← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Diroximel side effects: what 11,791 FDA adverse event reports show

Diroximel Fumarate · 992 reaction terms · 37,818 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Diroximel Fumarate (Vumerity)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

11,791 reports · 39% serious · 354 with death outcome · 79% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

VUMERITY is indicated for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), to include clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting disease, and active secondary progressive disease, in adults. VUMERITY is indicated for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), to include clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting disease, and active secondary progressive disease, in adults.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

VUMERITY contains diroximel fumarate.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 4Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 6Reporting / coding artifact 4Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 23
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 952 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hemihypoaesthesia19106.6
67.1–169.4ROR 106.8 · χ² 1,776 / p <1e-300
91.6 EB05 62.0 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=7no trial data cached
Multiple sclerosis pseudo relapse1796.0
59.0–156.4ROR 96.2 · χ² 1,427 / p <1e-300
82.9 EB05 54.8 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=8no trial data cached
Neurogenic bowel1076.9
40.8–144.8ROR 77.0 · χ² 647 / p 6e-143
65.0 EB05 37.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=8no trial data cached
Joint space narrowing1061.5
32.7–115.4ROR 61.5 · χ² 518 / p 7e-115
53.7 EB05 31.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=9no trial data cached
Immunisation reaction2050.9
32.6–79.4ROR 51.0 · χ² 903 / p 1e-198
47.4 EB05 32.4 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=8 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Multiple sclerosis1,09941.4
39.1–43.8ROR 45.5 · χ² 42,379 / p <1e-300
40.4 EB05 38.5 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 25.1 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Primary progressive multiple sclerosis1141.1
22.6–74.7ROR 41.2 · χ² 382 / p 2e-85
37.8 EB05 22.5 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=5no trial data cached
Magnetic resonance imaging abnormal2640.0
27.1–58.9ROR 40.0 · χ² 928 / p 5e-204
38.1 EB05 27.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=6 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Vaccination complication1839.3
24.6–62.6ROR 39.3 · χ² 620 / p 4e-137
37.1 EB05 24.8 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=4no trial data cached
Agraphia1339.1
22.6–67.8ROR 39.2 · χ² 436 / p 4e-97
36.4 EB05 22.6 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=2no trial data cached
Band sensation2636.7
24.9–54.2ROR 36.8 · χ² 851 / p 2e-187
35.2 EB05 25.2 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=6 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Product dose omission in error50934.2
31.4–37.2ROR 35.7 · χ² 16,066 / p <1e-300
33.5 EB05 31.1 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 26.7 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Flushing1,61128.4
27.1–29.7ROR 32.7 · χ² 42,016 / p <1e-300
27.9 EB05 26.8 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 14.6 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Lymphocyte count decreased25325.7
22.7–29.0ROR 26.2 · χ² 5,893 / p <1e-300
25.3 EB05 22.8 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 11.7 · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Multiple sclerosis relapse97325.3
23.8–26.8ROR 27.4 · χ² 22,394 / p <1e-300
24.9 EB05 23.6 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 26.1 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Loss of control of legs5023.4
17.7–31.0ROR 23.5 · χ² 1,038 / p 5e-228
23.0 EB05 18.1 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25 · 96% consumerno trial data cached
Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis2220.8
13.6–31.6ROR 20.8 · χ² 390 / p 5e-87
20.2 EB05 13.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=10 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Progressive multiple sclerosis1319.9
11.5–34.3ROR 19.9 · χ² 212 / p 3e-48
18.9 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=4no trial data cached
Clumsiness2818.2
12.6–26.4ROR 18.3 · χ² 434 / p 1e-96
17.8 EB05 12.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=9 · 89% consumerno trial data cached
Central nervous system lesion10713.8
11.4–16.7ROR 13.9 · χ² 1,248 / p 1e-273
13.6 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.2 · 89% consumerno trial data cached
Motor dysfunction7613.4
10.7–16.8ROR 13.5 · χ² 853 / p 9e-188
13.2 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.1 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Infection susceptibility increased1613.0
8.0–21.3ROR 13.1 · χ² 165 / p 5e-38
11.9 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Electric shock sensation1811.9
7.5–18.9ROR 11.9 · χ² 168 / p 9e-39
