Indications wording

Who reports

16,017 reports · 94% serious · 3,529 with death outcome · 44% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Cefepime Injection is a cephalosporin antibacterial indicated in the treatment of the following infections caused by susceptible isolates of the designated microorganisms: pneumonia ( 1.1 ); empiric therapy for febrile neutropenic patients ( 1.2 ); unc.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Cefepime Injection in Galaxy Container is a sterile, injectable product consisting of Cefepime Hydrochloride, USP, a semi-synthetic, broad spectrum, cephalosporin antibacterial for parenteral administration.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Likely indication confounding 5Lab value / disease marker 3Not in label — unassessed 32
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,057 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Meningitis candida11253.6
132.9–483.9ROR 253.7 · χ² 2,107 / p <1e-300
155.5 EB05 92.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Burkholderia test positive18221.3
134.3–364.8ROR 221.5 · χ² 3,184 / p <1e-300
157.7 EB05 105.6 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=18not reported in cached trials
Corynebacterium bacteraemia11200.0
106.0–377.4ROR 200.1 · χ² 1,717 / p <1e-300
133.7 EB05 79.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=11not reported in cached trials
Aeromonas infection13104.9
59.6–184.6ROR 105.0 · χ² 1,143 / p 8e-251
85.3 EB05 53.1 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Hepatosplenic candidiasis1094.9
50.0–180.4ROR 95.0 · χ² 780 / p 5e-172
76.1 EB05 44.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Antibiotic level above therapeutic2794.7
64.1–140.0ROR 94.9 · χ² 2,246 / p <1e-300
83.3 EB05 60.1 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=27 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Cutaneous mucormycosis1294.5
52.6–169.7ROR 94.5 · χ² 949 / p 1e-208
77.6 EB05 47.3 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Trichosporon infection2588.2
58.8–132.2ROR 88.3 · χ² 1,936 / p <1e-300
77.9 EB05 55.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Uraemic encephalopathy1671.5
43.2–118.2ROR 71.5 · χ² 988 / p 4e-217
62.9 EB05 41.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Phrenic nerve paralysis1170.0
38.1–128.3ROR 70.0 · χ² 645 / p 1e-142
59.9 EB05 35.7 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Nail bed inflammation1564.8
38.6–108.8ROR 64.8 · χ² 837 / p 2e-184
57.4 EB05 37.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Geotrichum infection1064.5
34.2–121.8ROR 64.6 · χ² 537 / p 5e-119
55.4 EB05 32.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Cns ventriculitis1562.9
37.5–105.5ROR 62.9 · χ² 813 / p 4e-179
56.0 EB05 36.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Engraft failure1362.4
35.8–108.8ROR 62.4 · χ² 692 / p 1e-152
55.0 EB05 34.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Septic embolus3760.8
43.7–84.5ROR 60.9 · χ² 2,021 / p <1e-300
56.5 EB05 42.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=37not reported in cached trials
Disseminated mucormycosis1552.6
31.4–88.2ROR 52.7 · χ² 681 / p 2e-150
47.7 EB05 30.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Fungaemia5951.3
39.6–66.5ROR 51.5 · χ² 2,750 / p <1e-300
48.6 EB05 39.1 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=59 · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Enterococcal bacteraemia3950.2
36.5–69.1ROR 50.3 · χ² 1,763 / p <1e-300
47.3 EB05 36.1 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=39 · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Cerebral aspergillosis2248.6
31.8–74.4ROR 48.7 · χ² 944 / p 2e-207
45.2 EB05 31.5 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Vancomycin infusion reaction1348.5
27.9–84.4ROR 48.5 · χ² 538 / p 3e-119
44.0 EB05 27.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Nephritis allergic1448.3
28.3–82.4ROR 48.4 · χ² 581 / p 1e-128
44.0 EB05 27.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Eye infection fungal1346.5
26.7–80.8ROR 46.5 · χ² 515 / p 2e-114
42.3 EB05 26.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Stenotrophomonas infection4242.4
31.2–57.6ROR 42.5 · χ² 1,602 / p <1e-300
40.4 EB05 31.1 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pneumonia necrotising2042.0
26.9–65.6ROR 42.1 · χ² 737 / p 1e-162
39.4 EB05 26.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=20not reported in cached trials
Corynebacterium infection1537.9
22.7–63.3ROR 37.9 · χ² 488 / p 2e-108
35.3 EB05 22.7 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Cytomegalovirus enterocolitis2137.1
24.0–57.2ROR 37.1 · χ² 682 / p 1e-150
35.0 EB05 24.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=21 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Engraftment syndrome1636.6
