Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil side effects: what 45,339 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Nucleoside Analog Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor
Label matched
Emtricitabine (Emtricitabine)
Who reports
45,339 reports · 84% serious · 1,830 with death outcome · 29% female
Used for
Emtricitabine capsules are indicated in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Emtricitabine, a nucleoside analog HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor, is indicated in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. ( 1 )
What it is
Emtricitabine (FTC) is a synthetic nucleoside analog with activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase.
Boxed warning
POSTTREATMENT ACUTE EXACERBATION OF HEPATITIS B Severe acute exacerbations of hepatitis B (HBV) have been reported in patients who are coinfected with HIV-1 and HBV and have discontinued emtricitabine. Hepatic functi.
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled — boxed warning The term (or its clinical synonym) appears in the FDA boxed warning: causality is regulator-recognised and considered serious.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,144 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skeletal injury | 7,176 | 1,036.4 994.9–1,079.6ROR 1,231.1 · calibrated p 2e-18 ✓ | 316.8 EB05 310.7 · IC025 +8.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 221.6 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Bone loss | 9,107 | 705.6 683.8–728.2ROR 882.7 · calibrated p 1e-16 ✓ | 277.2 EB05 272.5 · IC025 +8.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 202.6 · 99% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Bone demineralisation | 636 | 702.9 621.2–795.4ROR 712.9 · calibrated p 1e-15 ✓ | 274.7 EB05 257.2 · IC025 +7.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=557 | not reported in cached trials |
| Ultrasound antenatal screen | 51 | 540.1 360.0–810.3ROR 540.7 · calibrated p 2e-13 ✓ | 226.6 EB05 179.1 · IC025 +5.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=51 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Bone density decreased | 16,608 | 516.1 505.8–526.6ROR 813.8 · calibrated p 3e-16 ✓ | 242.4 EB05 239.3 · IC025 +7.9 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 184.4 · 99% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Cloacal exstrophy | 30 | 471.1 282.8–784.7ROR 471.4 · calibrated p 2e-12 ✓ | 202.3 EB05 148.5 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=30 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Multiple fractures | 8,185 | 456.1 443.0–469.7ROR 556.4 · calibrated p 2e-14 ✓ | 228.3 EB05 224.1 · IC025 +7.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 165.8 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Tooth injury | 2,090 | 427.2 402.7–453.1ROR 447.8 · calibrated p 2e-13 ✓ | 220.4 EB05 212.6 · IC025 +7.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=2,064 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Bladder agenesis | 31 | 328.3 206.9–520.9ROR 328.5 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓ | 171.2 EB05 126.3 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=31 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Tooth loss | 8,153 | 298.1 290.4–306.1ROR 363.2 · calibrated p 1e-12 ✓ | 180.5 EB05 177.2 · IC025 +7.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 130.2 · 99% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Acute hiv infection | 91 | 272.6 210.3–353.4ROR 273.2 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓ | 165.0 EB05 138.5 · IC025 +6.1 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious n=91 · ♀ 6% (drug 29%) | NCT00557245: 1/1,584 (0.1%) on Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil; 1/1,584 (0.1%) control (serious AE) |
| Protein total abnormal | 449 | 243.1 216.9–272.5ROR 245.5 · calibrated p 7e-11 ✓ | 157.8 EB05 145.9 · IC025 +6.9 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=437 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Aids encephalopathy | 18 | 204.9 117.5–357.4ROR 205.0 · calibrated p 5e-9 ✓ | 123.4 EB05 82.6 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=18 | not reported in cached trials |
| Osteonecrosis (bone death) | 9,161 | 177.1 173.2–181.1ROR 221.7 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓ | 127.8 EB05 125.6 · IC025 +7.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 87.8 · 87% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Bone density abnormal | 1,038 | 175.9 163.8–188.9ROR 180.0 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓ | 126.9 EB05 120.5 · IC025 +6.8 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=853 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Renal injury | 8,006 | 168.6 164.6–172.7ROR 204.6 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓ | 123.3 EB05 121.0 · IC025 +6.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 84.3 · 99% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Osteopenia | 3,942 | 161.5 155.9–167.3ROR 176.8 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓ | 119.4 EB05 116.3 · IC025 +6.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 84.0 · 86% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Gastrointestinal disorder congenital | 27 | 157.6 101.8–244.2ROR 157.7 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓ | 108.5 EB05 78.3 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=27 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Anhedonia | 5,607 | 124.3 120.9–127.9ROR 141.8 · calibrated p 7e-9 ✓ | 97.9 EB05 95.7 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 67.4 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Fanconi syndrome acquired | 369 | 123.6 110.2–138.7ROR 124.6 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓ | 97.0 EB05 89.0 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=368 | not reported in cached trials |