10.8 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4no trial data cached
Reading disorder1511.7
7.0–19.4ROR 11.7 · χ² 135 / p 2e-31
10.3 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=6no trial data cached
Loss of therapeutic response1911.2
7.1–17.6ROR 11.2 · χ² 165 / p 4e-38
10.1 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4no trial data cached
Trigeminal neuralgia2511.1
7.5–16.4ROR 11.1 · χ² 217 / p 2e-49
10.2 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Full blood count decreased11810.4
8.7–12.5ROR 10.5 · χ² 990 / p 2e-217
10.2 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 21.9 · 95% consumerno trial data cached
Multiple allergies4410.0
7.4–13.4ROR 10.0 · χ² 345 / p 3e-77
9.5 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Gastric disorder19510.0
8.7–11.5ROR 10.1 · χ² 1,557 / p <1e-300
9.8 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.0 · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Prescribed underdose1119.9
8.2–11.9ROR 10.0 · χ² 875 / p 1e-192
9.7 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.8 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Musculoskeletal disorder1069.9
8.1–11.9ROR 9.9 · χ² 830 / p 7e-183
9.6 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.3 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Akinesia119.5
5.2–17.1ROR 9.5 · χ² 75 / p 3e-18
7.6 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4no trial data cached
Cognitive disorder2359.0
7.9–10.2ROR 9.1 · χ² 1,654 / p <1e-300
8.9 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.6 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Gastrointestinal disorder4308.6
7.9–9.5ROR 8.9 · χ² 2,898 / p <1e-300
8.6 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.1 · 91% consumerno trial data cached
Decreased immune responsiveness468.4
6.3–11.2ROR 8.4 · χ² 290 / p 3e-65
7.9 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.7 · 98% consumerno trial data cached
Anal incontinence418.2
6.0–11.1ROR 8.2 · χ² 250 / p 1e-56
7.6 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Peroneal nerve palsy268.1
5.5–11.9ROR 8.1 · χ² 155 / p 8e-36
7.3 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Blood test abnormal648.1
6.3–10.3ROR 8.1 · χ² 390 / p 5e-87
7.7 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.2 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Lymphopenia597.4
5.8–9.6ROR 7.5 · χ² 322 / p 3e-72
7.1 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.9no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Flushing1,61128.4
27.1–29.7ROR 32.7 · χ² 42,016 / p <1e-300
27.9 EB05 26.8 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 14.6 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Multiple sclerosis1,09941.4
39.1–43.8ROR 45.5 · χ² 42,379 / p <1e-300
40.4 EB05 38.5 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 25.1 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Multiple sclerosis relapse97325.3
23.8–26.8ROR 27.4 · χ² 22,394 / p <1e-300
24.9 EB05 23.6 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 26.1 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)8732.4
2.3–2.6ROR 2.5 · χ² 736 / p 2e-162
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.3 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Product dose omission issue8205.1
4.8–5.5ROR 5.4 · χ² 2,735 / p <1e-300
5.1 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.3 · 95% consumerno trial data cached
Fatigue (tiredness)7811.8
1.7–1.9ROR 1.8 · χ² 276 / p 3e-62
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.1 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Nausea7531.7
1.6–1.8ROR 1.7 · χ² 219 / p 6e-50
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.0 · 91% consumerno trial data cached
Headache6191.8
1.6–1.9ROR 1.8 · χ² 204 / p 1e-46
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.2 · 89% consumerno trial data cached
Pruritus (itching)5902.8
2.6–3.0ROR 2.9 · χ² 674 / p 5e-149
2.8 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.3 · 89% consumerno trial data cached
Fall5583.0
2.7–3.2ROR 3.1 · χ² 740 / p 4e-163
3.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.0 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Abdominal discomfort5265.6
5.1–6.1ROR 5.8 · χ² 1,984 / p <1e-300
5.5 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.4 · 91% consumerno trial data cached
Product dose omission in error50934.2
31.4–37.2ROR 35.7 · χ² 16,066 / p <1e-300
33.5 EB05 31.1 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 26.7 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)5030.7
0.6–0.7ROR 0.7 · χ² 83 / p 4e-20
0.7 EB05 0.6 · IC025 -0.7
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.5no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate ↔ Bone loss.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Diroximel?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Diroximel are flushing, multiple sclerosis, multiple sclerosis relapse, diarrhoea, fatigue, nausea. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Diroximel have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Diroximel has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Diroximel causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.