22.3–60.2ROR 36.7 · χ² 505 / p 4e-112
34.3 EB05 22.4 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Ureaplasma infection1136.6
20.1–66.6ROR 36.6 · χ² 337 / p 2e-75
33.7 EB05 20.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Blastomycosis1336.5
21.0–63.3ROR 36.5 · χ² 402 / p 8e-90
33.9 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Differentiation syndrome1935.7
22.6–56.3ROR 35.7 · χ² 590 / p 1e-130
33.7 EB05 22.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19not reported in cached trials
Cytokine storm1835.5
22.2–56.7ROR 35.6 · χ² 555 / p 6e-123
33.5 EB05 22.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18not reported in cached trials
Methaemoglobinaemia6035.0
27.1–45.3ROR 35.2 · χ² 1,898 / p <1e-300
33.8 EB05 27.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=59 · ♀ 15% (drug 44%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Crystalluria1434.4
20.2–58.4ROR 34.4 · χ² 410 / p 2e-91
32.2 EB05 20.3 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Glomerulosclerosis1634.0
20.7–55.8ROR 34.0 · χ² 467 / p 6e-104
32.0 EB05 20.9 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Dysbiosis2033.5
21.5–52.2ROR 33.5 · χ² 583 / p 4e-129
31.8 EB05 21.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Neutropenic colitis5032.5
24.6–43.1ROR 32.6 · χ² 1,461 / p <1e-300
31.4 EB05 24.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=50 · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Nasal mucosal disorder1432.1
18.9–54.5ROR 32.1 · χ² 382 / p 3e-85
30.2 EB05 19.1 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Fusarium infection1631.3
19.1–51.5ROR 31.4 · χ² 430 / p 9e-96
29.7 EB05 19.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Disseminated cryptococcosis1731.0
19.1–50.1ROR 31.0 · χ² 452 / p 1e-100
29.4 EB05 19.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Enterococcus test positive1530.8
18.5–51.4ROR 30.8 · χ² 394 / p 7e-88
29.1 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=15not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Cefepime as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,5631.6
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · χ² 329 / p 7e-74
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.6 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,2041.8
1.7–1.9ROR 1.9 · χ² 460 / p 2e-102
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.7 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Febrile neutropenia87717.6
16.5–18.7ROR 18.5 · χ² 13,538 / p <1e-300
17.3 EB05 16.4 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 10.6 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pneumonia (lung infection)8073.3
3.1–3.5ROR 3.4 · χ² 1,289 / p 1e-282
3.3 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 2.1not reported in cached trials
Sepsis (blood infection)6147.2
6.7–7.8ROR 7.5 · χ² 3,294 / p <1e-300
7.2 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.4not reported in cached trials
Hypotension (low blood pressure)5933.9
3.6–4.2ROR 4.0 · χ² 1,276 / p 1e-279
3.9 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 2.7 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Encephalopathy56030.6
28.2–33.2ROR 31.7 · χ² 15,660 / p <1e-300
29.9 EB05 27.9 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 18.2 · 95% clinicianNCT05887908: 1/306 (0.3%) on Cefepime (serious AE)
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))5555.4
5.0–5.8ROR 5.5 · χ² 1,980 / p <1e-300
5.3 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 3.4 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)5496.5
6.0–7.0ROR 6.7 · χ² 2,536 / p <1e-300
6.4 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.0 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Septic shock50715.5
14.2–16.9ROR 16.0 · χ² 6,810 / p <1e-300
15.3 EB05 14.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.4 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)4961.0
0.9–1.1ROR 1.0 · χ² 0 / p 0.424
1.0 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.1NCT03840148: 18/440 (4.1%) on Cefepime
Respiratory failure4678.4
7.7–9.2ROR 8.6 · χ² 3,039 / p <1e-300
8.3 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.1 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Condition aggravated4662.0
1.8–2.2ROR 2.1 · χ² 243 / p 5e-55
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.9 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Cefepime?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Cefepime are acute kidney injury, pyrexia, febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, sepsis, hypotension. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Cefepime have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Cefepime has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Cefepime causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.