| Caudal regression syndrome | 30 | 108.4 72.8–161.4ROR 108.5 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 83.3 EB05 61.1 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=30 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Osteoporosis | 7,296 | 99.6 97.3–102.0ROR 118.5 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓ | 81.9 EB05 80.3 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 64.6 · 80% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Ultrasound antenatal screen abnormal | 39 | 98.1 69.4–138.7ROR 98.2 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓ | 77.9 EB05 59.5 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=33 · ♀ 100% (drug 29%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Meconium stain | 27 | 96.8 63.9–146.6ROR 96.9 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓ | 75.9 EB05 54.8 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=27 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Alpha 1 foetoprotein abnormal | 17 | 93.3 55.4–157.1ROR 93.3 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 71.6 EB05 47.3 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=14 | not reported in cached trials |
| Congenital genital malformation | 27 | 92.4 61.1–139.8ROR 92.5 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓ | 73.2 EB05 52.8 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=27 · ♀ 100% (drug 29%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Genitalia external ambiguous | 29 | 91.7 61.5–136.6ROR 91.8 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓ | 73.0 EB05 53.3 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=29 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Osteomalacia | 249 | 87.9 76.8–100.6ROR 88.4 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓ | 73.4 EB05 66.1 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=249 · 71% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Fear-related avoidance of activities | 24 | 85.4 55.2–132.0ROR 85.4 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 68.3 EB05 48.3 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=24 | not reported in cached trials |
| Glomerular filtration rate abnormal | 208 | 80.3 69.3–93.0ROR 80.6 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓ | 68.0 EB05 60.6 · IC025 +5.7 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=201 | not reported in cached trials |
| Degenerative bone disease | 65 | 79.6 61.1–103.5ROR 79.7 · calibrated p 9e-7 ✓ | 66.6 EB05 54.1 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=59 | not reported in cached trials |
| Trisomy 18 | 54 | 75.7 56.7–100.9ROR 75.8 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 63.6 EB05 50.6 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=54 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Chronic kidney disease | 10,383 | 72.5 71.1–73.8ROR 93.7 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 62.6 EB05 61.6 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 43.4 · 95% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Tethered cord syndrome | 29 | 68.8 46.6–101.6ROR 68.8 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓ | 57.7 EB05 42.2 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=29 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Economic problem | 1,941 | 66.6 63.6–69.8ROR 69.5 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 58.2 EB05 56.1 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 40.4 · 98% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Heterotaxia | 21 | 66.0 41.7–104.2ROR 66.0 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓ | 55.0 EB05 38.0 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=21 | not reported in cached trials |
| Immune reconstitution syndrome | 155 | 62.1 52.5–73.5ROR 62.3 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓ | 54.4 EB05 47.6 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious n=150 | not reported in cached trials |
| Nephropathy | 1,109 | 61.9 58.2–65.9ROR 63.5 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓ | 54.6 EB05 52.0 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 39.1 · 87% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Vitamin d deficiency | 1,106 | 59.2 55.6–62.9ROR 60.6 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓ | 52.4 EB05 49.9 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 36.8 · 80% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Gastrointestinal malformation | 24 | 59.1 38.6–90.4ROR 59.1 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 50.4 EB05 35.7 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=24 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov
Largest completed trials with posted results that list Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (1 of 40 signal terms matched).
- NCT00557245 — Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis to Prevent HIV-1 Acquisition Within HIV-1 Discordant Couples (N=4758, PHASE3; 172 AE terms posted; arms: Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF); Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumar; Placebo)
Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bone density decreased | 16,608 | 516.1 505.8–526.6ROR 813.8 · calibrated p 3e-16 ✓ | 242.4 EB05 239.3 · IC025 +7.9 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 184.4 · 99% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Chronic kidney disease | 10,383 | 72.5 71.1–73.8ROR 93.7 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 62.6 EB05 61.6 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 43.4 · 95% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Osteonecrosis (bone death) | 9,161 | 177.1 173.2–181.1ROR 221.7 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓ | 127.8 EB05 125.6 · IC025 +7.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 87.8 · 87% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Bone loss | 9,107 | 705.6 683.8–728.2ROR 882.7 · calibrated p 1e-16 ✓ | 277.2 EB05 272.5 · IC025 +8.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 202.6 · 99% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Renal failure (kidney failure) | 9,042 | 33.5 32.8–34.1ROR 41.6 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓ | 31.3 EB05 30.7 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 21.5 · 78% consumer | NCT00557245: 1/1,584 (0.1%) on Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil (serious AE) |
| Multiple fractures | 8,185 | 456.1 443.0–469.7ROR 556.4 · calibrated p 2e-14 ✓ | 228.3 EB05 224.1 · IC025 +7.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 165.8 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Tooth loss | 8,153 | 298.1 290.4–306.1ROR 363.2 · calibrated p 1e-12 ✓ | 180.5 EB05 177.2 · IC025 +7.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 130.2 · 99% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Renal injury | 8,006 | 168.6 164.6–172.7ROR 204.6 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓ | 123.3 EB05 121.0 · IC025 +6.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 84.3 · 99% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Osteoporosis | 7,296 | 99.6 97.3–102.0ROR 118.5 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓ | 81.9 EB05 80.3 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 64.6 · 80% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Skeletal injury | 7,176 | 1,036.4 994.9–1,079.6ROR 1,231.1 · calibrated p 2e-18 ✓ | 316.8 EB05 310.7 · IC025 +8.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 221.6 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Pain | 6,585 | 5.0 4.9–5.1ROR 5.7 · calibrated p 0.173 | 4.9 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 4.8 · 91% consumer | NCT00557245: 2/1,579 (0.1%) on Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil; 2/1,584 (0.1%) control (serious AE) |
| Emotional distress | 6,351 | 25.5 24.9–26.1ROR 29.5 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓ | 24.2 EB05 23.7 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 17.0 · 99% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Anxiety | 5,945 | 9.8 9.6–10.1ROR 11.2 · calibrated p 0.022 ✓ | 9.6 EB05 9.4 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 8.7 · 91% consumer | NCT00557245: 1/1,579 (0.1%) on Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil (serious AE) |
| Anhedonia | 5,607 | 124.3 120.9–127.9ROR 141.8 · calibrated p 7e-9 ✓ | 97.9 EB05 95.7 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 67.4 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Osteopenia | 3,942 | 161.5 155.9–167.3ROR 176.8 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓ | 119.4 EB05 116.3 · IC025 +6.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 84.0 · 86% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Skeletal injury — n=7,176, PRR 1,036.4
- Bone loss — n=9,107, PRR 705.6
- Bone demineralisation — n=636, PRR 702.9
- Ultrasound antenatal screen — n=51, PRR 540.1
- Cloacal exstrophy — n=30, PRR 471.1
- Multiple fractures — n=8,185, PRR 456.1
- Tooth injury — n=2,090, PRR 427.2
- Bladder agenesis — n=31, PRR 328.3
- Tooth loss — n=8,153, PRR 298.1
- Osteonecrosis — n=9,161, PRR 177.1
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Emtricitabine And Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate ↔ Chronic Kidney Disease.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil are bone density decreased, chronic kidney disease, osteonecrosis, bone loss, renal failure, multiple fractures. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil have an FDA boxed warning?
Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: POSTTREATMENT ACUTE EXACERBATION OF HEPATITIS B Severe acute exacerbations of hepatitis B (HBV) have been reported in patients who are coinfected with HIV-1 and HBV and have discontinued emtricitabine. Hepatic functi.
Do FAERS signals prove that Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID cdfb7868-3eba-46e1-a286-ca40760fd98d, effective 20240207; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"EMTRICITABINE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,184 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
EMTRICITABINE, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.